• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Wereroku

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,247
Slightly off topic, but since many people seem to doubt about the outlets and their coverage, I'll quote myself from an older thread about how the investigation happened:

Also, please Google / Wikipedia "Le Monde" and "Mediapart" before questioning their seriousness.

So QD was only given 11 days to respond to a report that had been in process for months? That doesn't seem like much time for an through investigation and response from QD.
 

Sir Guts

Use of alt account
Member
Oct 26, 2017
10,480
If it wasn't true why there was sensitivity among the workers inside the studio? Fix your shit if it's true instead of sueing someone who pointed out what's definitely wrong.
 

Deleted member 2791

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,054
And in those 74 years it NEVER got anything wrong! I think you keep missing my point. I do tend to believe the story, but I'm baffled by your confidence. It seems like you have a personal vendetta against David Cage or something.

I tend to not like racists & sexists bigots, true. I'd hope that would be the case for everyone though.

Do video game such widely important topic in France? Would any mistake affect their credibility later on? (seriously asking I have no idea)

It's not that much about the video game aspect, if any big company was inaccurately accused of such claims, consequences would definitely be big.
 
Dec 4, 2017
11,481
Brazil
https://kotaku.com/detroit-developer-quantic-dream-sues-french-media-over-1825453518
In an e-mail, Canard PC's Gaudé told me that the sued publications will now have to demonstrate that they handled the story with fairness and "good faith." They will have to show the judge that they reached out to all parties involved, offered those parties' perspectives, and used "the appropriate caution" while reporting this story.
Sounds fair, I wonder if people will read this before start talking about David Cage.
 

Funkallero

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,791
Tokyo
In France (i'm from Paris) this lawsuit mean nothing. It's happen every day in politics and corporations. It's a PR move for the players or the shareholders.

This.
It's also possible that their lawyer has enough elements to sue for defamation.
If let's say half the report is true, the other half can be qualified as slandering and they could possibly win based on lack of evidence.
 

Deleted member 2791

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,054
WHERE ARE THESE PEOPLE? It seems like another thing you just made up.

Note that this is the last time I'm answering you from now on.
5821f7e665.png
 

Deleted member 16657

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
10,198
In France (i'm from Paris) this lawsuit mean nothing. It's happen every day in politics and corporations. It's a PR move for the players or the shareholders.

So this lawsuit cannot hurt QD? Like the court can't rule "actually you're guilty of all of the reported things" and throw QD's stock in the shitter?

From an american perspective it just seems very unwise to sue for something you are actually guilty of
 

Nerokis

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,567
Three independent publications, including two of the biggest and most credible in France, come to similar conclusions about issues with QD's workplace. They even post photographic evidence.

None of the claims being made are even sensational. It all has to do with inappropriate shit being said, long work hours, Cage being hard to work with, and other things along those lines.

All of this, in 90% of cases, is usually grounds for a high degree of confidence in the veracity of reports. Of course, though, that goes nowhere for some of the people here; somehow, they exist in a permanent state of "who knows what's true?" and feel the need to direct their energies toward protecting a video game company from being criticized on the basis of credible reporting.
 

AlexCampy89

Banned
Nov 16, 2017
956
I don't understand QD reaction on this.
If you have 3 media outlets who spoke about a bad working environnement in you company : you fix it !

QD will loose in court but they want to brag about this because they think it's damaging their reputation.

As if journalism isn't plenty of click baiters and liars...

QD is doing the right thing : you blame me without proofs, and then I sue you for libel /defamation.

We should stop with the attitude "the accuser is always right".
 

Alienous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,605
It is not, in fact, common practice to include nude models of a character - in violation of your agreement with the individual in question - in a shipping video game. It is equally uncommon to include a shower scene in a non-pornographic video game. Both actions hint at a deeper evil.

I don't know about it hinting at evil. Shower scenes occur in films, which are a clear inspiration for Quantic Dreams' games. And modeling an accurate model, then building a scene around it, doesn't seem ridiculous to me - having a sense of where sensitive parts should be visible in a shot so you can shoot around them. Leaving the model on the disc probably had more to do with time constraints or absentmindeness than creepiness - I don't see what reward would be worth the risk of doing that.

Mad Jack on the other hand is enough for me to have a low opinion of David Cage.
 

enMTW

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
894
I don't know about it hinting at evil. Shower scenes occur in films, which are a clear inspiration for Quantic Dreams' games. And modeling an accurate model, then building a scene around it, doesn't seem ridiculous to me - having a sense of where sensitive parts should be visible in a shot so you can shoot around them. Leaving the model on the disc probably had more to do with time constraints or absentmindeness than creepiness - I don't see what reward would be worth the risk of doing that.

