Prince William blames African population pressure for wildlife loss
The Duke of Cambridge has renewed his attack on population growth in Africa for destroying wildlife, despite having been accused of hypocrisy for making the same point while expecting his third child.At the Tusk Conservation Awards last night, the duke said: “The increasing pressure on Africa’s wild
www.thetimes.co.uk
The Duke of Cambridge has renewed his attack on the increasing impact human population is having on Africa's wildlife, despite having been accused of hypocrisy for criticising population growth while expecting his third child.
At the Tusk Conservation Awards last night the duke said: "The increasing pressure on Africa's wildlife and wild spaces as a result of human population presents a huge challenge for conservationists, as it does the world over."
Thank god the royals are concerned with the environment.
The article from this reply has some numbers:
Another important factor that Prince William failed to take into consideration, is the carbon footprint of citizens in the Global North in comparison to the Global South.
A study from Oxfam released in January 2020 found that the average British citizen is responsible for more CO2 emissions in just two weeks than a resident of any one of seven African countries in an entire year. The countries in question were: Rwanda, Malawi, Ethiopia, Uganda, Madagascar, Guinea and Burkina Faso.
For further comparison, the Eco Expert estimated the annual carbon footprint of the UK's Royal family in October this year, and found that their carbon output was a huge 3,810 tonnes, while the average Brit emits just 10 tonnes per year.
Last edited: