Give the middle east and african the industrial revolution so they can be same technology as the Europeans.
Give everyone a foundation of early industrial revolution and beginning to develop the scientific method. Without that, no industrial revolution is possible. Plus keep everyone at the same page.1518 is a bit too early for the industrial revolution. And back then the Ottomans were quite comfortable competing technologically with Europe, iirc.
But if you're going to give everyone an early industrial revolution (including presumably the Americas, for fairness' sake), how would you go about that? The steam engine saw early use in the 1600s, but they were not very effective and it was more convenient to use other methods.
Give everyone a foundation of early industrial revolution and beginning to develop the scientific method. Without that, no industrial revolution is possible. Plus keep everyone at the same page.
I wouldn't give them advice i will let them do what they want with it. then i go back to the future to see what happened. I know it's silly but i would let nature decide with it.So you've got 6 months of preparation to get yourself in a state where you can bring the world up to pre-industrial standards and teach the world's early researchers about the scientific method. Remember that all science is built upon earlier work. You've got to know the fundamentals else you're just learning by rote and you can't refine or re-adapt your knowledge to suit different situations. Teaching several countries advanced technological secrets also has its pitfalls, since at some point one of them is going to bump you off so they can maintain a technological advantage over their rivals. This is all assuming you don't die senselessly from unrelated causes somewhere along the line.
How would you personally spend these 6 months to prepare for your task? What advice would you give, how would you make sure it reached the people who could make use of it, and how would you ensure that your advice is fairly distributed so as not to cause a catastrophic power imbalance?
I wouldn't give them advice i will let them do what they want with it. then i go back to the future to see what happened. I know it's silly but i would let nature decide with it.
I wouldn't give them advice i will let them do what they want with it. then i go back to the future to see what happened. I know it's silly but i would let nature decide with it.
The future. The past is truly a one-way trip. The future - giving I'm time-traveling from its past - should possess improved time travel technology, as long as mankind hasn't been decimated.
That may be a big "if", of course, but I don't see that timeframe in history as very appealing.
Could you skip steam and go straight to electricity eg powered by water wheel dynamos?
Could you make wire or refine copper in the 1500s?
For the purposes of this scenario, you are not allowed to return to the present from the future, even assuming the technology is possible.
I sort of feel that deflates the notion that the future is unknowable within the scope of the question, though. I was making an assumption - even if it were ultimately false - based on having no information about the future. If the scenario is, "Travel to the future - oh, by the way, you cannot time travel again from that point", then there are a LOT of assumptions one can make as to why that is and it makes the future less enticing.
If 500 years into the future, an existing technology is not only unimproved but missing entirely, I would have to choose the past. The only assumption I can make is that we've blown ourselves to bits and I'm walking into a nuclear hellscape or something.
I would give book of history of our time then science lol. What would you do??Sorry if I'm being a pain but I'm a bit confused here, what are you giving them, is it a book?
Also unfortunately the OP stipulates it's a one way trip, so you'd be stuck without seeing the consequences of your actions.
I would give book of history of our time then science lol. What would you do??
Why the fuck would I, as a black man, want to travel 500 years into the past? lmao.
Wait, do I get to pack some bags too? Technology and weapons? If so, it seems plausible that my presence, technology and appearance would significantly alter the future. Because I'd 100% use whatever I had to prevent the beginning of the European slave trade. And with my near-magical technology, I'd be able to do it, as world leaders would want to hear what I have to say and I'd snuff out the very idea before it could be fully conceived.
This would probably result in most of you never being born.
I honestly don't see what there is to ponder. But to each their own.I disagree. I seriously pondered about this question for 3 days as if I were really forced to choose. Both options terrified me, and neither is an easy choice.
Had I removed the stipulation that you had to choose one or the other, I'm almost certain that everyone would choose neither option.
Why would you go to the past? You really wouldn't be able to change shit, stuck in a weird ass time far more backwards and fucked up than the present?
I guess it only makes sense if future means certain death.
I honestly don't see what there is to ponder. But to each their own.
As a black man there's nothing in the past I'd want to experience first hand enough to want to be stuck in a measurably worse time scientifically and philosophically
Would Era rather be forced to one-way time-travel 10 years to the past or future?
DFW - In the year 2525
The skeletal remains of Dallas-Fort Worth were visible for miles around on the clearest days. The local Tejano population had already cleared out most of the salvageable materials in the centuries following the Great Tribulation, leaving behind an empty husk for Charlie to find.
According to the village elder he spoke to in what remained of Santa Fe, the Great Tribulation was caused by the rising heat that rendered most of the Global South inhospitable to even the most hardy nomads. The changes caused a second Migration Period as refugees from as far off as the Sahel and the Middle East headed north to avoid the climate-exacerbated conflicts in their homelands. This lead to the rise of popular authoritian governments across Europe and North America that rejected the refugees and sound climate science. The ruins of the cities of his era were their handiwork.
In the centuries following his departure, Charlie saw the results of the slow, but steady recovery. Mediterranean Europe and North Africa was home to a collection of maritime city-states functioning at a Late Medieval developmental level alongside the neo-steppe nomads, whose influence ranged from the shores of the Black Sea to the borders of the Juche state.
Most of this is just things I thought of while reading the thread. Tell me what you think!