Mad Jack on the other hand is enough for me to have a low opinion of David Cage.

Once upon a time, in a darker era, shower scenes were considered legitimate. They are rare now, and typically serve a point. Cage's did not.
 

Deleted member 2791

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,054
So this lawsuit cannot hurt QD? Like the court can't rule "actually you're guilty of all of the reported things" and throw QD's stock in the shitter?

From an american perspective it just seems very unwise to sue for something you are actually guilty of

Think of it that way : by suing them, they're both managing to bring them positive press with the classic contre-feux tactic, and are able to push back the trial up until after Detroit has been released, and avoid any potential damage to its release next month.
 

LordBaztion

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,812
Lima Perú
Suing a reputable newspaper over defamation, that's not wise.

If there is something they need to address, they should have contacted the authors and explain their side of the story. That's how you get a complementary or rectification piece
 
Oct 27, 2017
351
If the reports were from these news outlets were inaccurate I'm glad QD is fighting them. Regardless of how you feel about QD and David Cage I think we can all agree we should all trust the due process
 

Deleted member 39450

User requested account closure
Banned
Feb 3, 2018
476
Boston, MA
It is not, in fact, common practice to include nude models of a character - in violation of your agreement with the individual in question - in a shipping video game. It is equally uncommon to include a shower scene in a non-pornographic video game. Both actions hint at a deeper evil.

It's not, but could easily have been a mistake.

And again, it's a bit of a reach to draw a line to misogyny on the developer's part. Their games have long contained sexual themes and nudity with male and female characters.
 

Hellshy

Member
Nov 5, 2017
1,172
I don't understand QD reaction on this.
If you have 3 media outlets who spoke about a bad working environnement in you company : you fix it !

QD will loose in court but they want to brag about this because they think it's damaging their reputation.

All this will is draw more attention to it. Maybe it was bad reporting? This is not what one does to brag . They either have a case or being dumb
 

JahIthBer

Member
Jan 27, 2018
10,382
So when is Cage gonna yell Fake News on Twitter before announcing hes working on Kingdom Come 2?
He really should just apologise & admit he screwed up, i want to play Detroit, but Cage is making it a bit hard.
 

Alderade

Member
Oct 27, 2017
189
So this lawsuit cannot hurt QD? Like the court can't rule "actually you're guilty of all of the reported things" and throw QD's stock in the shitter?

From an american perspective it just seems very unwise to sue for something you are actually guilty of

At worst for QD I think they will have to pay a fee for the lawyers and the judge time. It's a move to silent the press or for the shareholders.

As if journalism isn't plenty of click baiters and liars...

QD is doing the right thing : you blame me without proofs, and then I sue you for libel /defamation.

We should stop with the attitude "the accuser is always right".

Without proofs ? Have you read the articles from this 3 "click baiters and liars" ?
 

Yep

Member
Dec 14, 2017
531
So this lawsuit cannot hurt QD? Like the court can't rule "actually you're guilty of all of the reported things" and throw QD's stock in the shitter?

From an american perspective it just seems very unwise to sue for something you are actually guilty of
In France if the court decide QD to be wrong, they will just have to pay for the lawyer cost of the opponents, nothing more.
There could be a problem if the opponent counter-attack, but being big newspapers i doubt they will do that.
 

thepenguin55

Member
Oct 28, 2017
11,815
Get bent David Cage.

Please, don't buy Detroit.

So I'm still planning to buy this game but not on day one. In fact, I'm thinking I might buy it used so that QD doesn't get a dime from me and I get to satiate my morbid curiosity about this game in a mostly guilt-free manner. I say "mostly" because the good people that do work there deserve to be paid for their work but it's just hard to justify buying a new copy knowing the kind of company my money is going to.
 
Dec 4, 2017
11,481
Brazil
I don't understand QD reaction on this.
If you have 3 media outlets who spoke about a bad working environnement in you company : you fix it !

QD will loose in court but they want to brag about this because they think it's damaging their reputation.
Just as a reminder of context, 2 out of 3 official complaints have been dismissed right off the bat by a jury made of employers and employees (Prud'Hommes).

This move (which indeed has a strong Streisand Effect spiraling possibly happening) might indicate they are confident they are going to win the 3rd and last official complaint.
QD hate is real and palpable
 

Deleted member 16657

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
10,198
In France if the court decide QD to be wrong, they will just have to pay for the lawyer cost of the opponents, nothing more.
There could be a problem if the opponent counter-attack, but being big newspapers i doubt they will do that.
At worst for QD I think they will have to pay a fee for the lawyers and the judge time. It's a move to silent the press or for the shareholders.
Think of it that way : by suing them, they're both managing to bring them positive press with the classic contre-feux tactic, and are able to push back the trial up until after Detroit has been released, and avoid any potential damage to its release next month.

I see, Thank you for that sorely needed additional context. Looks like some shady maneuvering from QD.
 

mael

Avenger
Nov 3, 2017
16,812
We literally had photographic evidence of the shit the media shared and people go about believing David fucking Cage because MUH VIDYAGUMS.
I'll never be surprised by the new lows the gaming community will lower itself to support companies that give them their fix.
 

Palette Swap

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
11,212
That's as petty as it will be ineffective, in that I have zero doubt these publications have done their due diligence and will prove it.

Cage really is a complete moron.
 
Dec 4, 2017
11,481
Brazil
Yes, people generally hate companies with toxic work environments.

I'm glad we've established that.

Hard to blame them for disliking a company that is violating their workers human rights.

In an e-mail, Canard PC's Gaudé told me that the sued publications will now have to demonstrate that they handled the story with fairness and "good faith." They will have to show the judge that they reached out to all parties involved, offered those parties' perspectives, and used "the appropriate caution" while reporting this story.
 

Wereroku

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,247
Suing a reputable newspaper over defamation, that's not wise.

If there is something they need to address, they should have contacted the authors and explain their side of the story. That's how you get a complementary or rectification piece
I mean going by the info posted earlier in the thread they were only given 11 days to respond to everything before it went to print. Not much they could have done to research and give a long response. Not sure why the papers didn't give them more time to investigate.
 

Deleted member 2791

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,054
In an e-mail, Canard PC's Gaudé told me that the sued publications will now have to demonstrate that they handled the story with fairness and "good faith." They will have to show the judge that they reached out to all parties involved, offered those parties' perspectives, and used "the appropriate caution" while reporting this story.

And ? I'm not sure you understand these words.

I mean going by the info posted earlier in the thread they were only given 11 days to respond to everything before it went to print. Not much they could have done to research and give a long response. Not sure why the papers didn't give them more time to investigate.

I'm getting the impression that you think this suing is their response, which isn't the case at all, their response was that they're denying everything but they brought the case to justice only later, after the story was public.
 
Oct 27, 2017
645
In tech it's a big problem if you are known as a terrible/stressful company to work for. It's an obstacle to obtaining top talent. If you're top talent you have alot of options, why work for a company that's known to stress employees out? You don't need that shit when you're in demand.

If the allegations aren't true, I can see why they would sue. It's really bad for their public image to be known as a shitty place to work for.
 

BernardoOne

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,289
In an e-mail, Canard PC's Gaudé told me that the sued publications will now have to demonstrate that they handled the story with fairness and "good faith." They will have to show the judge that they reached out to all parties involved, offered those parties' perspectives, and used "the appropriate caution" while reporting this story.
I'm not sure what you copy pasting that is supposed to achieve. Canard PC aired the exact same things and isn't being sued.
 

Alderade

Member
Oct 27, 2017
189
In an e-mail, Canard PC's Gaudé told me that the sued publications will now have to demonstrate that they handled the story with fairness and "good faith." They will have to show the judge that they reached out to all parties involved, offered those parties' perspectives, and used "the appropriate caution" while reporting this story.
Sue the press in France will lead to nothing. It's a tactical move from QD to : 1/ Silent the press during the marketing push for Detroit 2/Reassure Sony and/or the company shareholders

But we still wait for a declaration to make the company a better place to work.
 

Alienous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,605
In France (i'm from Paris) this lawsuit mean nothing. It's happen every day in politics and corporations. It's a PR move for the players or the shareholders.

I can see why in those cases - it makes sense in the short term (getting votes, maintaining shares) and doesn't matter as much down the line.

With this I can't imagine it having a big impact on the copies or Detroit that are sold, but I can see it having an impact a year from now if the allegations are proven true, investigations potentially unearth more, and Sony have to decide of continuing to work with Quantico Dream is good for their PR.

Once upon a time, in a darker era, shower scenes were considered legitimate. They are rare now, and typically serve a point. Cage's did not.

I checked the scenes and in Beyond it seems like they are used as a conceit to have Aiden communicate with Jodie directly, via a steamed mirror. And I'm sure there was an intent to titilate - an intent that I'm sure Ellen Page was aware of when those scenes were recorded - but I don't think that has anything to do with evil.
 
Oct 25, 2017
13,246
In an e-mail, Canard PC's Gaudé told me that the sued publications will now have to demonstrate that they handled the story with fairness and "good faith." They will have to show the judge that they reached out to all parties involved, offered those parties' perspectives, and used "the appropriate caution" while reporting this story.

Yes...

No one has ever done a useless lawsuit to serve as positive PR.

That's never happened. Ever.