OP
OP
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Nintendo should give Pokemon to Intelligent Systems
- Thread starter Mobu
- Start date
the other parties would never sell
the game you want would be much more expensive yet sell about the same
this is incredibly dumb.
Christ, between this thread and the amount of ignorance about the whole Galar Dex mess it's clear to me that the general public knows very very little of how Pokémon actually works.
Really do hate when people think this is so simple and act as armchair CEOs.
That would be a terrible unrealistic idea. Same with all those dumb "nInTeNdO sHoUlD bE gIvEn ThE sOnIc FrAnChIsE" threads you see.
That would be a terrible unrealistic idea. Same with all those dumb "nInTeNdO sHoUlD bE gIvEn ThE sOnIc FrAnChIsE" threads you see.
Honestly, since XY looks like Game Freak doesn't want to do Pokemon anymore. They don't develop good new ideas, they don't try to push the game to another level, they fuck with competitive with every new idea they make. People can be against this idea, but they should give GF a break to do other stuff.
Nintendo would need to buy out TPC and Gamefreak first, and I imgaine that'd be expensive as fuck.
LOL...the ol' grass is greener fallacy.Nintendo giving away Pokemon.
That won't happen because Gamefreak has leverage on the franchise and neither Nintendo or TPC are unsatisfied with Pokémon or how their partner is doing.
Copyright is divided between Nintendo, Gamefreak and Creatures. Trademark is owned by Nintendo. It's absolutely their IP even if divided with other companies and a brand manager like TPC.
Copyright is divided between Nintendo, Gamefreak and Creatures. Trademark is owned by Nintendo. It's absolutely their IP even if divided with other companies and a brand manager like TPC.
Upending the system sounds like breaking the backwards compatibility, which is what people are so pissed about.
As long as they are committed to coexisting with previous gens and their stat systems, there is only so much the developer can change.
Beyond the ridiculous decision to not have all the Pokemon, I'm honestly satisfied with a lot of the changes they are making with Sword and Shield. It's definitely overshadowing the positive shifts that are happening in the series. I really, really think they need to flood more money into Game Freak, the disparity between Pokemon's global success and the development resources that are available is ridiculous.
The larger point is that it's not Nintendo's call to let IS make the next mainline Pokemon game. The closest IS ever came was a pitch to make a Pokemon x Fire Emblem crossover, but that got shot down because Pokemon Conquest came about.
Pokemon is the story of how to handle a IP to stay relevant for more than 25 years.
GF and Nintendo have made an amazing work, even if everyone feels like the games should cater more to them (and as a competitive player, of course I would love A LOT of canges).
X/Y improed many of those when comparing it to the last games with the Friend safary, destiny knot, weather nerf, megaevolutions, etc...
GF and Nintendo have made an amazing work, even if everyone feels like the games should cater more to them (and as a competitive player, of course I would love A LOT of canges).
X/Y campaign?, maybe but I freaking loved the MP during the X/Y era. Most people just look at the main campagin of pokemon games ignoring everything else (completing pokedex, breeding, post game challenges and MP)
X/Y improed many of those when comparing it to the last games with the Friend safary, destiny knot, weather nerf, megaevolutions, etc...
No.
The Pokémon *Company* is jointly owned by Nintendo, Game Freak and Creatures. Game Freak own the same stake in TPC as Nintendo.
It's not Nintendo's IP. The IP is managed by TPC and de facto is Trademark controller and Nintendo does not control the trademark outside of their ownership of the property because of this.
They would give it to Team Ninja 🤢
I actually think the new Pokemon looks nicer than FE TH
Sword/Shield looks much better than 3 Houses visually though...
3 Houses does not scream "high production value" to me.
3 Houses does not scream "high production value" to me.
Now this is a good idea they don't even have to go far, if they continue with the open Pokemon thing, i wouldn't mind Monolithsoft lending a hand 🖐
It's not up to Nintendo alone, as Game Freak & Creatures all have an equal share of the franchise.
Different engines and art styles.Sword/Shield looks much better than 3 Houses visually though...
3 Houses does not scream "high production value" to me.
Assuming in the bizarro universe that IS somehow was given the task of making a new Pokemon generation, they wouldn't build it off of FE engine tech.
Sword/Shield looks much better than 3 Houses visually though...
3 Houses does not scream "high production value" to me.
3 Houses actually has combat animations though.
Are we talking about the same IS that is currently relying on K-T for help developing the game. I've made the arguement that GF should allow for some outside help like Monolith. However, so far Sw/Sh looks like it is doing a lot right and is making significant improvements to the series. The only Galar Pokedex pokemon is a bit dissapointing. However, I'm thinking we will end up with a 600+ pokedex. In the grand scheme of things it wont be that big of a deal. Then again Gen 3 was my favorite gen.
Nah, Pokemon just needs a bigger team and more teams so like COD so each game has a longer dev cycle
If you would rather have your precious Pokémon run over everything instead of more Advance Wars or Code Name: STEAM (or indeed even more FE), your priorities are wrong, your taste is wrong, your judgement is wrong, and I'm glad you're not in charge.
Not so much a hot take but more of people increasingly becoming more annoyed by GF being so out of touch the last 6 years
If by people you mean a vocal minority then sure. Doesn't seem like the rest of the world agrees with this sentiment.
I know TPC is a jointly venture of them and I never said they don't manage the serie, but TPC is irrelevant in the equation for ownership which is what I was talking about. Like I said before, Nintendo have the copyright and trademark of Pokémon. The difference is that TPC exists and they manage the franchise in and outside of games. In the case of console gaming, they publish it along Nintendo.
© 2019 Pokémon. © 1995–2019 Nintendo/Creatures Inc./GAME FREAK inc. Pokémon, Pokémon character names, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo 3DS, Nintendo DS, Wii, Wii U, and WiiWare are trademarks of Nintendo. The YouTube logo is a trademark of Google Inc. Other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Sure, we can agree on that. XD
I wouldn't outright take the development entirely away from GF, but it could make sense for them to co-develop it with a studio that is more experienced with the tech side of development, so that GF can concentrate on the story, characters, presentation, etc.
I'm not sure that IntSys would be such a developer though.
I'm not sure that IntSys would be such a developer though.
IS made Paper Mario: Sticker Star which is the worse game either IS or GameFreak has made by a healthy margin and Codename S.T.E.A.M. isn't great.
Uh yeah?
Fire Emblem Three Houses has the potential to be one of the best FE ever.
