It's not really a bold prediction.
Why would it be a win situation for Nintendo?
The user would pay Microsoft for their streaming service to play multiple games on Nintendo hardware.
Nintendo allowed other publishers to stream their games on Nintendo consoles (like DQX on 3DS and RE7 on Switch) but those were single game affairs that would never cut into Nintendo profits.
Nintendo never allowed a streaming service of a library of games from Square Enix or Capcom.
How do you think Nintendo would react at the prospect of a buyer purchasing their hardware only to run another company streaming service to play all the games they need?
We are going toward a digital and service based future, the idea that Nintendo would give the key of their future to another company is silly.
On the contrary Nintendo should work hard to maximize their digital sales, they are still far behind.
I don't think you have understood my point.
I would imagine the reason for no Netflix has nothing to do with competition and there are numerous arrangements that can be made between MS and Nintendo to have the service be mutually beneficial for both parties. Say Nintendo got a cut of the subscription fee on Switch for instance, not mention Nintendo's driving force has always been selling their own software, not other parties, therefore a streaming service that got their device into more hands would only have a synergistic effect in driving their software sales.
and this.,
Take Two has to be looking at the fact that a relatively niche Switch third party game just won the whole damn month and are probably questioning their resolve as to how long they can possiblly hold out on GTAV Switch.
