• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Lime

Banned for use of an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,266
The "Do people ever call Nintendo "kiddy" anymore?" thread made me think of the ways that Nintendo brands their corporate brand for decades with "family-friendly entertainment" that never tries to rock the boat or offend anyone (read: certain type of consumers). But in fact, this veneer of 'comfortable entertainment for all ages' is often used to deflect criticisms of the very conservative politics they put in their games. This has been reiterated over and over again with their incredibly dumb excuse of "not making any political statements" and that Nintendo "just want to have fun". Just think of the excuse to exclude non-hetero relationships in Tomodachi Life in 2014 with their shitty excuse of saying that they want to focus on 'fun' in their games and not have any politics. Instead of understanding and taking the feedback into account, their corporate branding strategy basically tells us that their version of 'fun' does not include other non-straight forms of relationships, as Dr. Todd Harper wrote back then:

Both Nintendo and Pardo rhetorically position "fun" and "entertainment" and "gameplay" as inherently opposed to "socially responsible/progressive. [...] "It's very much disheartening to hear a company say they 'value fun' as an excuse for excluding gay relationships," Gaymer X president Toni Rocca said. For Rocca, using the primacy of fun as a logic for cutting diverse content is basically a cop out. "That's just valuing straight relationships, or at best saying that fun is exclusive to them," she explained"

And I was unfortunately saddened to see that as recently as this June in 2017 before E3, the PR mouthpiece Reggie Fils-Aime came out and continued this false and harmful dichotomy between 'fun' and political identities:

reggiepoisono4skr.jpg



Which the website Femhype aptly skewered for its defense and maintenance of the status quo:

I am still rather disappointed that you continue to claim an apolitical stance when you clearly have not done so. The games you make all have their own political messages whether you realize it or not, and these messages can have a profound impact — both positive and negative — on the gamers who play them. By refusing to make a "statement," you actually made one: that you prefer to maintain the status quo rather than try to step outside of the box and appeal to the wide spectrum of gamers you have in your fanbase.

And apparently this PR veneer of 'fun' seems to be working, as I don't see many people criticize Nintendo for their very socially conservative depictions of e.g. gender in the for example otherwise critically lauded Breath of the Wild. Somehow this game is wildly celebrated as an artistic achievement, yet its constant centering of the male Link as the hero of the story after decades of the same old conservative narrative, the key to Zelda's destiny is a tired sexist trope, and the game'scasual transphobia as Jennifer Unkle for Paste Magazine writes:

I don't fault critics for falling in love with Breath of the Wild. The game's willingness to throw out series staples and chart a new course is commendable. But I can't help feeling bitter when I read the glowing acclaim, or eyeball its perfect review scores. Surely these same critics saw Link's horror at Vilia's face? When they praised the developers for showing progress, or Tweet about "thirsty Nintendo," did the game's blatantly transphobic joke not count as a step backward? The game's disdainful stance toward my existence stings even worse when no one else acknowledges it as a problem. Should I let this slide as a small misstep and move on, or address a hurtful joke others ignored and risk looking oversensitive?

As Feminist Frequency tweeted back in March and which is relevant for the current GOTY discussions surrounding the game:



I honestly think it's about time Nintendo wises up and evolves away from their very conservative approach to their games in relation to social themes and characters, and that gaming culture and critics don't turn a blind eye to their maintenance of the gaming status quo.
 

PattonFiend

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
215
Link and Mario could both dress as women in their newest games... but Nintendo is sooooo closed-minded towards social happenings..?

I guess I am just not seeing it... :(
 

Robin

Restless Insomniac
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,502
Link and Mario could both dress as women in their newest games... but Nintendo is sooooo closed-minded towards social happenings..?

I guess I am just not seeing it... :(

I don't particularly agree with OP but Link's crossdressing in BotW was actually seen as problematic by a whole slew of people.

I'd understand your stance better if Nintendo hadn't been improving in representation of women and minorities while spouting their usual spiel. Games like Animal Crossing and Pokemon finally have inclusive casts, gay people finally exist to the company as of Fire Emblem, and there are more playable women then there ever have been.

