Well at least you're not sporting an anime avatar!
Yikes, this whole thing got even more gross (and on that note, screw MikeZ too).
Is Link a minor in BotW (not even considering the 100 year thing and all XD)? Thought he would be at least 18.
One of my friends used to joke about shota stuff, like wanting to lick Ciel Phantomhive's bellybutton and stuff like that. But she was obviously joking, and wasn't saying it with an audience of that size. Once you have a certain amount of reach, it won't matter if it's a joke or not, the wrong people will take it as affirmation. It's dangerous.
An....interesting cross-section of avatars from posters trying to discredit OP's intentions without engaging with the content of his post:
[mod edit: content removed]
I guess I missed that then.
He is a 117 year old dragon okay!! D:
So do other Nazis and Nazi apologists like ArmouredSkeptic, Chris Ray Gun, sh0eonhead, Count Dankula, psychicpebbles, OneyNG, and then others like iDubbbz, Guru Larry, and Egoraptor. I had no idea so many collaborated and followed this neo Nazi pedophile. I don't know if Shadman has been arrested yet, he fled Switzerland from police investigating his pedophilia.Jessica Nigri follows him as well and promoted him on her Twitter.
I've posted this image before and got a warning for it but fuck, It's still 100% accurate.
Aren't you thinking about TP Link?
Or maybe timing isn't big of a factor as you'd like to believe and that there's nothing wrong with discussing this individuals transgressions when the person involved partakes in the same community as them? It's like saying we should never have any threads calling out sexual harassers because it doesn't target every single sexual harasser in existence. It's all just semantics. b
y'all say this like "avatar shaming" is some sort of disgusting crime
Aren't you thinking about TP Link?
Althought that would be more like 10 017 yo or something :p
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
You did make a sweeping statement about Jessica promoting Shadman, and even I had to look that up.
She cosplayed as his rendition of Kylo Ren
People think you saying her crediting his work for a cosplay she did is her condoning his views
So do other Nazis and Nazi apologists like ArmouredSkeptic, Chris Ray Gun, sh0eonhead, Count Dankula, psychicpebbles, OneyNG, and then others like iDubbbz, Guru Larry, and Egoraptor. I had no idea so many collaborated and followed this neo Nazi pedophile. I don't know if Shadman has been arrested yet, he fled Switzerland from police investigating his pedophilia.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
Why's it in gaming? Not contesting her fairly repellent proclivities but what's it got to do with gaming? She's not a gamedev and seems to be famous for being an anime cosplayer. Her only link to gaming seems to be she enjoys it as a hobby and was harassed by a gamedev. Are you planning to make a string of posts about how the various victims of game devs harassment are also shitty people?
whatOn one hand, yeah sexualizing depicted minors is creepy taken at face value. But I think there's some truth to the fact that these aren't real people. You can draw a person and say they're 12 or 20, the intention really doesn't matter, it all comes down to depiction and interpretation. It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable, that's everyone's call to make, but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent? That seems pretty harsh imo, and kind of oblivious to the reality of the situation. Let's not forget that they're fictitious depictions of imaginary people. Bottom line for me is if it's not leading you to sexualize real children, or see children in a sexual light, it shouldn't be seen as a problem. And of course with everything that's within reasonable limits.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
This is the worst take i've ever seen.Oof. Well this is a minefield of a topic, and I know nothing about the people involved, but here's my two cents.
On one hand, yeah sexualizing depicted minors is creepy taken at face value. But I think there's some truth to the fact that these aren't real people. You can draw a person and say they're 12 or 20, the intention really doesn't matter, it all comes down to depiction and interpretation. It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable, that's everyone's call to make, but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent? That seems pretty harsh imo, and kind of oblivious to the reality of the situation. Let's not forget that they're fictitious depictions of imaginary people. Bottom line for me is if it's not leading you to sexualize real children, or see children in a sexual light, it shouldn't be seen as a problem. And of course with everything that's within reasonable limits.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
We're both right :phaha no, but i associate link with wolfs sinc TP, not dragons :P
Of course you would say that you no-avatar youFor me it's like pointing out someone is inferior and invalidates them just because of their avatar
The obtuseness is over 9000?!!?That's called a nick
For the record, my name is not Reinhardt Schneider
Should we seek out and shame/accuse of yellowface every user here in era with an asian nickname?
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
Want a gold star or something?Yeah WTF are people posting defending sexualisation of minors here?
We're both right :p
Of course you would say that you no-avatar you
No it's not. Not ridiculous at all. Sexualizing children is sexualizing children. What's the difference if it's drawn?
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
take your money back, your currency's no good hereOof. Well this is a minefield of a topic, and I know nothing about the people involved, but here's my two cents.
Oof. Well this is a minefield of a topic, and I know nothing about the people involved, but here's my two cents.
On one hand, yeah sexualizing depicted minors is creepy taken at face value. But I think there's some truth to the fact that these aren't real people. You can draw a person and say they're 12 or 20, the intention really doesn't matter, it all comes down to depiction and interpretation. It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable, that's everyone's call to make, but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent? That seems pretty harsh imo, and kind of oblivious to the reality of the situation. Let's not forget that they're fictitious depictions of imaginary people. Bottom line for me is if it's not leading you to sexualize real children, or see children in a sexual light, it shouldn't be seen as a problem. And of course with everything that's within reasonable limits.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
Oof. Well this is a minefield of a topic, and I know nothing about the people involved, but here's my two cents.
On one hand, yeah sexualizing depicted minors is creepy taken at face value. But I think there's some truth to the fact that these aren't real people. You can draw a person and say they're 12 or 20, the intention really doesn't matter, it all comes down to depiction and interpretation. It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable, that's everyone's call to make, but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent? That seems pretty harsh imo, and kind of oblivious to the reality of the situation. Let's not forget that they're fictitious depictions of imaginary people. Bottom line for me is if it's not leading you to sexualize real children, or see children in a sexual light, it shouldn't be seen as a problem. And of course with everything that's within reasonable limits.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
1. It does. Pedophile isn't a person who sexually abuses a child. A pedophile is a mentally ill person who is sexually atracted to kids.but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent?
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas?
Oof. Well this is a minefield of a topic, and I know nothing about the people involved, but here's my two cents.
On one hand, yeah sexualizing depicted minors is creepy taken at face value. But I think there's some truth to the fact that these aren't real people. You can draw a person and say they're 12 or 20, the intention really doesn't matter, it all comes down to depiction and interpretation. It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable, that's everyone's call to make, but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent? That seems pretty harsh imo, and kind of oblivious to the reality of the situation. Let's not forget that they're fictitious depictions of imaginary people. Bottom line for me is if it's not leading you to sexualize real children, or see children in a sexual light, it shouldn't be seen as a problem. And of course with everything that's within reasonable limits.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
What the fuck did i just read.Oof. Well this is a minefield of a topic, and I know nothing about the people involved, but here's my two cents.
On one hand, yeah sexualizing depicted minors is creepy taken at face value. But I think there's some truth to the fact that these aren't real people. You can draw a person and say they're 12 or 20, the intention really doesn't matter, it all comes down to depiction and interpretation. It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable, that's everyone's call to make, but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent? That seems pretty harsh imo, and kind of oblivious to the reality of the situation. Let's not forget that they're fictitious depictions of imaginary people. Bottom line for me is if it's not leading you to sexualize real children, or see children in a sexual light, it shouldn't be seen as a problem. And of course with everything that's within reasonable limits.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!