"Our naming convention has been around what we think the capabilities are," he continued. "Xbox 360 was about the entertainment experience around the box and the box being in the center of that entertainment experience. Xbox One, if you remember our branding early on, was 'always on input, all in one'. Those names were really built around the purpose of the box.
"I don't feel like I need to follow in their footsteps because they're kind of self-contained," Spencer concluded.
Sorry if this was answered already but....
So 360 and One were named after their capabilities but then he said this:
So he's not following in their footsteps meaning it will be NOT named after it's capabilities. Or am I misreading the whole thing?
Meaning he doesn't need to name the next Xbox "Xbox One______" to match up with the last Xbox. Each box is different so will be named accordingly
Yea that much I got but it almost sounded like it didn't have to be named after the capabilities either. So it could also be "Xbox 5" (as an example).
Xbox RT X (I think nVidia would have a problem with this).