For sword and shield, not each dlc pack within the expansion pass.
For sword and shield, not each dlc pack within the expansion pass.
Each as in both the Sword and Shield passes. You don't need both, though.
They finally pulled EA on us 50% of the game at launch rest with DLC. Nice fuck them.
They finally pulled EA on us 50% of the game at launch rest with DLC. Nice fuck them.
No, this $30 expansion pass replaces a potential $60 3rd version.They finally pulled EA on us 50% of the game at launch rest with DLC. Nice fuck them.
DLC looks good. This is the kind of content the game should have had to begin with, but at least they are trying to turn things around.
Get a fucking gripThey finally pulled EA on us 50% of the game at launch rest with DLC. Nice fuck them.
Yes, fully open world.Are the two new areas fully open-world like the wild area from the base game?
SwSh was always going to sell, but the fact that leaks mentioned "armor" way back before means they were planning on something along these lines either for the main game or before we got the game, and the other cut/shorthand features still make SwSh one of the most woefully under developed titles in the franchise.So after this direct does someone still think that SwSh is nintendoomed?
Okay then my mistake.Each as in both the Sword and Shield passes. You don't need both, though.
It's so like Nintendo to be 5 years behind, what with releasing incomplete games and charging for DLC to complete the experience.
No, that sounds about right for today's climate.It's so like Nintendo to be 5 years behind, what with releasing incomplete games and charging for DLC to complete the experience.
They mean $30 for Sword and $30 for Shield.Wait you can't purchase them separately right
Why say they're 29.99 each then(I know why)
they're expansion passes, so you would get both Armor and Crown for $30 for whatever version you choose to upgradeIs it 30$ per expansion or are they trying to say its 30 for shield/30 for sword since its technically listed as two expansions.
They also said each expansion contains different content based on the version you have. So if you want to see it all and get all the Pokemon, you need both.Pretty sure it's 30 each as in 30 for sword expansion and shield expansion, so you'd typically only need one.
LOL are you really interested in the games or you just here to bash?They finally pulled EA on us 50% of the game at launch rest with DLC. Nice fuck them.
You clearly don't know why, because it's 29.99 for the Sword version and 29.99 for the Shield version...Wait you can't purchase them separately right
Why say they're 29.99 each then(I know why)
Pretty sure it's 30 each as in 30 for sword expansion and shield expansion, so you'd typically only need one.
it did not. torna got a physical version, but there's no version with game+dlc.Xenoblade 2 did if I'm not mistaken. BotW and Splatoon did not.
Yes, 30 for the Shield version or 30 for the Sword. The pass contains both DLCs.
gamefrEAkThey finally pulled EA on us 50% of the game at launch rest with DLC. Nice fuck them.
Guess you would rather pay full 60 bucks for a 3rd versions and start from 0.
Yes, like all Nintendo expansion pass.Wait you can't purchase them separately right
Why say they're 29.99 each then(I know why)
It's so like Nintendo to be 5 years behind, what with releasing incomplete games and charging for DLC to complete the experience.
They also said each expansion contains different content based on the version you have. So if you want to see it all and get all the Pokemon, you need both.
You do know ppl will just say you should be glad they charged this instead of a $60 Version right?They finally pulled EA on us 50% of the game at launch rest with DLC. Nice fuck them.
Xenoblade 2 DLC was a different story with different playable charactersXenoblade 2 did if I'm not mistaken. BotW and Splatoon did not.