Costa Rica Set To Become The Worlds First Plastic-Free And Carbon-Free Country By 2021 :
https://www.intelligentliving.co/costa-rica-plastic-carbon-free-2021/
https://www.intelligentliving.co/costa-rica-plastic-carbon-free-2021/
This.
Also this. Or even reduce meat consumption.
Where is "here"?Over here we have MANDATORY vegetarian days every week in schools etc.
Or, as Eric Levitz of New York Magazine puts it, all we need to do to avoid going out in "a globe-spanning murder-suicide" is "to build an international government that recognizes the interdependence of all living things."
If you're asking how one would go about planting a large number of trees, donate to organizations that will do it for you or if you want some healthy, fresh nature air, ask around if there is some kind of organization nearby who are welcoming to and in need of volunteers. Shouldn't be too hard to google & email nearby groups.
Have no fear - you can now fatten Fido on black soldier flies instead of Brazilian beef.
A pet food manufacturer now claims that 40% of its new product is made from soldier flies.
It's one of many firms hoping to cash in on the backlash against beef by people concerned that the cattle are fed on soya.
These soya plantations are responsible for the release of greenhouse gases in significant quantities.
Is it good for the dog?
The key question is whether a diet of 40% soldier flies meets the nutritional needs of your beloved canine.
We put the question to a pet diet expert at the Royal Veterinary College, Aarti Kathrani. Her conclusion was a cautious "yes".
The most effective individual steps to tackle climate change aren't being discussed
The four actions that most substantially decrease an individual's carbon footprint are: eating a plant-based diet, avoiding air travel, living car-free, and having smaller families.
Individual actions are fantastic, but we also need a collective effort. Check out groups such as Extinction Rebellion and The Climate Mobilization and get involved in any way you can.
The young Americans, some of whom are now adults, argue that they have a constitutional right to a stable climate that sustains life on Earth. While this right is obviously not enumerated in the US Constitution, they say that it is implied by the document.
Their case—which originated in Oregon district court—has been surprisingly successful so far, though the government has fought the kids hard. The matter has survived efforts to dismiss it by two presidential administrations, that of Barack Obama and now of Donald Trump. The fossil fuel industry briefly intervened in the case, joining the government as defendants before asking the courts to release them from the matter, a motion which was granted in 2017. The case was set for trial twice in 2018, but the Trump administration repeatedly moved for delay and dismissal.
Last July, the US Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, denying the administration's application for a stay and calling a request to review the case before the district court hears all of the facts at trial "premature." The high court again denied a Trump administration request for a stay in November. But the feds fought on and the Department of Justice immediately filed more motions to quash the case at the district and circuit court level. The government has gone to great lengths to avoid a trial that will no doubt highlight the science behind climate change and reveal the extent to which representatives failed to act on information about environmental dangers.
One overlooked way to fight climate change? Dispose of old CFCs.
The banned refrigerants not only degrade ozone, they act as greenhouse gases. New models are making it easier to get rid of old stocks.
This.
-Travel less, or cover your carbon footprint
-Reduce meat consumption
-Buy 2nd hand stuff
-Never use plastic bags
-Choose green energy
-Dont FUCKING OWN A CAR
-Use Public transpor
But people are too selfish to do even one thing of those mentioned. Just look at any vegetarian thread, people will basically fight you if you take away anything from them.
Also this. Or even reduce meat consumption.
Over here we have MANDATORY vegetarian days every week in schools etc.
Maybe not, but they're the least we can do. Climate change is a problem for everyone and we all need to be accountable. Too many people just shrug and go "well me doing x won't change anything so I'll do nothing and blame it all on the government and corporations." DO BOTH - change what you can, and campaign for the restIndividual changes aren't enough. The real damage to climate change is being done by governments and corporations.
Direct your ire towards them.
