I just want a Monster with 20 tflops. it is doable. 64CUs 64 Shaders and 2450mhz can consume 300w I don't care
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
PC Gamers: How 'attainable' is 4K/60fps today?
- Thread starter Fiery Phoenix
- Start date
A die that big would be crazy they'd need to have monster returns on it and make use of every piece of silicon.
Rumours says the big one will have 505mm2 so maybe
or even more CUs with less clock like 72 but I think AMD will delivery :)
Biggest Navi & 3080 Ti will probs both hit 20 or just under it. It will cost your arm though.
Wasn't this a thing with past consoles, where they were more powerful than existing hardware? Not sure about the ps4, xbox one gen though
Nah I think prices will be lower. $899
AMD i think around 20 tflops and 3080ti around 22-23 tflops
I think it was in one of next-gen threads... but I'm not sure
Not sure about more powerful but I think the 360 had features that hadn't been released in PC hardware at the time.
4K/60 is game dependents and you need like a 2080+ at the least. We likely will see a lot of dynamic resolution and 4k/60 in name only next gen but settings dropped to medium or low in some areas.
Even next year it may be hard for the cheaper side of GPUs to attain easily.
Even next year it may be hard for the cheaper side of GPUs to attain easily.
Of the 11 current-gen AAA/AA titles I played this year, I played 6 of them at 4k60 on my 3.5-year-old machine. 3 were 1800p60, and the other two were FPS I played at the desk at 1440p 100+ FPS gsync. Max or near max settings. My CPU is definitely starting to hold me back (6700k @ 4.7ghz).
New console generation means a new build though... 3950x + 3080Ti here I come!
New console generation means a new build though... 3950x + 3080Ti here I come!
Not very honestly. The GPUs that can run it are outrageously expensive and IMO 4K doesn't look noticably better than 1440p and I sit pretty close to a 55" TV. 1440/60 is the way to go in my opinion. If anything I'm more interested in higher framerates (144 for example) than 4K.
Faux-4K and 60fps most likely will be. Which is great, because good checkerboarded 4K looks like true 4K on TVs.
Aren't even 4K movies mastered in 1440p and upscaled to 4K, due to the extrapolating costs of special effects when working at 4K? I'm sure I watched a YouTube video about that recently.
Makes sense that games could adopt a similar approach, working towards better upscaling techniques of lower resolutions rather than brute forcing 2160p.
Makes sense that games could adopt a similar approach, working towards better upscaling techniques of lower resolutions rather than brute forcing 2160p.
Some movies have some elements processed at 1080p (2K), but that's not universal, and certainly not the norm for major modern movies.
1440p is a poor target for 4K output anyway. But I'm sure there will be plenty of upscaled/checkerboarded games on the next gen consoles.
1440p still looks noticeably better on a 4K screen than 1080p, even if it's not a perfect scale.
Ive been doing it with a 1080ti and ryzen 1700. Doesnt work for everything but it does well enough most of the time. Destiny 2, Witcher 3, etc. A 2080ti is definitely not required.