• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,658
Pokemon at it's core is a fantasy cock-fighting adventure game and at some point you have to come to terms that beating up and capturing animals to use for sport like that is messed up. The series has tried to mask this through contests, grooming shops, saying that a pokeball is an ideal world for the mon, and generally showing Pokemon as willing participants, but I think taking out the battle component altogether for wild encounters is a big step towards depicting humane treatment of Pokemon. I guess the next step would be we have to convince the Pokemon to our side instead of trapping them in a pokeball from the outset. But yeah I'm pretty happy I don't have to leave a trail of unconscious and weakened wild animals in my wake, even if it's a virtual space. It makes it more believable that these are animals people coexist with, rather than dominate.
 

Spacejaws

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,819
Scotland
I don't know isn't it worse? Instead of battling being an inherent part of their nature and eco system now you take the peaceful mons, give them a perfect little pocket dimension to live in then the next time you send them out it's against a big filthy Onix and you are commanding it to fight.
 

Camjo-Z

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,514
Did people forget that wild Pokemon are hostile or something? Imagine stepping out of your house and immediately encountering a horde of squirrels and birds that can breathe fire out of their mouths and shoot electric bolts out of their cheeks, and they all want a piece of you.
 

Crissaegrim

Member
May 23, 2018
1,026
You still use them for fighting, so it really doesn't matter. Weakening them was such a big part of it, it's weird it's not there with the Let's Go games. It was okay too because typically you would bring them to Nurse Joy right after. She fixes everything.
 

Tathanen

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,038
How about this. The "combat realm" is one generated when you engage a Pokeball in any capacity, and you're actually having a totally metal battle that's being visualized as a physical one. All these lightning bolts, earthquakes, giant waves, things that would be absolutely destroying the world and making it impossible for anyone to live in it? All just a figment projected by the amazing pocket-dimension of the Pokeball.

I wonder how people would react to an explanation like that in a new game actually.
 
OP
OP
Zen

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,658
Peta would be one of the Teams trying to kill all Pokemon because they've been infected by human presence
I don't know isn't it worse? Instead of battling being an inherent part of their nature and eco system now you take the peaceful mons, give them a perfect little pocket dimension to live in then the next time you send them out it's against a big filthy Onix and you are commanding it to fight.
Pokemon have always been depicted as peaceful by the shows and later games. I don't think the games will ever reconcile that, maybe in future games we can have personality types that aren't suited to combat but are better for field work or helping the trainer in other ways.
 

LinkStrikesBack

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
16,366
Instead of giving them a quick end OP, you're now kidnapping them and forcing the vast majority of them in to an endless solitary confinement for the rest of their lifespan.


Good job.
 

ffvorax

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,855
Did people forget that wild Pokemon are hostile or something? Imagine stepping out of your house and immediately encountering a horde of squirrels and birds that can breathe fire out of their mouths and shoot electric bolts out of their cheeks, and they all want a piece of you.
Thats how I always saw it... I mean, humans like needs pk to protect themselves by other pk... if not, they would actually die...?
That said, it's not a world depicted that cruel, but that it is the base of it... it's a dangerous world. And for how cute pk are, these are dangerous beasts too!
 

Aktlys

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,535
Remember how those spearow almost murdered Ash and pikachu?
Wild pokemans cruel creatures
 

OrangeNova

Member
Oct 30, 2017
12,669
Canada
Honestly, I don't understand this stance on video games. They're not real animals, do you have problems killing boars in WoW? or wolves in Final Fantasy?

It's a different, made up world. The important thing should be less "Hey, this is an analogue to the real world, nothing should be hurt ever!" and "hey, it's important to understand the difference between fiction and reality."
 

LinkStrikesBack

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
16,366
Remember how those spearow almost murdered Ash and pikachu?
Wild pokemans cruel creatures

Yep. Gotta remember that these wild Pokémon are dangerous. They're the ones who actively attack trainers too.

Mimkyu is capable of inducing death in people who look at it under the rag. Driffloon actively try to float off in to the sky with children.

Almost any random Pokémon is capable of inflicting deadly poison on another Pokémon or person.

And they're supposed to be left to roam free?
 

RochHoch

One Winged Slayer
Member
May 22, 2018
18,920
Gameplay >>>> "Immersion" or whatever

Weakening Pokemon to capture them is fun and sometimes requires the player to think. It's so much better than a shitty waggle minigame that it's not even funny.
 

