If it's 13TF they should launch on November 13, 2020 - it's a Friday. Friday the 13TF (thirteenthf).A new team? I'm down.
13tf just seems so.....extra.
What the hell, #TeamTommy. I don't have anything else to lose.
If it's 13TF they should launch on November 13, 2020 - it's a Friday. Friday the 13TF (thirteenthf).A new team? I'm down.
13tf just seems so.....extra.
What the hell, #TeamTommy. I don't have anything else to lose.
Not for me. Only buying PS5, plus without pricing there's nothing to even consider at the moment.For anyone who had just planned to purchase the PS5 has this XSX reveal made you consider getting the XSX as well?
No worries, and we have no idea what Sony's plans are on whether or not they're going to delay it, in fact at the end of the loading demo for the xsx it still said "coming holiday 2020" despite the COVID-19 epidemic, i honestly believe that if MS isn't going to have any delays then neither will Sony, god knows Sony doesn't want another repeat of the PS3 launch again, so if Sony is going to release the PS5 as planned in holiday 2020 then i see no problem in them revealing the specs to us just like MS.
Demon Souls remake on launch or i'll storm into Sonys HQ with an angry letter.I agree that if there is a delay it will be both, and I don't think that is the case. I really hope as much as you do that the specs will be revealed and most of all the PS5 launch games. Possible launch games are what I'm most interested in knowing. Hopefully the wait is not long!
Definitely looks like a system I'd love to own. But it's all about the games for me, and Microsoft has very few first party titles that appeal to me, so nope.For anyone who had just planned to purchase the PS5 has this XSX reveal made you consider getting the XSX as well?
just saw that the xbox one power supply is only 300w. thats 45w less than the ps3 power supply. its higher than the 245w power supply of the one x but we are looking at a 200w console max.
sony can easily target that 200w number.
also, shows how richard was off with his 350w console predictions.
The games are the bigger doubt in my mind rather than the consoles in terms of delays.I agree that if there is a delay it will be both, and I don't think that is the case. I really hope as much as you do that the specs will be revealed and most of all the PS5 launch games. Possible launch games are what I'm most interested in knowing. Hopefully the wait is not long!
just saw that the xbox one power supply is only 300w. thats 45w less than the ps3 power supply. its higher than the 245w power supply of the one x but we are looking at a 200w console max.
sony can easily target that 200w number.
also, shows how richard was off with his 350w console predictions.
Agreed, funny how if you're spot on all but one thing you get crucified.I'd say guessing within 5 kHz is pretty damn good. He said 1.82 GHz on Dec 14.
He mentions the hellblade trailer in this new feature around the 16 minute mark.In engine is not very good indicator as image quality can be increased well beyond what is plausible with interactive framerate.
Simple use of accumulation buffer and most image quality and post effect problems are gone. (AA, DoF and motion blur.)
He mentions the hellblade trailer in this new feature around the 16 minute mark.
I edited it.
For anyone who had just planned to purchase the PS5 has this XSX reveal made you consider getting the XSX as well?
I really don't think so. It was widely speculated, yeah but not as precise as the Oberon tests.GitHub always showed active CUs, 36 for Oberon and 56 for Arden.
If the leak is remarkably specific about the PlayStation 5's basic GPU specification, where does this leave Xbox Series X? As we understand it, the documents consist of fragments from a much larger data set that we don't get to see.
There is mention of a processor referred to as Arden, which is a highly likely candidate for Xbox Series X silicon. However, there is nowhere near as much testing done on this - or the data simply isn't up to date enough to include Arden validation testing of any note
However, the documentation for both processors is very different and can't be directly compared. A lot of AMD's validation testing for the PS5 'Oberon' processor is in the leak, whereas the Series X data is best described as somewhat patchy by comparison.
With caveats in place, the sparse data in the leak includes mention of 3584 shaders, which would translate to a frankly ginormous processor with 56 active compute units. There is no sign of clock-speeds in the data
The AMD leak does seem to confirm memory bandwidth for the Arden chip at 560GB/s.
If they have some breathing room left in power supply and cooling solution, sure.
If Klee comes back, does Transistor get to give him a new avatar?Klee, Klee self-banned did he
The threads are split
Gone are those who attack
So I summon thee
Klee please come back!
You quoted it yourself. It lists the number of active shader units. That is how the number of active CU is determined. Same exact story for the Oberon tests.I really don't think so. It was widely speculated, yeah but not as precise as the Oberon tests.
It's clear Arden data is no where near comprehensive as ps5's one, not where does it fully states all 56 CUs are active like it does for ps5.
Oh and also:
So in conclusion the full spec reveal is another very damming evidence that GH was spot on despite being incomplete data.
For anyone who had just planned to purchase the PS5 has this XSX reveal made you consider getting the XSX as well?
I'd have to vote "yes" on that.If Klee comes back, does Transistor get to give him a new avatar?
PS3 was in some way like the Atari Jaguar. Both claimed to have extraordinary power but both featured very weak CPU and were very difficult to work on.Ehh, PS3 vs 360 was basically a wash.
The PS3 Cell CPU could do GPU-like stuff, but it functioned worse than the Xenon when it came to traditional CPU tasks. Not to mention the PS3's weaker GPU and inferior RAM setup. You had to do a ton of extra work to get the Cell to perform like the Xenon, then you had to do additional work to have the Cell pick up the slack for the weak GPU.
You could do some unique things with the Cell (Uncharted 3's ship physics), but I wouldn't say that the 360 was weaker. Look at the Bethesda save system controversy for an example where the 360 had a clear hardware advantage.
