If MS are charging money for a product, that product deserves to be reviewed in its release state, which is what IGN did. It's far from a "disservice", it's the opposite. They could have waited a few weeks / months / however long until these improvements and more were in place - they didn't. That isn't IGN's fault.
I honestly think the review is justified if for no other reason than to inform customers due to how hard MS is pushing it. The EA and GP arguments go out the window IMO when the platform holder gives it premium advertising space and bundling it as a value add for the holiday season. Also I wouldn't expect more than 1 or 2 updates. The versions of Destiny and The Division that got reviewed are literally unplayable along with others highly likely to get patches such as NMS and MCC.
I'll post some impressions later if this thread is still open lol. I play a ton of shooters on PC and console but haven't touched this yet in any capacity. I have an X. How is the game running post patches on a Xbox One S? Most of what I've read is from owners of the X.
IGN needs to keep pace with the current state of the game. The version of thr game they reviewed was only a available for a few days before patches came out.
If IGN wants the web traffic and click rate from reviewing game preview games they owe it to their readers to keep the reviews up to date to reflect the current state of the game.
Or better yet don't freaking assign a score to a game that might change multiple times a week.
The reviews are a disservice when the reviews quickly no longer reflects the state of the game.
If a site wants to start getting in the business of reviewing early access games they better update that review quickly after each patch.
Early access is not new and is a different category of game where it is understood and clearly communicated that the game is not complete. If you buy it you know what you are getting into. Its a playable pre order
I am very much against this move..
- Weapon recoil reduced across the board (Xbox Only)
There is nothing wrong with the 5/10 review, they released an unfinished game and it will be scored as such. Early access is marketing so it does not sound like unfinished game. When it hits 1.0 then a proper review could be suitable.
If MS are charging money for a product, that product deserves to be reviewed in its release state, which is what IGN did. It's far from a "disservice", it's the opposite. They could have waited a few weeks / months / however long until these improvements and more were in place - they didn't. That isn't IGN's fault.
This is what I think is a bit ridiculous. Having an article discussing the state of the game is perfectly reasonable, scoring it is pointless though and is there purely for clicks.
Early access literally means unfinished gameThere is nothing wrong with the 5/10 review, they released an unfinished game and it will be scored as such. Early access is marketing so it does not sound like unfinished game. When it hits 1.0 then a proper review could be suitable.
Yeah I'm in the same boat. Hopefully the reduction is minimal. Can anyone that's played the patches version give impressions on how much it's reduced?
Tested a tommy, m16 and ak. No resistance from me just let them buck freely.
http://xboxclips.com/Wesley+S+Shark/31abe719-90bb-4e9b-a548-1d74346eacd8
The recoil is far more predictable now.
Ended up with two kills with the Tommy gun before going to drown myself (wanted to test before I left for work this morning). Felt like a laser lol.
It still seems to have a decent amount of recoil in full auto, it would still be hard to control at long distances. So single fire will still be the way to go for sure. Im not the best at aiming, but I also dont want someone to be able to just full auto melt me from far away either.Can't watch the video right now but I'm not liking what I'm reading here.
Full auto still has recoil for sure but instead of wobbling all over it seems to be more vertical, which is way easier to counterbalance with thumbsticks.It still seems to have a decent amount of recoil in full auto, it would still be hard to control at long distances. So single fire will still be the way to go for sure. Im not the best at aiming, but I also dont want someone to be able to just full auto melt me from far away either.
judging from this and other threads on PUBG performance/review I'm starting to think that that we the console gamers simply cannot handle an early access program. I can understand why Sony does not allow it on Playstation.
Personally I'm fine with the IGN 5, it's not a big deal afterall: the game is fun-packed and already functional. At this point with a million PUBG copies out in the wild we have already have a solid and it seems to me very passionate PUBG xbox community: I can get all the game information I need from the forum and my personal experience.
Ok... maybe I need some DF measurements and hard numbers to avoid placebo effects :\
It still seems to have a decent amount of recoil in full auto, it would still be hard to control at long distances. So single fire will still be the way to go for sure. Im not the best at aiming, but I also dont want someone to be able to just full auto melt me from far away either.
Launch the game. If it asks you to update then update. If it doesn't, you're on the latest version. Won't let you play without the latest version.
They should definitely do another one for this patch, as they stated that next week won't see a new one.I think the patches are coming too fast. DF just did a video for the first patch yesterday and it's already out of date. I don't think it's worth the work for them trying to keep up!
Sure about that? i was able to play without having the last patch installed. Only found out it wasnt installed when I watched a Youtube video. I had to unistall game and reinstall it for patch to take effect.
Sure about that? i was able to play without having the last patch installed. Only found out it wasnt installed when I watched a Youtube video. I had to unistall game and reinstall it for patch to take effect.
My apologies maybe I should have been more clear :) Yes, I didnt have the UI update part. Here is the video that made me aware
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52HvMSh-SAE
Wonder when IGN is going to update their review? If they want to review a game preview game which will be constantly patched they need to update their review to reflect all the changes game preview games go through in a short time.
Glad to see PUBG and MS taking the state of this game seriously.
Shooting feels much better and people are easier to hit. Still janky though. The input lag needs major tlc
Technically Sony does allow it, they just don't attach a label to it. Both Fortnite and Paragon are early access games.
Based on what the game's engine is simulating, it should be tough. Firing off a volley of shots into the distance while standing straight and getting shot at, it should be extremely difficult. I ended up hitting someone multiple times without trying doing just that.Glad to see the recoil is smaller, long range combat was pretty tough.
Xbox players have handled it just fine for two years. I'm not going to speculate on where all this mania is coming from.judging from this and other threads on PUBG performance/review I'm starting to think that that we the console gamers simply cannot handle an early access program. I can understand why Sony does not allow it on PlayStation.