• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Kainé

Member
Oct 26, 2017
623
This isn't a bad thing. The court will clear it all out.

I don't think newspapers are wrong, I just think that they used a wrong source without investigate properly... or may be is true all the claims.

Let's see how it ends.
 

resident_UA

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
1,400
You asked as to where the confidence is coming from, and I answered already. Twice. Le Monde is a 74-year old newspaper, so that should answer your other question, despite it being completely stupid.
And in those 74 years it NEVER got anything wrong! I think you keep missing my point. I do tend to believe the story, but I'm baffled by your confidence. It seems like you have a personal vendetta against David Cage or something.
 

Deleted member 2793

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,368
Guess the fake news narrative is here in the gaming side now too. lol Guess all the journalists hate David Cage, who is completely innocent and never made questionable content before. Let's ignore all the evidence too - a guy making a videogame I want can't possibly lie, right.
 

Quakeguy

Banned
Feb 3, 2018
938
I don't understand QD reaction on this.
If you have 3 media outlets who spoke about a bad working environnement in you company : you fix it !

QD will loose in court but they want to brag about this because they think it's damaging their reputation.

Of course those 3 media outlets got the same word file from the senders.
If they are lying, or if if QD is lying, remains to see.
 

Zetran

Member
Oct 25, 2017
329
You asked as to where the confidence is coming from, and I answered already. Twice. Le Monde is a 74-year old newspaper, so that should answer your other question, despite it being completely stupid.
Do video game such widely important topic in France? Would any mistake affect their credibility later on? (seriously asking I have no idea)
 

Alderade

Member
Oct 27, 2017
189
Defamation is pretty serious if these allegations turns out to be false and false sources can happen. Quantic Dream believes the allegations are false, so they are within their right to sue them.,

This is the difference between law and morality. With all the stories about a bad working environnement in this industry, QD reaction said a lot about how they manage the company.
 

Sutton Dagger

Member
Oct 27, 2017
741
So let me be more specific. These three newspapers NEVER got anything wrong? Where does you blind confidence (bordering on blind faith) is coming from.

You said above that you aren't defending him and yet you're trying to use this terrible strawman argument (he didn't say what you're claiming).
When 3 reputable newspapers with various sources, including photographic evidence bolstering the claims, come out with a story about someone who is previously known to produce questionable content... what's the saying? Where there's smoke?
 

Deleted member 35598

User requested account closure
Banned
Dec 7, 2017
6,350
Spain
LOL !
This is just a PR move before the release of Detroit in order to give the impression they are the victims. I don't buy it.

Le Monde and Mediapart are reknown for their excellent investigative work. So I'll side with them.
 

resident_UA

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
1,400
You said above that you aren't defending him and yet you're trying to use this terrible strawman argument (he didn't say what you're claiming).
When 3 reputable newspapers with various sources, including photographic evidence bolstering the claims, come out with a story about someone who is previously known to produce questionable content... what's the saying? Where there's smoke?
You are taking my comment out of context. What I said is exactly the reason I TEND TO BELIEVE THIS STORY. That was specific question to that one poster.
 
Jan 10, 2018
7,207
Tokyo
The amount of lies from reputable journalists, and all the fake proofs that it would require, make me very doubtful that these article were untrue or even inaccurate. It is most likely a PR move, and in this case is adding insult to injury.
 

Alienous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,605
I don't see why they would sue the news outlets, and drag out the scrutiny they will receive, if they thought the reporting was based entirely on fact.

This is a good step towards establishing what the actual truth is, in any case.
 

addik

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,527
Can't seem to find a link, but wasn't there news of a court dropping several of the charges against Quantic Dream, which was surprising given that French courts normally side with the employees? Cant' seem to find a link, but I remember someone talking about it.
 

HBK

Member
Oct 30, 2017
7,982
Plus, in any scenario - do newspapers in France really NEVER get anything wrong?
Mediapart is a relatively new player (about 10 years old), but insofar, yes, they rarely do.

They released a number of hot papers on various scandals and always do so well prepared, as in with everything ready for justice in case they would be sued.

"Everything" meaning records, documents, testimonies, etc. They usually don't release a paper if it's not rock solid.

Doesn't mean they can't get anything wrong, but they're the kind that do their homework (so far at least).
 

eseqko

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,390
Guess the fake news narrative is here in the gaming side now too. lol Guess all the journalists hate David Cage, who is completely innocent and never made questionable content before. Let's ignore all the evidence too - a guy making a videogame I want can't possibly lie, right.

