I feel the same way. I believe that this is a 9TF system myself.I actually feel like he is bullshitting us here. This is a 9.2TF GPU....They have added "Variable" as a last minute thing imo.
I feel the same way. I believe that this is a 9TF system myself.I actually feel like he is bullshitting us here. This is a 9.2TF GPU....They have added "Variable" as a last minute thing imo.
Yes, full on xbox for xb1, limited for 360 and og xbox
PS2 was weaker, still sold well though
Wait, the PS5 doesn't even stay at it's full TF # most of the time?
Ps1 also
It is 10.2, it won't maintain 10.2. It will rarely reach 10 IMO.
We don't know that yet.
The SSD performance loads gamers fasters. And if devs take advantage of that, that means the PS5 could theoretically run games better.
But again, WE DON'T KNOW.
wat
"its dangerous to rely on teraflops for performance" to quote mark cerny from the stream.I actually feel like he is bullshitting us here. This is a 9.2TF GPU....They have added "Variable" as a last minute thing imo.
I think that is the advantage. Loads.
I do not think many developers will necessarily design their entire gameplay experience around something so much slower than main memory. But I imagine some PS5 exclusive could have some "you are instantly transported here" things in scenes. That is always fun.
Nvmes full on throughput with those large files is great, but it is still not main memory. Intel Optane helps bridge that gap a bit better, but still, is not main memory.
I don't understand why MS went with the more powerful system. Their studios never put out visually impressive games, and third parties probably won't develop games with XB as the base system.
Bigger open worlds with less load times, less need for corridors also those are mainly used to hide load screens
So in the summer or once your PS5 has collected some dust, your games will run worse?
Will be interesting to hear more about this.
lmfaoI don't understand why MS went with the more powerful system. Their studios never put out visually impressive games, and third parties probably won't develop games with XB as the base system.
It is 10.2, it won't maintain 10.2. It will rarely reach 10 IMO.
I don't understand why MS went with the more powerful system. Their studios never put out visually impressive games
Wrong.12 Tflop vs 10.2 Tflops.
The differences in games will be minimal. Diminishing returns.
Doubtful for third party devs who will largely be developing for the lowest common denominator, and both the XSX and PC markets will basically all be using slower drivesWe don't know that yet.
The SSD performance loads gamers fasters. And if devs take advantage of that, that means the PS5 could theoretically run games better.
yep. 16.67%12 Tflop vs 10.2 Tflops.
The differences in games will be minimal. Diminishing returns.
It's true, though. Relying mainly on that causes bottlenecking."its dangerous to rely on teraflops for performance" to quote mark cerny from the stream.
Yikes. This is some massive damage control on their system being slower.
Somebody explain the comparison to Xbox Series X to me, please.
I wanted faster loading times. Can you imagine a Bloodborne without loading times????imagine thinking that gamers wants slightly faster loading times instead of more powerfull cpu\gpu...
if this thing is more than 400 dolars just for the ssd, sony is totally out of his mind...