Huh. So it looks like the story out of the Sanders campaign pinning their attacks on Warren on "rogue staffers" was not true after all.
Yes, what "fun."
It certainly casts a different light on the he said/ she said situation re: a woman being elected from my POV (and that whole mess seems to have stemmed from this Sanders campaign choice too, ugh).A pattern of lying. After the vehement denials.
Just like 2016.
That's, uh, not true.Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.
Seriously? If you're in the campaign or privy to that information you should get in touch with Politico about correcting the record on this.
It is incredible that Sanders' and Warren' campaign are doing a better job at boosting Biden's chances than Biden's own campaign. Get it together guys.
I'm saying that nothing Politico offers in the story demonstrates that the talking points were "more official" (whatever that means).Seriously? If you're in the campaign or privy to that information you should get in touch with Politico about correcting the record on this.
What was being miscommunicated?
Ah ok, gotcha.I'm saying that nothing Politico offers in the story demonstrates that the talking points were "more official" (whatever that means).
For real, homeboy back in the corner likeBiden desperately trying to figure out if he is dreaming right now.
we knowI miscommunicated that I have a degree.
I in fact, do not have a degree, even though I told you I have a degree.
It really is disgusting. The defense force too.A pattern of lying. After the vehement denials.
Just like 2016.
It is incredible that Sanders' and Warren' campaign are doing a better job at boosting Biden's chances than Biden's own campaign. Get it together guys.
"people who support her are highly-educated, more affluent people who are going to show up and vote Democratic no matter what" and that "she's bringing no new bases into the Democratic Party."
He should drop out, resign the Senate, refund his salary to the tax payers, and go to work in a monastery for the rest of his life in penance to God.
From the sounds of it, it was technicallly more pro-bernie than anti anyone in particular but there were optional sections to try and convert supporters of each of the remaining candidateswait, so if i am reading this right, its anti-warren and not anti WOMEN right? I did not read in this article that he said shes un-electable because shes a women, but because of per politics.
He should drop out, resign the Senate, refund his salary to the tax payers, and go to work in a monastery for the rest of his life in penance to God.
The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign...
Or obscuring the truth if this was actually a deliberate, concerted effort by the Sanders campaign (ie, signed off by him or someone high up) to begin attacking Warren and hoping no one notices. Though it seems like a bizarre and uncharacteristic tactic from the Sanders camp to knowingly do this and then clumsily backpedal the moment it's brought to light.
Yes, but there had been an agreement between their campaigns (I'm pretty sure) not to do this sort of stuff, however accurate. Thus the response from Sanders and his campaign.
Or just stop lying?He should drop out, resign the Senate, refund his salary to the tax payers, and go to work in a monastery for the rest of his life in penance to God.