In his defense, he did say he couldn't be racist or misogynist since he worked on games with Jesse Williams and Ellen Page. Case closed, the press is lying.

/s
 

Zetran

Member
Oct 25, 2017
329
Yeah. I think it's half 'I am a nutty console partisan, this looks bad for Sony, let me circle the wagons' and half 'I am an objectively terrible person; I have problems with women, time to defend the dude'.

It's gross.

Why people so quick to jump on any topic regarding QD and Cage? Even before this scandal some people unbelievably hate him for some reason?

This is really great actually. No way the court could be impartial. if the allegation is true then QD is as bad as it sounds and if not then life goes on...
 

Wereroku

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,244
Can't seem to find a link, but wasn't there news of a court dropping several of the charges against Quantic Dream, which was surprising given that French courts normally side with the employees? Cant' seem to find a link, but I remember someone talking about it.
The employees claims were ruled against but I think that was only 2 of 3 so one might still be going. However there probably isn't much reported on those since it would be a privacy concern for the employee.
 

daybreak

Member
Feb 28, 2018
2,415
It takes a lot of confidence from Quantic Dream to jump into a lawsuit over this - especially give the pedigree of the outlets they're taking to court. It will be very interesting to see how this pans out.

If you're not fond of David Cage as it seems a lot of people here aren't, this lawsuit could even further legitimize the accusations and possibly bring legal ramifications against the studio, which would be much needed if the accusations are true.

On the other hand, if it's found that the articles aren't accurate and that the proper journalistic steps weren't taken, then it helps clear the air around the studio.

I'm sure everyone will wait for due process before jumping to any conclusions, of course.
 

Mass_Pincup

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
7,129
Yeah not smart to sue some of the best newspaper in the country.

Hope they're prepared to face their probable loss in court.
 

Morrigan

Spear of the Metal Church
Member
Oct 24, 2017
34,359
Yeah. I think it's half 'I am a nutty console partisan, this looks bad for Sony, let me circle the wagons' and half 'I am an objectively terrible person; I have problems with women, time to defend the dude'.

It's gross.
Please stop this. You can believe the journalists or criticize David Cage without making ridiculous generalizations and personal attacks.
 

DieH@rd

Member
Oct 26, 2017
10,568
French defamation laws are intense [and commonly used], I'm not surprised they are suing, but most likely nothing will come out of it.

Why people so quick to jump on any topic regarding QD and Cage? Even before this scandal some people unbelievably hate him for some reason?
He makes video games that some people don't like, ergo, he must be humiliated at every point. There cannot be thread without open attack on him.... Even here on Era mods are allowing it.
 
Oct 25, 2017
17,537
It still baffles me how people here excuse/don't care that QD violated Ellen Page's no nudity clause.

All of the allegations against the company feel pretty in line with their past behavior.
 

sensui-tomo

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,629
Was wondering what happened with the case when i saw the game went gold, guess QD didnt want me to forget it either by sueing them.
 

Funkallero

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,791
Tokyo
Suing newspapers for slandering/defamation is pretty common in France.
Lots of politicians or public figures involved in affairs revealed by the press bring them to court.
I'm not surprised by this move.
 
Oct 25, 2017
13,246
It takes a lot of confidence from Quantic Dream to jump into a lawsuit over this - especially give the pedigree of the outlets they're taking to court. It will be very interesting to see how this pans out.

If you're not fond of David Cage as it seems a lot of people here aren't, this lawsuit could even further legitimize the accusations and possibly bring legal ramifications against the studio, which would be much needed if the accusations are true.

On the other hand, if it's found that the articles aren't accurate and that the proper journalistic steps weren't taken, then it helps clear the air around the studio.

I'm sure everyone will wait for due process before jumping to any conclusions, of course.

This is funny to me because it assumes there are only two possibilities.

If QD finds one thing that was slightly misrepresented or not entirely accurate, that doesn't negate everything else.

This is a PR move, plain and simple. For the QD Defense Force to rally around.
 