If the giant isn't moving fast enough for you it's understandable, but to pretend like this is a distraction tactic while they sit on their ass and do nothing is disingenuous.

Pretty much, this.
 

brainchild

Independent Developer
Verified
Nov 25, 2017
9,478
You can criticize how they represent politics in their games just fine, but you shouldn't conflate the acclaim of their games with acceptance of bad political representation.

People are capable of looking at those components separately and assigning how much each element of a game's design influences their overall critique of a game. Some people don't factor the political elements of games as heavily into their critiques as others and they're perfectly well within their right to do so.
 

Cap G

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,488
I'd understand your stance better if Nintendo hadn't been improving in representation of women and minorities while spouting their usual spiel. Games like Animal Crossing and Pokemon finally have inclusive casts, gay people finally exist to the company as of Fire Emblem, and there are more playable women then there ever have been.

If the giant isn't moving fast enough for you it's understandable, but to pretend like this is a distraction tactic while they sit on their ass and do nothing is disingenuous.
 

Raijinto

self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
10,091
For a start your Tomdatchi Life piece is missing a crucial piece of information. After they were put on blast for how they handled the situation, I am 99.9% certain that Nintendo apologised and promised at the very least to consider having homosexual relationships in a potential sequel.

And BoTW has many great women characters so I don't understand the FF tweet aside from being disappointed at Zelda's damsel in distress role.
 

lvl 99 Pixel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,685
are they suggesting that the crossdressing scene means that people dont give a damn about women, and that it should have had significant points deducted for this?
that seems like such an extreme stance to take over such a tiny part of a game. I thought the scene was dumb, but if you're part of any fan art community people seemed to really love the crossdressing Link unironically.
 

Deleted member 8001

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
7,440
I'd understand your stance better if Nintendo hadn't been improving in representation of women and minorities while spouting their usual spiel. Games like Animal Crossing and Pokemon finally have inclusive casts, gay people finally exist to the company as of Fire Emblem, and there are more playable women then there ever have been.

If the giant isn't moving fast enough for you it's understandable, but to pretend like this is a distraction tactic while they sit on their ass and do nothing is disingenuous.
I wouldn't use Fire Emblem as a defense, the representation there is honestly pretty bad. Also more playable women in Fire Emblem is nice except for how much they get fan serviced compared to the male characters.
 

P-MAC

Member
Nov 15, 2017
4,460
But I can't help feeling bitter when I read the glowing acclaim, or eyeball its perfect review scores. Surely these same critics saw Link's horror at Vilia's face?

This entirely didn't happen. It was more like mild surprise, and not in a negative way.
 

Aprikurt

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 29, 2017
18,781
I can see the cross dressing in BotW is problematic, but I absolutely don't agree that games need to have a political message in order to be successful or respected.

What do you need exactly, the ruler of a Fire Emblem kingdom to be an orange-skinned, loud-mouthed tyrant with a shock of blonde "hair"?
 

jonjonaug

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,674
Xenoblade X is a progressive wet dream of a game (bikini armor aside) full of political statements, along with Xenoblade 1 and 2 to lesser extents, so I don't know what Reggie was ever going on about there.
 

PattonFiend

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
215
Have you played the game? I don't want to give spoilers away but theres an entire city in the game that you can't enter unless.....
Anyways, you can't choose in this case
But you can choose to dress as a woman any time you want in both games. You are limiting the game to one experience by saying that...

...and yes, I have played the game:

2ntzswy.jpg
 
Last edited:

Cap G

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,488
I wouldn't use Fire Emblem as a defense, the representation there is honestly pretty bad. Also more playable women in Fire Emblem is nice except for how much they get fan serviced compared to the male characters.
Both characters suck, but the company outright didn't have any gay characters that were taken even moderately seriously prior. Gay people existing > gay people not existing.
 

Kyra

The Eggplant Queen
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,250
New York City
Isn't link bossed around by several women in powerful positions for much of the game? I feel as if BotW has some of the best treatment of women in a game I've played. Is it bad because link is still a man?
 

