Ahh, the good ol' Streisand Effect in action I see! I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong by doing this...
And in those 74 years it NEVER got anything wrong! I think you keep missing my point. I do tend to believe the story, but I'm baffled by your confidence. It seems like you have a personal vendetta against David Cage or something.You asked as to where the confidence is coming from, and I answered already. Twice. Le Monde is a 74-year old newspaper, so that should answer your other question, despite it being completely stupid.
I don't understand QD reaction on this.
If you have 3 media outlets who spoke about a bad working environnement in you company : you fix it !
QD will loose in court but they want to brag about this because they think it's damaging their reputation.
Cage is a weirdo. But the game looks great and Cage doesn't own it. I wanna play it asap.
Do video game such widely important topic in France? Would any mistake affect their credibility later on? (seriously asking I have no idea)You asked as to where the confidence is coming from, and I answered already. Twice. Le Monde is a 74-year old newspaper, so that should answer your other question, despite it being completely stupid.
Defamation is pretty serious if these allegations turns out to be false and false sources can happen. Quantic Dream believes the allegations are false, so they are within their right to sue them.,
So let me be more specific. These three newspapers NEVER got anything wrong? Where does you blind confidence (bordering on blind faith) is coming from.
You are REALLY generalizing here. LOL!Yeah. I think it's half 'I am a nutty console partisan, this looks bad for Sony, let me circle the wagons' and half 'I am an objectively terrible person; I have problems with women, time to defend the dude'.
It's gross.
You are taking my comment out of context. What I said is exactly the reason I TEND TO BELIEVE THIS STORY. That was specific question to that one poster.You said above that you aren't defending him and yet you're trying to use this terrible strawman argument (he didn't say what you're claiming).
When 3 reputable newspapers with various sources, including photographic evidence bolstering the claims, come out with a story about someone who is previously known to produce questionable content... what's the saying? Where there's smoke?
Considering the kind of shit he has written in the past, and the fact that he has already admitted a bunch of the allegations are true but claimed they "weren't a big deal" I'd say people are right on the money.
Mediapart is a relatively new player (about 10 years old), but insofar, yes, they rarely do.Plus, in any scenario - do newspapers in France really NEVER get anything wrong?
Guess the fake news narrative is here in the gaming side now too. lol Guess all the journalists hate David Cage, who is completely innocent and never made questionable content before. Let's ignore all the evidence too - a guy making a videogame I want can't possibly lie, right.
Yeah. I think it's half 'I am a nutty console partisan, this looks bad for Sony, let me circle the wagons' and half 'I am an objectively terrible person; I have problems with women, time to defend the dude'.
It's gross.
The employees claims were ruled against but I think that was only 2 of 3 so one might still be going. However there probably isn't much reported on those since it would be a privacy concern for the employee.Can't seem to find a link, but wasn't there news of a court dropping several of the charges against Quantic Dream, which was surprising given that French courts normally side with the employees? Cant' seem to find a link, but I remember someone talking about it.
Didn't the story suggest that pretty much everyone working at Quantic Dream is an asshole?David Cage is a joke, feel bad for the team and the people working in Quantic Dream.
Please stop this. You can believe the journalists or criticize David Cage without making ridiculous generalizations and personal attacks.Yeah. I think it's half 'I am a nutty console partisan, this looks bad for Sony, let me circle the wagons' and half 'I am an objectively terrible person; I have problems with women, time to defend the dude'.
It's gross.
He makes video games that some people don't like, ergo, he must be humiliated at every point. There cannot be thread without open attack on him.... Even here on Era mods are allowing it.Why people so quick to jump on any topic regarding QD and Cage? Even before this scandal some people unbelievably hate him for some reason?
It takes a lot of confidence from Quantic Dream to jump into a lawsuit over this - especially give the pedigree of the outlets they're taking to court. It will be very interesting to see how this pans out.
If you're not fond of David Cage as it seems a lot of people here aren't, this lawsuit could even further legitimize the accusations and possibly bring legal ramifications against the studio, which would be much needed if the accusations are true.
On the other hand, if it's found that the articles aren't accurate and that the proper journalistic steps weren't taken, then it helps clear the air around the studio.
I'm sure everyone will wait for due process before jumping to any conclusions, of course.
Canard PC's co-founder Ivan 'Le Fou' Gaudé wrote a small piece regarding the QD investigation. Still behind a paywall, though the main lines are:
- At first, their goal was to draw a global picture of the French video game industry, more specifically working conditions. It wasn't targeting any company, but the name Quantic Dream was too recurring to not have a specific interest about what's going on there.
- They also soon realized that Le Monde was also investigating. So, instead of "walking on each other feet" and turning it into a "race", they joined forces.
- One key date was the 22nd of December of 2017, day where a hearing at the labor relations board (five former QD employees vs. the company) was happening. Also, Canard PC needed to wrap things up before the 5th of January, day they had to send their newspaper to the printer.
- The 26th of December, they (Canard PC, Mediapart & Le Monde) sent their joined questions list to Quantic Dream's board so QD could be aware about the investigation, the data collected but also what the accusations the outlets had towards QD.
- Meeting the 4th of January with QD's board (David Cage & Guillaume de Fondaumière) that Ivan Gaudé qualifies as "tense".
- Following that meeting, several emails form QD qualified as "extremely virulent", accusing the journalists of defamation, insults and harassment above some other things. Few days after, a letter from a law firm threatening them on behalf of QD (at that point, nothing was published yet).
- Mediapart & Canard PC gathered 20 testimonies from former but also current employees (including some that are happy there or left but without hard feelings). IIRC, Le Monde has around 15 testimonies (maybe some in common of course).
- They refused to give names of these employees but they know them all, verified all of them. They just don't want to destroy their careers, given how small the industry in France is.
It takes a lot of confidence from Quantic Dream to jump into a lawsuit over this - especially give the pedigree of the outlets they're taking to court. It will be very interesting to see how this pans out.
If you're not fond of David Cage as it seems a lot of people here aren't, this lawsuit could even further legitimize the accusations and possibly bring legal ramifications against the studio, which would be much needed if the accusations are true.
On the other hand, if it's found that the articles aren't accurate and that the proper journalistic steps weren't taken, then it helps clear the air around the studio.
I'm sure everyone will wait for due process before jumping to any conclusions, of course.
It still baffles me how people here excuse/don't care that QD violated Ellen Page's no nudity clause.
All of the allegations against the company feel pretty in line with their past behavior.
That's not how you do a cover up. If anything it will bring more attention.
This is funny to me because it assumes there areare o two possibilities.
If QD finds one thing that was slightly misrepresented or not entirely accurate, that doesn't negate everything else.
This is a PR move, plain and simple. For the QD Defense Force to rally around.
No it didn't.Didn't the story suggest that pretty much everyone working at Quantic Dream is an asshole?
I don't see why they would sue the news outlets, and drag out the scrutiny they will receive, if they thought the reporting was based entirely on fact.
This is a good step towards establishing what the actual truth is, in any case.
1. Yes. The reporting remains credible, regardless of Cage's hissy fit.
2. David Cage inserted a meaningless 'shower scene' into a game. But even that is not enough for him; he had a nude model constructed to go along with it. As opposed to, you know, not rendering stuff that is not actively used by the game.
Stuff like that points to Cage being a creep, which people have been saying for years.
Character models with realistic skin textures are standard practice for lead characters, even if the character is clothed. The textures are probably derived from another model. I don't think this really constitutes misogyny on anyone's part.