Maybe not, but they're the least we can do. Climate change is a problem for everyone and we all need to be accountable. Too many people just shrug and go "well me doing x won't change anything so I'll do nothing and blame it all on the government and corporations." DO BOTH - change what you can, and campaign for the rest
I think there's a line and far more serious questions need to be asked about our corporations.
How much energy does a company like Sony use? Are they utilizing Solar or other renewable sources of energy? If they are that would make a whole lot bigger difference than me buying a Telsa or even 100 of us buying a Telsa.
Where do they source their parts for their consoles and other electronics they manufacture? Are their factories environmentally friendly? What about CO2 emissions from said factories?
Then there is the contradiction with travelling. Modern society is pushing wanderlust, exploring new cultures and going to see the world yet at the same time people are supposed to travel less?
How do those two things compute? A better alternative would be to push airlines and cruise ships to go green.
Changing what you can won't make a blind bit of difference in my opinion if the major sources of climate change don't change their ways.
Of course, one way we can make a change is if society as a whole refused to support companies that aren't eco-friendly thereby forcing them to change the ways.
I would say bush and gore would be the most important in climate change action2020 election is going to be the most important event in climate change action. We must get people to vote.
😒I would say bush and gore would be the most important in climate change act.
It's nice to see good news every once in a while.
You could probably obtain a similar image normally, at least at later parts of the season, but still:
this is all well and good until you realize there are corporations that if they went out of business would instnatly change the carbon impact being put into the environment.This.
-Travel less, or cover your carbon footprint
-Reduce meat consumption
-Buy 2nd hand stuff
-Never use plastic bags
-Choose green energy
-Dont FUCKING OWN A CAR
-Use Public transpor
But people are too selfish to do even one thing of those mentioned. Just look at any vegetarian thread, people will basically fight you if you take away anything from them.
Also this. Or even reduce meat consumption.
Over here we have MANDATORY vegetarian days every week in schools etc.
check out energysage.com they'll ask you information and then you get quotes from a number of providers in your area.I've been interested in solar, but the door-to-door salesmen don't seem to instill much confidence in me, and I'm not inclined to to give business to companies that seek me out.
What are some of the best solar companies out there? Are solar shingles becoming a real thing soon? I don't want to invest $25k in ugly panels if shingles are around the corner and mass market pricing may be on the way.
Thanks!
You are right. I think the best way to make them cleaner is to use biofuels (NOT by cutting forest), or making them carbon neutral by using capturing tech (look at https://www.lanzatech.com/).Also, flights are probably the last thing we'll be able to make carbon neutral. The physics of Flight require extremely gravimetric dense AND volumetric dense Energy fuels, like gasoline.
Traditional conservative and socialist parties can no longer form a majority, making them more reliant to pass European laws on support from liberal and Green blocs that want to push climate change up the agenda
The impacts of Sweden's carbon tax have grown over time. By 1995, emissions were 15% lower than they would have been without the carbon tax. By 2000, emissions were as much as 25% lower than they would have been without the carbon tax.
We should note that Sweden's emissions actually rose for the first half of the 1990s. But that doesn't mean the carbon tax wasn't working. This is a really important distinction. We need to measure where emissions would be without the tax, not just if they're lower overall. Even when emissions were rising, Sweden's carbon tax was changing behaviour.
Thanks for posting this!Cross post:
It's been a while since this thread has seen any activity unfortunately. I'm bumping it because tomorrow is Show Your Stripes day, which is based off of the temperature stripes graph by Ed Hawkins showing temperature from the mid/late 1800's to now:
You can find your local "temperature stripes" here: https://showyourstripes.info/
Edit: And links to data here: https://www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/2018/warming-stripes/
Personally I think its a fantastic idea and is an amazing way to show the effect of AGW not only on a global but also a local scale, and I'm going to put up a thread about it tomorrow. Many places are selling shirts with local temperature stripes on it, and also some TV meteorologists will be wearing their temperature stripes on broadcast to raise attention. This is the second annual observation of the event, following last years Stripes for Solstice.
Something to keep in mind : )