Maxime

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,986
Slightly off topic, but since many people seem to doubt about the outlets and their coverage, I'll quote myself from an older thread about how the investigation happened:

Canard PC's co-founder Ivan 'Le Fou' Gaudé wrote a small piece regarding the QD investigation. Still behind a paywall, though the main lines are:

- At first, their goal was to draw a global picture of the French video game industry, more specifically working conditions. It wasn't targeting any company, but the name Quantic Dream was too recurring to not have a specific interest about what's going on there.
- They also soon realized that Le Monde was also investigating. So, instead of "walking on each other feet" and turning it into a "race", they joined forces.
- One key date was the 22nd of December of 2017, day where a hearing at the labor relations board (five former QD employees vs. the company) was happening. Also, Canard PC needed to wrap things up before the 5th of January, day they had to send their newspaper to the printer.
- The 26th of December, they (Canard PC, Mediapart & Le Monde) sent their joined questions list to Quantic Dream's board so QD could be aware about the investigation, the data collected but also what the accusations the outlets had towards QD.
- Meeting the 4th of January with QD's board (David Cage & Guillaume de Fondaumière) that Ivan Gaudé qualifies as "tense".
- Following that meeting, several emails form QD qualified as "extremely virulent", accusing the journalists of defamation, insults and harassment above some other things. Few days after, a letter from a law firm threatening them on behalf of QD (at that point, nothing was published yet).
- Mediapart & Canard PC gathered 20 testimonies from former but also current employees (including some that are happy there or left but without hard feelings). IIRC, Le Monde has around 15 testimonies (maybe some in common of course).
- They refused to give names of these employees but they know them all, verified all of them. They just don't want to destroy their careers, given how small the industry in France is.

Also, please Google / Wikipedia "Le Monde" and "Mediapart" before questioning their seriousness.
 

Alderade

Member
Oct 27, 2017
189
It takes a lot of confidence from Quantic Dream to jump into a lawsuit over this - especially give the pedigree of the outlets they're taking to court. It will be very interesting to see how this pans out.

If you're not fond of David Cage as it seems a lot of people here aren't, this lawsuit could even further legitimize the accusations and possibly bring legal ramifications against the studio, which would be much needed if the accusations are true.

On the other hand, if it's found that the articles aren't accurate and that the proper journalistic steps weren't taken, then it helps clear the air around the studio.

I'm sure everyone will wait for due process before jumping to any conclusions, of course.

In France (i'm from Paris) this lawsuit mean nothing. It's happen every day in politics and corporations. It's a PR move for the players or the shareholders.
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459
Maybe this has been said before but surely Tim Langdon from Edge must've at least tried to sue the press. I mean didn't he go after Edge magazine for their name? He wasn't afraid of bad pr.
 

daybreak

Member
Feb 28, 2018
2,415
This is funny to me because it assumes there areare o two possibilities.

If QD finds one thing that was slightly misrepresented or not entirely accurate, that doesn't negate everything else.

This is a PR move, plain and simple. For the QD Defense Force to rally around.

Yeah, I'm referring to the two extremes. You're right and it's probably most likely that literally nothing comes of this - it may even be tied up in legal procedure forever - I'm not familiar with the French judicial system.
 

Carpathia

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,199
I don't see why they would sue the news outlets, and drag out the scrutiny they will receive, if they thought the reporting was based entirely on fact.

This is a good step towards establishing what the actual truth is, in any case.



That's my thinking too, why sue and put the matter in the spotlight again if there is no wrongdoing by the journalists and behind closed doors QD knows the articles are 100% true. We will see what happen, it's a shame some people here can behave when it comes to David Cage, it's like they have something personal against him.
 

mael

Avenger
Nov 3, 2017
16,809
Why isn't QC using "droit de réponse" instead of suing the shit out of media that talk about them?
 

Deleted member 39450

User requested account closure
Banned
Feb 3, 2018
476
Boston, MA
1. Yes. The reporting remains credible, regardless of Cage's hissy fit.

2. David Cage inserted a meaningless 'shower scene' into a game. But even that is not enough for him; he had a nude model constructed to go along with it. As opposed to, you know, not rendering stuff that is not actively used by the game.

Stuff like that points to Cage being a creep, which people have been saying for years.

Character models with realistic skin textures are standard practice for lead characters, even if the character is clothed. The textures are probably derived from another model. I don't think this really constitutes misogyny on anyone's part.
 

Elandyll

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
8,822
Just as a reminder of context, 2 out of 3 official complaints have been dismissed right off the bat by a jury made of employers and employees (Prud'Hommes).

This move (which indeed has a strong Streisand Effect spiraling possibly happening) might indicate they are confident they are going to win the 3rd and last official complaint.
 

enMTW

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
894
Character models with realistic skin textures are standard practice for lead characters, even if the character is clothed. The textures are probably derived from another model. I don't think this really constitutes misogyny on anyone's part.

It is not, in fact, common practice to include nude models of a character - in violation of your agreement with the individual in question - in a shipping video game. It is equally uncommon to include a shower scene in a non-pornographic video game. Both actions hint at a deeper evil.