This is what I've been hoping for awhile, but not this big. I use a 50in 4k TV as my monitor at the end of a desk and it works great, but 65 is just too big
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Nvidia presents BFG Display - 65" 4k HDR 120hz + Nshield screens
- Thread starter Bombless
- Start date
TVs offer faaaar more value for money.
Monitor prices are straight up awful and the PG27UQ is a perfect example of that.
Well I dunno how official it is if Asus guy says its 2000$.
It depends what you want, if you want TV then TV is better.
If you want to game on good monitor then you get monitor.
This is going to expensive AF right? Has Nvidia ever developed a TV before? Or did they subcontract to another company to create this. What kind of quality can we expect?
I would be interested if it was oled but probably too rich for my blood.
I'm guessing it's not a penny under $5,000, unless they subcontract TCL to build this. If so then i would expect $1,500 for the tv and $1,000 for the Nvidia branding so a total of $2,500.
Edit: AUO Fuggetaboutit
I would be interested if it was oled but probably too rich for my blood.
I'm guessing it's not a penny under $5,000, unless they subcontract TCL to build this. If so then i would expect $1,500 for the tv and $1,000 for the Nvidia branding so a total of $2,500.
Edit: AUO Fuggetaboutit
Last edited:
Some vid back when they announced it, I cant try to find it fast but no promises.
Edit: found it (at 5min mark if it doesnt automatically start from there)
The point I was making is that gaming monitors are overpriced for what they offer.
The premium you have to pay for high refresh rate+G-Sync is crazy to me
I mean the PG279Q, a 27" 165Hz/GSync IPS monitor with notorious QC issues (and an 8bit panel and obviously no HDR, local-dimming, WCG...), is $750...
Yes its true it costs but TV:s dont offer high refresh or low input lag, I guess thats what costs.
Ultimately, that's a question of how much you value maximum refresh rate / input lag / VRR support.
Also, monitors and TVs aren't really direct replacements for each other. The use case differences imply different design tradeoffs. And of course, the mid-level TV market is many times larger than the enthusiast monitor market.
Wow thanks for that. I've never actually seen that before. A blanket price of $2000 in "all territories" seems quite odd. Not sure how official that price statement was but thats probably the only statement they've had on price. This was also before the monitors were delayed in manufacturing so it makes you wonder if the price was effected in anyway.
Why would you integrate an Nvidia Shield instead of just having the powerful chip it uses?
Or is Nvidia Shield referring to software?
Or is Nvidia Shield referring to software?
Shield is the full platform. Android OS, Nvidia game store and the Tegra X1 to run it.
Why the FUCK is this 65"? Who the fuck has a PC gaming setup that can accommodate something that large and to be able to sit far enough away?
Stupid.
Stupid.
Everyone who has their PC connected to a (large) TV?
I don't think it's that unusual.
Why are people having such a hard time understanding that this is just a TV? Is the picture really THAT much of a mindfuck that you can't extrapolate that at 65" this is intended as a living room/couch distance display? Jesus fuck.
65" low latency 1000nit 4K HDR display with DCI-P3. Did someone crawl into my head? what I really want to know is how much of Rec 2020 it covers and if it's Dolby Vision compatible. would be even better as an OLED but this thing is going to be pricey. would be amazing to see it at $3k but it'll probably be closer to $5K
My 65'' Tv is mounted on the wall in my living room and I have my PC hooked up to it.
I want it. I wanted a 65" 4k TV before this, but making this a monitor is perfect. I watch most content on my PC anyways. Alas, I know this will probably be out of my price range. $3500 or under and I will start saving.
Yeah and this isn't a TV. And even those people you mention are a very small subset who typically have a medium-range PC which they share with a console. People with gaming PCs that can actually use a display like this, pushing 4k and high FPS, do not play/use their computer from a couch.
Erm, how do you know all this? Like that there are no people who use a high-end gaming PC from a couch?
(Incidentally, I know for a fact that this is not the case)
Of course it's not a mainstream device, but that doesn't mean that no one wants it or has a use for it.
I'd buy this over a TV honestly if it was the same price as a tv and use it as...a TV. Crazy I know but TV's are not a good value for what you pay. It's like a prebuilt PC with things you cant uninstall. Yay for having settings that anyone with eyesight will turn off, junk video and streaming apps that I already get through every other piece of technology in my house and low refresh rate/high input lag? My friends remote has a motion tracker in it and he has to point it at the screen, it's like they thought "how do we combine computers and tablets and make them harder to use, a TV!".
My 60" TV takes up pretty much my entire field of view from my sofa. This is the definition of excessive.
Uhm, i would like this monitor if the price is right to replace my TV. You see, my gaming PC, which was once a huge tower like we typically think of when we talk about PC gaming is now a mini-ITX build in a node 202 case, which is a tad bigger than a console but fits beautifully in my home entertainment center and plugged on the TV.
Couch gaming..
Something like Gsync and low lag for TV gaming is something very desirable.
Does that make me stupid?
So you're going to replace your 65" TV with a 65" PC gaming monitor?
at some point it's like who gives a shit. This is going to be insanely expensive for something that is undoubtedly better but it's not like you're replacing crt tech. it's just hard to get excited about stuff like this when even a bad lcd is pretty good these days.
There are people with every kind of setup; doesn't make this a good idea.
I mean you're telling me ASUS, Acer, etc. are trying to tap into the "has a ridiculous gaming PC hooked up to a huge TV" market?
Nah man. They're going after all the people who have a 10' wide computer desk. You know all those 10' wide computer desks.
I could see why someone would do that. 120 hz at 65" seems pretty dope.
Yes, otherwise they wouldn't build this kind of display.
I assume that, just like for high-end G-sync monitors, the numbers don't need to be huge for it to be a profitable venture.
Why not? I think the kind of people interested in something like this are rarely the ones who use the built-in tuner of their TV.
Eh, I have my PC connected to my 65" OLED display, and I know plenty of people that do something similar. Crazy notion, right?