Yes ZhugeEx is Daniel Ahmad, an industry analysts and he used to post and moderate here. He even vetted Klee the first time around lol.
edit: I don't think he posts on ERA anymore though :/
In this case, the whole OS would run off the 3/4GB of LPDDR3 ram. You don't need a lot of RAMfor an OS when you have a very fast SSD. And you don't need RAM with a lot of bandwidth for the kina tasks the typically does.
Either way, its cheaper having 3/4GB LPDDR3 RAM than getting two more chips of 18Gbs GDDR6 RAM that wold e wasted on the OS. And I am saying all this with regards to sony because I believe they are going to be the more price-conscious of the two. Notice I am even saying LPDDR3 and not LPDDR4/LPDDR4x/LPDDR5 which are all also available. It even possible that LPDDR4 old be cheaper than LPDDR3. In basically just substitute with the cheapest formof LPDDR
Cerny stated in 2019 that they had been working on the PS5 for 4 years, meaning that when it launches later this year, it will be a 5 year effort, nearly the entire gen.
Lends more credibility to the ps5 originally having jaguar cores.That makes things even more interesting, I wonder what Sony were thinking all the way back in 2015..
But isn't stuff that early just brainstorming stuff? I mean where was Navi and zen2 back in 2015?
They probably had early Broad goals, like ps4 BC, 10x more powerful then ps4 etc but I can't imagine actual silicon design started that early.
The SSD would be one. I highly doubt they will have the exact same designed SSD with the exact same level of speed.
The bigger issue of the X One was the DDR3 and eSRAM, not the difference in GPU TF's IMO.
Their design methodology may be different, but their costs are very likely dominated by the SSD chips themselves, which I suspect they'll likely end up using the same amount (1TB).The SSD would be one. I highly doubt they will have the exact same designed SSD with the exact same level of speed.
Lends more credibility to the ps5 originally having jaguar cores.
I don't want to speculate on that because there is a lot of information we don't know in that regard. I just think Sony's SSD will be more key to the PS5's performance than MS' SSD for SeX.Their design methodology may be different, but their costs are very likely dominated by the SSD chips themselves, which I suspect they'll likely end up using the same amount (1TB).
Sony spoked mainly of the SSD. There is also the Spidey demo and Jason telling they will communicate about instant access.Which all goes back to the point of both of them having different priorities with their tech. I think we will see the same thing with PS5 and SeX.
I don't want to speculate on that because there is a lot of information we don't know in that regard. I just think Sony's SSD will be more key to the PS5's performance than MS' SSD for SeX.
Doesn't at least part of the OS need to run off the same pool of RAM as the games? That's what I've been told here, anyway.
In hindsight, the fact Xbone launched at 599 for how weak it ended up being was ludicrous. I'm not saying history repeats itself but man they have a lot of making up to do this gen.
Don't worry. They will deliver this time!In hindsight, the fact Xbone launched at 499 for how weak it ended up being was ludicrous. I'm not saying history repeats itself but man they have a lot of making up to do this gen.
Maybe they are not just thinking of the BoM, but also the fact that increasing the form factor would also likely increase shipping costs and storage costs. Maybe spending a bit more on a more efficient cooling solution could give benefits in this area and make the console more visually appealing.Seems pretty silly to spend time and money on this fancy double sided cooling when they could of done the painfully obvious thing of just making the box bigger like MS did.
MS seem to have a first principles design approach, where they just did the most simple and obvious thing.
Panos Panay runs Microsoft devices. I don't know how much of a hand he had in Xbox but he has had a hand in the surface line, new dual screens like the neo and duo.If we look at the history of this gen, the PS4 cost less at retail than Xbone and was more powerful.
This was due to Cerny and Sony's R&D, I believe. I doubt they get better discounts than MS. So this just tells us it's not outside the realm of possibilty that price does not equate to power.
In fact, the converse is true when comparing it to this gen. I would also just say that, with the console being pricier (PS5) I do believe Sony is using that manufacture cost effectively. I'm not as familiar with the System Architect at MS. But Cerny is brilliant and I have quite a lot of faith in him (this is by no means a factual statement just a personal one)
? I buy games all the time using remote play or the phone app. Not sure what the distinction is
also for the sake of clarity it was asked how could Sony compete against MS launching GamePass on Samsung phones and my answer is that they could just do the same thing with PSNow. I'm just confused on why the MS offering is so uniquely special that other competitors wouldn't be able to counter or compete.