NookSports

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,213
Gameplay >>>> "Immersion" or whatever
Weakening Pokemon to capture them is fun and sometimes requires the player to think. It's so much better than a shitty waggle minigame that it's not even funny.

I disagree. I actually like this mechanic a lot more than the fighting. I wish the 'waggle' was a bit more accurate, or at least that they gave more of a tutorial on how to be accurate... but other than that, i think it breaks up the game flow much better and make the game feel less grindy. It's part of why I've loved Let's Go, tbh
 

Deleted member 283

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,288
Peta would be one of the Teams trying to kill all Pokemon because they've been infected by human presence

Pokemon have always been depicted as peaceful by the shows and later games. I don't think the games will ever reconcile that, maybe in future games we can have personality types that aren't suited to combat but are better for field work or helping the trainer in other ways.
Always? That's a powerful word there. Because I seen to remember like the first episode of said show having stuff like a group of Spearow continuing to attack Ash/Pikachu even after Pikachu was barely able to continue battling. And I didn't watch the movie remake of that that came out s bit ago, but that was like the same deal there too right? And then you have stuff like the Beedrill in Viridian Forest.

And then jumping a bit later, weren't Pokémon like Ursaring almost always depicted as vicious and dangerous when it showed up in Pokémon Johto?

So like I'm not sure where this idea that the show depicts Pokémon as inherently peaceful is coming from. It seems to very much depend on the species, and even then, sometimes on the individual Pokémon themselves how they're depicted. There are no consistent rules.
 
Nov 17, 2017
12,864
XxQ1ODa.gif


N would gladly take you in to Team Plasma, OP.
 

ItIsOkBro

Happy New Year!!
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
9,516
don't all the games say you can't leave town without a pokemon because these wild fuckers will eat and kill you
 
Oct 27, 2017
42,700
Pokemon isn't suppose to be humane. You're engaging in large scale dogfighting. Why not take out battles entirely then? Why not remove their attacks and just make them glorified pets while we're at it? This is completely absurd.
 

Nax

Hero of Bowerstone
Member
Oct 10, 2018
6,674
If these are the conversations that Lets GO has created, please, lets put that back in Pandora's Box and never speak of it again.
 
OP
OP
Zen

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,658
The tone of the games and shows is never as dark and gruesome as the flavor text hints at though. And the games already treat the mons as glorified pets in spite of their supposed danger, fighting aside.

I mean you didn't answer the question :>
I'm high on rare candy
 

Mister X

Banned
Dec 5, 2017
2,081
I think you're forgetting that this is a game OP, you know some lines of code.

This isn't real.
 

Deleted member 5764

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,574
The next step is Pokemon x Undertale. Every Pokemon has a unique set of requirements where you can choose to FIGHT or TALK. Everyone who chooses "FIGHT" will have the new region's Pokemon professor talk down to them for being such a horrible person.

The final credits for those who choose FIGHT above all else will be one of those ASPCA commercials. You'll listen to "In the arms of an angel" whilst watching a slideshow of all the battered Pokemon you fought. You monster.
 

The Silver

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,725
Wild pokemon are so dangerous that the people of Pallet Town are completely trapped in their extremely small town unless with no utilities like a mart unless they get a trainer escort.

The professor in Ruby/sapphire tried to leave and almost got mauled to death by a Poochyena cause he dropped his bag.
 

Phellps

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,811
As an avid Pokémon player and a strong advocate for the betterment of the lives of animals and plants alike, I was never really bothered by anything in Pokémon because the games makes it clear they enjoy all of it.
So it's whatever.
 

Slam Tilt

Member
Jan 16, 2018
5,585
...it's a game in a fantasy world. The whole premise falls apart the moment you apply any logic to it. Like, how can society even survive in a world where kids leave home and wander the world as soon as they turn ten years old?
 
OP
OP
Zen

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,658
...it's a game in a fantasy world. The whole premise falls apart the moment you apply any logic to it. Like, how can society even survive in a world where kids leave home and wander the world as soon as they turn ten years old?
I guess I'm more appreciating that in Let's Go kids are introduced to Pokemon as wild animals first than vicious monsters, since by and large Pokemon are treated as animals and not monsters. The world conforming to reality isn't part of the premise.
 

Zellia

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,769
UK
If you think wild encounters are bad you should see the horrific incestuous breeding programs to get competitive Pokemon. Cheating in Pokemon might actually be a kindness. Poor Ditto is forced into sexual servitude for the benefit of eugenics.

#FreeTheDitto
 
Status
Not open for further replies.