Ereineon

Member
Nov 8, 2017
1,214
But I thought BotW depicted women as the main force?
The princess is the one who saved the world (and the hero), the princess is the protagonist of the story in the end with her growing up depicted on the memories, the one sacrifices herself, the one who imprison ganon in the end... yes, Link is the protagonist of the story, but we also see 2 female champions (who also lead their people), 2 male champions, and the princess saves the day/century...
I dont understand those groups and their agendas.

Did they even play the game or are they just trying to use its fame for exposure?

Also the coment about trans or gay characters and their interactions with Link are totally out of place, those kind of interactions where more like the anecdotal joke moment as they tease him...

Anyway, whatever they do, some of these "feminist" groups will find some excuse anyway so... whatevs
 

Sahasrahla

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
244
Kakariko
Link and Mario could both dress as women in their newest games... but Nintendo is sooooo closed-minded towards social happenings..?

I've been meaning to ask about Japanese people and how they view cross-dressing. I'm just starting to learn a tiny bit about Japanese culture and heard that in the past in theatres men would play also the female roles. That made me wonder if they see cross-dressing as we do in the west, either as fetish / raunchy fun or more recently as transgender, or do they view it more like just dressing up in a costume in general?
 

Sylverstone

Nothing amazing happens here.
Member
Oct 24, 2017
449
New York City
I'd understand your stance better if Nintendo hadn't been improving in representation of women and minorities while spouting their usual spiel. Games like Animal Crossing and Pokemon finally have inclusive casts, gay people finally exist to the company as of Fire Emblem, and there are more playable women then there ever have been.

If the giant isn't moving fast enough for you it's understandable, but to pretend like this is a distraction tactic while they sit on their ass and do nothing is disingenuous.

Explained it better than I could.

I'm not gonna expect sweeping changes to be made overnight. If you're expecting that, you're gonna be disappointed all the while, even with the bits of progress that come through.
 

Shroki

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,911
I don't particularly agree with OP but Link's crossdressing in BotW was actually seen as problematic by a whole slew of people.

Oh fucking brother.

He has to dress up like a women to get into a place where only women are allowed. It has all the social commentary of a typical Bosom Buddies episode (read: none at all).
 
Last edited:

Robin

Restless Insomniac
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,502
...and it was seen as a step in the right direction by others by allowing the player to choose.

It's hard to spin it as a positive when the game is constantly fetishizing Link in the gerudo outfit as well as them making a gag out of the guy with a beard who sells it to you. In my friend group many of my trans friends oggled and cheered the slew of fan art, and I honestly found it cute and fun as well, but really critically looking at the game itself and how it's presented it's rather hard to actually spin it as a positive.

Oh fucking brother.

He has to dress up like a women to get into a place where only women are allowed. It has all the social commentary of a Bosom Buddies episode (read: none at all).

I'm not certain what you're getting at. Intent has nothing to do with whether something is ultimately a positive or negative representation.
 

Charamiwa

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,056
How you get the Gerudo clothes can be seen as problematic (or really immature, if anything). But the fact is you can then cross dress to your heart desire for the rest of the game (including the final boss and the end cutscene), and NPCs will compliment your look, or don't say anything at all. Passed the original scene, you won't ever get criticized or mocked for wearing women's clothes, on the contrary. I don't see that as problematic.
 

Killingmoon

Member
Oct 28, 2017
262
I play games because I want to relax and have fun. I don't play it to be embroiled in stupid politics because I already encounter that every day in my working hours. I'm fine with Nintendo games taking a conservative and neutral stance in these topics. And it's not like they're not improving in that front either.

Frankly, I have no fucking idea how you can enjoy games. Even in the old forums, it's like you're always looking for something to be politically outraged over.
 

P-MAC

Member
Nov 15, 2017
4,460
Isn't link bossed around by several women in powerful positions for much of the game? I feel as if BotW has some of the best treatment of women in a game I've played. Is it bad because link is still a man?

