How detailed a spec are you expecting? There will be many numbers that are not revealed until the consoles ship, and someone cracks the case, and then more when someone decaps the chip.
How detailed a spec are you expecting? There will be many numbers that are not revealed until the consoles ship, and someone cracks the case, and then more when someone decaps the chip.
Same.I am still team Klee with double digit TF.
Personal hope is 12 TF.
Mark Evan Cerny does not disappoint.
How detailed a spec are you expecting? There will be many numbers that are not revealed until the consoles ship, and someone cracks the case, and then more when someone decaps the chip.
You think? It kinda reads like it was written by a forum warrior. Instead of writing a blanaced piece, gi/biz writing an article from every conceivable angle for clicks. threadmark each and every one of them \o/
Oh, my mistake, I didn't realise they did that, or my memory is shot, which is entirely possible. Is there a link? Curious as to how much detail it goes into.If they do it like PS4 with a spec sheet afterwards they won't be much to speculate on .
not attending E3 isn't the same as not having an event in June just after MS to announce PS5.
they can still mirror 2013 without using E3 explicitly
This obsession with Sony skipping E3 as if they won't have their own media blowout is fucking annoying. Braindead journalism and exaggerated panic over some inconsequential shit. That fucking website with a dozen articles about E3 is nuts. Creatively bankrupt shit to report on.
I disagree the articles points out and ask some questions about the sudden change in marketing for Sony. It points out how the playstation experience which was a fan event was cut out recently; it alsodiscusses Sony missing many events over the last several years which goes against the precedent that was set since the beginning of the gen. It brings out the question that we all ask when it comes to change, why are we changing? I suspect personally its largely due to the difference a top ie: Andrew house Jack Trenton etcYou think? It kinda reads like it was written by a forum warrior. Instead of writing a blanaced piece, gi/biz writing an article from every conceivable angle for clicks. threadmark each and every one of them \o/
We all get used to cycles and repetition. It's just aggravating when people blow the importance of something out of proportion. We're in 2020 where all your information can be disseminated in a multitude of ways. It's easier than ever for information to spread. This feigning worry over how Sony is going to reliably relay PS5 information to the masses is misguided and disingenuous concern that has no basis in reality, considering, as I said, the many avenues through which Sony can do it. I really just dislike it when people make a big deal about shit that really isn't a big deal at all. And I say this as someone who has very fond memories of E3.I think it's more that, people are use to a certain cycle. I do find it weird they would write these and not see that it worked for NIntendo, and honestly for some publishers that do their own shows and make their own announcements outside of E3.
Yeah, it means MS could get out of the hardware business entirely.
I think it's more that, people are use to a certain cycle. I do find it weird they would write these and not see that it worked for NIntendo, and honestly for some publishers that do their own shows and make their own announcements outside of E3.
Oh, my mistake, I didn't realise they did that, or my memory is shot, which is entirely possible. Is there a link? Curious as to how much detail it goes into.
People will forget about all these so quickly once Sony starts to actually show something.
This is a totally useless article and it pretends like E3 was the reason the PS4 did well and Xbox not so when in fact it played such a minor role compared to the business decisions both Sony and Microsoft did leading up to it and would there not have been an E3 the same message and results would have played out since already then internet with YouTube, Facebook was a thing. Now in 2020 E3 that is magnified even further and Sony or Microsoft success have absolutely nothing to do with E3 but once again their business decisions.
Not sure what you're trying to say.
You know what hes saying...come on man
This obsession with Sony skipping E3 as if they won't have their own media blowout is fucking annoying. Braindead journalism and exaggerated panic over some inconsequential shit. That fucking website with a dozen articles about E3 is nuts. Creatively bankrupt shit to report on. Everything has to be some point of contention nowadays. Shit is whack.
That you are a fanboy, what I got from that.
I'm supposed to dislike a well respected publication in GI whom write fantastic articles with well vetted sources and interviews because it would like to know more on why Sony suddenly is going against Andrew house/Jack Trenton proven strategies?
Considering I actually use my ps4 more then any other system that's interesting thanks
Anyone following even in passing would know playstation have a new global approach to marketing and have staffed up accordingly. What they do and where they do it will be dictated by that. Saying they are to hold 100s of events, it seems likely they're going to do PS.VR-like hands-on demonstrations to maximise people experiencing the console, controller haptics etc. for themselves. That they're doing things differently that 7 years ago should be no shock. And they weren't there last year - it's not sudden at all, it's consistent lol.I disagree the articles points out and ask some questions about the sudden change in marketing for Sony.
I didn't tell you to like or dislike anything, i just said you know what he meant that your a fanboy, if you think your not well more power to you but it should have been obvious what he meantI'm supposed to dislike a well respedged publication in GI whom write fantastic articles with well vetted sources and interviews because it would like to know more on why Sony suddenly is going against Andrew house/Jack Trenton proven strategies?
Considering I actually use my ps4 more then any other system that's interesting thanks
Is it? It's a click bait article.
This is a totally useless article and it pretends like E3 was the reason the PS4 did well and Xbox not
I'm supposed to dislike a well respedged publication in GI whom write fantastic articles with well vetted sources and interviews because it would like to know more on why Sony suddenly is going against Andrew house/Jack Trenton proven strategies?
Considering I actually use my ps4 more then any other system that's interesting thanks
I'm supposed to dislike a well respedged publication in GI whom write fantastic articles with well vetted sources and interviews because it would like to know more on why Sony suddenly is going against Andrew house/Jack Trenton proven strategies?
The guy is a nobody who fanboys constantly believe1. This is just some random 4chan or Pastebin rumor I've seen linked in here.
2. The devkits being 18 makes no sense anyway
3. Who is this guy?
Well the purpose of the article wasn't to point out the pro and cons of going to e3, it was actually to review/point out the change in direction the post andrew house Sony is going into. For example he points out Sony axing the playstation experience which could signfiy they're trying to save moneyIf they went into the pro and cons of skipping and details why it would have been a good article.
Right now it's just the same thing repeating again like Guymelef pics shows .
That post shows exactly what they're after. They frame their own articles in many different ways to appeal for clicks. they'll have to work a lot less at this once there is some actual news to report, can't be easy or fulfilling having to do all that nonsense.If they went into the pro and cons of skipping and details why it would have been a good article.
Right now it's just the same thing repeating again like Guymelef pics shows .
It's not really about saving money, it's more that new leadership almost always makes changes to put their own stamp on a team, and to challenge conventional organizational thinking.Well the purpose of the article wasn't to point out the pro and cons of going to e3, it was actually to review/point out the change in direction the post andrew house Sony is going into. For example he points out Sony axing the playstation experience which could signfiy they're trying to save money
Sony axing the playstation experience which could signfiy they're trying to save money
And that's basically the discussion the article is having.It's not really about saving money, it's more that new leadership almost always makes changes to put their own stamp on a team, and to challenge conventional organizational thinking.
We expect a company to act one way because they always have acted that way, but that's not, in and of itself, a good reason to continue along that path.
There's plenty of time left before the PS5 launch, loads of details still unknown, and vitally, an entire lineup of games that need to be shown. And there's some evidence that what little the company has already done is working (5 million Instagram likes for a logo that was about as surprising as the PlayStation 5's name?!?), so who am I to criticize it?