Demon Souls remake on launch or i'll storm into Sonys HQ with an angry letter.
The games are the bigger doubt in my mind rather than the consoles in terms of delays.
China is back online so they can make the boxes, but the western world is facing lock downs and all the rest of it and whilst many can work from home there will unquestionably be a lot of lost hours.
GitHub always showed active CUs, 36 for Oberon and 56 for Arden.
I really don't think so. It was widely speculated, yeah but not as precise as the Oberon tests.
From DF:
It's clear Arden data is no where near comprehensive as ps5's one, not where does it fully states all 56 CUs are active like it does for ps5.
Oh and also:
So in conclusion the full spec reveal is another very damming evidence that GH was spot on despite being incomplete data.
I don't think it really matters in MS's case because they have a history of activating the whole chip for the development kit. For instance, the One X has 44/44 active CUs in the dev kit but 40/44 in the final console. This one is on us, the Github speculators, who didn't think of the option that 56 active CUs could be the dev-kit and the final machine will have 52 CUs. It's our bad, but understandable considering the Github leak didn't have TF count or clock speed.You quoted it yourself. It lists the number of active shader units. That is how the number of active CU is determined. Same exact story for the Oberon tests.
Worst thing about GitHub? Still using python 2.7 lmao
Just PS5 speculation now?... How much longer can this thread continue?
Latest rumblings suggest that Bluepoint are rebooting Castlevania and making a 3D Symphony of the Night.
If true I will nut when they announce it.
Sony does state of play for PS5 news.
Shows logo again.
Announces preorders open.
$399 price.
Video ends.
#can be cmodel, FunctionOnly or regression
RunType = cmodel
#tserver code tree related.
TserverTreePath = /home/withheld/ariel/oberon-cmodel_bc1-build/oberon_a0-x86_64-linux-dbg-lite
...
....
#target file
CSVFile = oberonA0_regression_result_BC1.xlsm
...
With things slowing down for a month or so (could be more) I dont think it would be out of the norm to delay the release until spring 2021 for both systems.Yes, it's something I've been thinking about. Hopefully this nightmare will pass soon.
Code:#can be cmodel, FunctionOnly or regression RunType = cmodel #tserver code tree related. TserverTreePath = /home/withheld/ariel/oberon-cmodel_bc1-build/oberon_a0-x86_64-linux-dbg-lite ... .... #target file CSVFile = oberonA0_regression_result_BC1.xlsm ...
Some results are just a model. The target file listed is the same name as one of the few files people commonly discuss.
For anyone who had just planned to purchase the PS5 has this XSX reveal made you consider getting the XSX as well?
Official US prices from LG press release:
2020 LG OLED 4K TV
GX "Gallery" Series
OLED77GXPUA
77-inch class (76.7 inches diagonal)
$5,999
Available April 2020
OLED65GXPUA
65-inch class (64.5 inches diagonal)
$3,499
Available April 2020
OLED55GXPUA
55-inch class (54.6 inches diagonal)
$2,499
Available April 2020
BX Series
OLED65BXPUA
65-inch class (64.5 inches diagonal)
$2,299
Available May 2020
OLED55BXPUA
55-inch class
$1,599
Available May 2020
CX Series
OLED77CXPUA
77-inch class (76.7 inches diagonal)
$4,999
Available May 2020
OLED65CXPUA
65-inch class (64.5 inches diagonal)
$2,799
Available April 2020
OLED55CXPUA
55-inch class (54.6 inches diagonal)
$1,799
Available March 2020
OLED48CXPUB
48-inch class (47.5 inches diagonal
$1,499
Available June 2020
WX "Wallpaper"
OLED65WXPUA
65-inch class (64.5 inches diagonal)
$4,999
June 2020
2020 LG OLED SIGNATURE 8K TVs
ZX "Real 8K" Series
OLED88ZXPUA
88-inch class (87.6 inches diagonal)
$29,999
Available May 2020
OLED77ZXPUA
77-inch class (76.7 inches diagonal)
$19,999
Available May 2020
EDIT: Source https://markets.businessinsider.com...ins-rollout-of-2020-oled-tv-lineup-1029001150
But the question is, does that information change anything?Some results are just a model. The target file listed is the same name as one of the few files people commonly discuss.
Oberon A0 appears to be presilicon cmodel and Oberon B0 post silicon results.
Indicates Oberon_B0 was the first physical chip. Beyond that, not sure what else.
lol nope, they have impressive tech but it's all about the games for me. Microsoft's offerings are rarely to my liking so I'd need to see something changing on that front, a couple impressive kick ass platformers might do the trick... I am sick and tired of shooty bang bangs.For anyone who had just planned to purchase the PS5 has this XSX reveal made you consider getting the XSX as well?
For anyone who had just planned to purchase the PS5 has this XSX reveal made you consider getting the XSX as well?
Some results are just a model. The target file listed is the same name as one of the few files people commonly discuss.
Oberon A0 appears to be presilicon cmodel and Oberon B0 post silicon results.
Indicates Oberon_B0 was the first physical chip. Beyond that, not sure what else.
It clearly was. I posted the relevant bits of the code and the name of the excel file. OberonA0 fill presilicon, Oberon B0 fits post silicon columns. The OberonA0 is cmodel as seen in code.
I really don't think so. It was widely speculated, yeah but not as precise as the Oberon tests.
From DF:
It's clear Arden data is no where near comprehensive as ps5's one, not where does it fully states all 56 CUs are active like it does for ps5.
Oh and also:
So in conclusion the full spec reveal is another very damming evidence that GH was spot on despite being incomplete data.