I think people who criticise that scene are saying it's offensive to cross dressers and the trans community not women. It's about sneaking into a city run by woman so if not, that stance would be pretty stupid. I still agree with you though, it's just a bit of fun that doesn't suggest anything negative about those groups at all.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
Eh, I think it's pretty disengenous to label Breath of the Wild as a game that treats it's female characters poorly. Two of the five champions are women, and Gerudo Town got a lot of praise for it's wide variety of body types as well as portraying a society full of women eschewing traditional gender roles. Yes, the scene in which Link reacts to Vilia can definitely come across as problematic, but acting as though Link's cross dressing or the way the game represents women is universally derided by the LGBT and feminist gaming community is just false.

On top of that, you are conveniently ignoring the areas in which Nintendo's representation of women or LGBT characters are slowly but surely getting better, because it doesn't fit your point. ARMS has nearly half of its roster as female characters, representing a wide variety of ages, looks, playstyles, etc. Fire Emblem is finally featuring openly gay characters.
 

Lord Azrael

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,976
Just because their games are praised doesn't mean people are turning a blind eye to some problematic aspects. People can buy a game without condoning everything in it, and there have been plenty of discussions about some of the examples you listed.

I hate Reggie and his dumb PR statements but I wouldn't take that as a reflection of the views held by the people actually making the games. The developers themselves have been trending much better on a lot of these things recently.
 

Pancakes R Us

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,343
I'd understand your stance better if Nintendo hadn't been improving in representation of women and minorities while spouting their usual spiel. Games like Animal Crossing and Pokemon finally have inclusive casts, gay people finally exist to the company as of Fire Emblem, and there are more playable women then there ever have been.

If the giant isn't moving fast enough for you it's understandable, but to pretend like this is a distraction tactic while they sit on their ass and do nothing is disingenuous.
My problem is why has it taken this long. Why in what was it...2013, when Animal crossing New Leaf released we could not make our charachter a non-Caucasian one? It's not like this was the dark ages or anywhere close the various traditional civil rights movements. I love Nintendo. Love the company and its games and characters. However, it is still run by a bunch of old men in Japan that don't seem to either care or have the faintest clue about certain things. Or both.
 

Majukun

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,542
not everything is political,not everything is a statement.

it doesn't magically become one just because you wish it was
 
Oct 28, 2017
833
Netherlands
In your dreams they'll change this policy, maybe. This type of deflection is what's kept Nintendo out of some very hot political waters in both the 80's and 90's. David Sheff wrote about some very though experiences the company had to go through when entering the marketplace.

The easy answer here is that those times are over but that's horseshit. In recent weeks we've seen a big hollywood blockbuster highjacked by rightwingers to air grievances about diversity. All of it bullshit but it had enough impact to influence popular perception in a negative way.

Simply put, becoming part of the resistance is something Nintendo will never do. It cedes control of the narrative of the products they put out. Only when the resistance had become the defacto status quo will you see Nintendo adapt. Untill then, it's like trying to scream at the tide to turn back.

Good luck with that OP.
 

Copper

Banned
Nov 13, 2017
666
I agree with that declaration by films-aime being problematic especially as he is american, but their games? They're probably the most progressive your could get from japan which is 100% homogeneous and incredibly misoginist. See:
- how competent are depicted women in general in the last Zelda
- how varied are skintones in the latest Nintendo games, including splatoon and arms
- how u can dress as a woman in both Mario and Zelda and no one care
- how there's an use of non-gendered character choices in the latest pokemon

I was sad to see botw's link not a woman, but Keep in mind what kind of people are making this. I mean, look at what misoginist garbage come out from japan on average. Nintendo have been trying to improve at least.
 

Kyra

The Eggplant Queen
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,250
New York City
I think people who criticise that scene are saying it's offensive to cross dressers and the trans community not women. It's about sneaking into a city run by woman so if not, that stance would be pretty stupid. I still agree with you though, it's just a bit of fun that doesn't suggest anything negative about those groups at all.

I mean as a whole.. Zelda has to defeat ganon and needs links help to do it but she's been fighting evil while link has been in dreamland.. If anything link is trying to catch up with her and hey on her level while everyone else in the world has their shit together. If anyone is in distress in this game it's link.
 