Yep. You gotta pick the exact date to avoid my shenanigansTransistor
Let's say the PS5 reveal in like April. Do I still get the embarrassing avatar because I said it in May?
Yes, getting it wrong means you lose, whether you undershoot it or overshoot it.Transistor
Let's say the PS5 reveal in like April. Do I still get the embarrassing avatar because I said it in May?
Maybe they are not just thinking of the BoM, but also the fact that increasing the form factor would also likely increase shipping costs and storage costs. Maybe spending a bit more on a more efficient cooling solution could give benefits in this area and make the console more visually appealing.
In hindsight, the fact Xbone launched at 499 for how weak it ended up being was ludicrous. I'm not saying history repeats itself but man they have a lot of making up to do this gen.
So now there are rumors on Twitter that the PS5 is 8T. What the hell is going on here? Has Sony really fucked up? No news is really making people stir crazy.
🤣So now there are rumors on Twitter that the PS5 is 8T. What the hell is going on here? Has Sony really fucked up? No news is really making people stir crazy.
It's that time again. A simple night tonight. Only one sacrifice.
495 your time has come. For the crime of sillily selecting a weekend for this PS5 reveal, I give into you an avatar of equally silly proportions.
Here you are, my friend. Once more unto the breach...
And with that, I'ma go drink.
I don't see why the OS needs to take up any significant portion of RAM in both pools for a split RAM scenario.
Microsoft and Sony have talked about the same things. 4K, 8K, ray tracing, SSD, load times, better framerates.Sony spoked mainly of the SSD. There is also the Spidey demo and Jason telling they will communicate about instant access.
MS mainly talked about framerate.
Ok. I wasn't sure if the e19 was confirmed.
And when bloomberg has been sued and exposed for fabricating stories as recently as the past year.
France's AMF watchdog fines Bloomberg €5 million over Vinci hoax
France's markets watchdog AMF said on Monday it had fined U.S. news agency Bloomberg News 5 million euros ($5.5 million) for publishing a hoax press release relating to construction group Vinci <SGEF.PA> in November 2016.www.reuters.com
iTWire - Bloomberg reporters stand to earn bonuses if chip story holds up
The Bloomberg story, claiming chips are being implanted by a Chinese contractor on server motherboards sold by US firm Supermicro Computer and being used to spy on some companies, will benefit reporters Jordan Robertson and Michael Riley — who wrote it — if it holds up under scrutiny. The...www.itwire.com
I've been explicitly told that it does. I think it was DrKeo who was telling me this ages ago but I may be wrong.
Wasn't me :)I've been explicitly told that it does. I think it was DrKeo who was telling me this ages ago but I may be wrong.
So now there are rumors on Twitter that the PS5 is 8T. What the hell is going on here? Has Sony really fucked up? No news is really making people stir crazy.
Wait are we really saying that Bloomberg is a less reliable than a forum poster...
Yeah, I don't get it either. Bloomberg's track record is impeccable.lol
Clearly the Bloomberg article isn't going along with their confirmation bias. So they decide it's inaccurate.
Don't get it, a journalist is a journalist regardless on their publication method. If online journalists can be doubted, then surely a paper-one can as well.Yeah, I don't get it either. Bloomberg's track record is impeccable.
This speaks to the integrity of their editorial staff. When confronted with contradicting evidence, not only did they not retract the story, they submitted it for a journalism award. Surprisingly, it didn't win.Don't get it, a journalist is a journalist regardless on their publication method. If online journalists can be doubted, then surely a paper-one can as well.
Yeah, I don't get it either. Bloomberg's track record is impeccable.
Yes, you can. They do the integrity thing and post apologies and retractions, though. To gloss over one of the biggest journalism fuckups of the past decades is something, though.Well done.
You can probably find errors on every single major news outlet ever...
Bloomberg are pretty reliable so I'm gonna take their word over random internet speculators for now.
Journalists do make mistakes. But if you think there's no rejecting of that article because it doesn't fit some of the posters confirmation bias then I don't know what to tell you 🤷♀️
"Random internet speculators". You're calling online journalists random internet speculators? 🤣Well done.
You can probably find errors on every single major news outlet ever...
Bloomberg are pretty reliable so I'm gonna take their word over random internet speculators for now.
Journalists do make mistakes. But if you think there's no rejecting of that article because it doesn't fit some of the posters confirmation bias then I don't know what to tell you 🤷♀️