All of the semantical bickering goes away as soon as some sort of official word comes out addressing whatever happened. Whether people like the answer or not is a different can of worms but it's not wrong to express frustration over the situation in the meantime.
A mistake of incompetence can be made without a person or entity being referred to wholesale as incompetent, yes. I don't know if that's what the other poster was implying but calling this "selective unavailability" a likely matter of incompetence rather than malice is a fair assessment.