Charamiwa

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,056
It's hard to spin it as a positive when the game is constantly fetishizing Link in the gerudo outfit as well as them making a gag out of the guy with a beard who sells it to you. In my friend group many of my trans friends oggled and cheered the slew of fan art, and I honestly found it cute and fun as well, but really critically looking at the game itself and how it's presented it's rather hard to actually spin it as a positive.
This is absolutely not true. At most he gets compliment for how good he looks, but most of the time it's just treated like any other outfits. Like I said,you can finish the game with it, can do the whole game like that, and it's never brought up.
 

Watershed

Member
Oct 26, 2017
7,816
I think Nintendo is changing and in a progressive direction in many ways. Their stance shouldn't be understood as static.

Gay relationships are much more common in Nintendo games lately such as FE. Animal Crossing is becoming more inclusive with skin color options and allowing cross-dressing without any humor. And BOTW features strong female characters like Urbosa despite Zelda being fairly absent by nature of the story.

And I think there is some truth on Nintendo's part in the idea that they do not consider political messages when making their games. Historically you can see how this creates some challenges for English localizations when problematic ideas or visuals that are normal in Japan run into issues with NOA.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
My problem is why has it taken this long. Why in what was it...2013, when Animal crossing New Leaf released we could not make our charachter a non-Caucasian one? It's not like this was the dark ages or anywhere close the various traditional civil rights movements. I love Nintendo. Love the company and its games and characters. However, it is still run by a bunch of old men in Japan that don't seem to either care or have the faintest clue about certain things. Or both.
You are right, Nintendo is a company run by old Japanese men, their games are primarily developed in an extremely conservative environment. Yet despite that, they've begun to slowly adapt and change for the better.
 
Dec 18, 2017
1,374
Uh, Anita says some things I agree with. But the one about Breath of the Wild I certainly don't agree with.

It seems almost like she's trying to shame or pressure reviewers into lowering the score of Breath of the Wild. Or acting as if thinking or treating BOtW as a 10/10 game and feminism are mutually exclusive. That tweet sounds a bit unreasonable.
If rating Breath of the Wild 10/10 means you can't be a feminist or don't care about feminism, I guess that means I can't be a feminist.
 

Wiped

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
2,096
What a load of nonsense.

Nintendo makes a point of deliberately avoiding anything political, or controversial. Will that lead to Nintendo games feeling super old fashioned in like another 100 years time? Maybe. But you can already feel a hint of modernity with things like the androgynous designs of the squid people in Splatoon, or the ability to cross-dress in Mario & Zelda.

Not everything needs to be a political statement. I don't think we need a big statement about gay relationships or feminism in Super Mario Odyssey or Zelda Breath of the Wild. I really don't.
 

Robin

Restless Insomniac
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,502
How you get the Gerudo clothes can be seen as problematic (or really immature, if anything). But the fact is you can then cross dress to your heart desire for the rest of the game (including the final boss and the end cutscene), and NPCs will compliment your look, or don't say anything at all. Passed the original scene, you won't ever get criticized or mocked for wearing women's clothes, on the contrary. I don't see that as problematic.

It's a mixed bag IMO. I'm just hesitant to call it purely positive, which the poster I was quoting was.
 

Jebusman

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,086
Halifax, NS
I've been meaning to ask about Japanese people and how they view cross-dressing. I'm just starting to learn a tiny bit about Japanese culture and heard that in the past in theatres men would play also the female roles. That made me wonder if they see cross-dressing as we do in the west, either as fetish / raunchy fun or more recently as transgender, or do they view it more like just dressing up in a costume in general?

Half and half? It's definitely used to deconstruct gender roles in certain media, stuff like Revolutionary Girl Utena, Rose of Versailles, etc. Essentially exploring themes that would still be considered relatively taboo ("forbidden love") at the time in the general public.

And then for some it's really just dressing up in a costume.

The Takarazuka Revue is a good example of this. All female theatre troupe that's been around since the 1910s. I would have no doubt some of the actors there may be using the crossdressing as a liberating way to escape the perceived gender roles they are expected to be in. And some of them might just consider it a job and just dressing up.
 
Last edited:
Oct 27, 2017
1,611
Australia
I guess at least they aren't intentionally using politically loaded imagery and themes and then going "haha, of course our game doesn't actually have anything to say" like Detroit and Far Cry 5?
 

PattonFiend

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
215
It's hard to spin it as a positive when the game is constantly fetishizing Link in the gerudo outfit as well as them making a gag out of the guy with a beard who sells it to you. In my friend group many of my trans friends oggled and cheered the slew of fan art, and I honestly found it cute and fun as well, but really critically looking at the game itself and how it's presented it's rather hard to actually spin it as a positive.

I don't agree at all. Giving the player the choice seems to me to be a step in the right direction towards change, and that it what is important here. Maybe they did not pull it off exactly how everyone wanted, but they tried something new, they tried to bring a little change in their games with not only these two games (Mario and Zelda) but also games like Fire Emblem and Animal Crossing. Agree to disagree :)
 

psychowave

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,655
Reggie's statement was dumb as hell (like most of what he says as a PR mouthpiece tbh). Nintendo has been getting a lot better with social issues, but they have a long way to go.

I don't agree at all. Giving the player the choice seems to me to be a step in the right direction towards change, and that it what is important here. Maybe they did not pull it off exactly how everyone wanted, but they tried something new, they tried to bring a little change in their games with not only these two games (Mario and Zelda) but also games like Fire Emblem and Animal Crossing. Agree to disagree :)

I don't see how Fire Emblem is a positive example of anything when it comes to social issues, unless I misunderstood you and you were talking about something else.
 

Majukun

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,542
Uh, Anita says some things I agree with. But the one about Breath of the Wild I certainly don't agree with.

It seems almost like she's trying to shame or pressure reviewers into lowering the score of Breath of the Wild. Or acting as if thinking or treating BOtW as a 10/10 game and feminism are mutually exclusive. That tweet sounds a bit unreasonable.
If rating Breath of the Wild 10/10 means you can't be a feminist or don't care about feminism, I guess that means I can't be a feminist.

now it has became her job,so he has to create controversy to "spread awareness"

basically it's like PETA,no one in their right mind would ever dismiss their main mission, but the ways they try to keep the matter relevant ends up hurting the fight altogether...when you call wolf all the time, nobody will really care when the pack comes to town.
It's hard to spin it as a positive when the game is constantly fetishizing Link in the gerudo outfit as well as them making a gag out of the guy with a beard who sells it to you.

how in the blue hell is the game fetishizing LInk in gerudo clothes ò_ò?
 

Typhon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,110
I play games because I want to relax and have fun. I don't play it to be embroiled in stupid politics because I already encounter that every day in my working hours. I'm fine with Nintendo games taking a conservative and neutral stance in these topics. And it's not like they're not improving in that front either.

Frankly, I have no fucking idea how you can enjoy games. Even in the old forums, it's like you're always looking for something to be politically outraged over.

I'm not agreeing with the OP's argument but don't you ever want to be challenged? Plenty of games made me think in new ways because they were bold enough to challenge my preconceptions and not play it safe. Just how movies, tv shows and books have done the same. Why should games be any different?
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
Uh, Anita says some things I agree with. But the one about Breath of the Wild I certainly don't agree with.

It seems almost like she's trying to shame or pressure reviewers into lowering the score of Breath of the Wild. Or acting as if thinking or treating BOtW as a 10/10 game and feminism are mutually exclusive. That tweet sounds a bit unreasonable.
If rating Breath of the Wild 10/10 means you can't be a feminist or don't care about feminism, I guess that means I can't be a feminist.
Agreed, especially when considering all the positive discussion surrounding the Champions or Gerudo town. That tweet reads as if they are telling everyone what they should think rather than experiencing the game for themself and coming to their own conclusion. It's gatekeeping, and I hate to see a normally positive force for feminism in gaming engaging in that kind of behavior.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.