• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Deleted member 8752

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
10,122
I'm not a fan of Star Trek (honestly, I just haven't watched any of it yet), but if Tarantino makes it, that could change.
 

Deleted member 3208

Oct 25, 2017
11,934
Eh... I just don't see this working.

For now, Shield Up, Red Alert.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,620
Or his James Bond reboot. This shit comes up all the time and nothing comes of it.
The difference is that he had an idea for Casino Royale and Eon said no. Here you have JJ and Paramount actively developing his idea for Star Trek.

Not saying he's going to actually direct the thing, but this is much more legit than him pitching ideas for James Bond into the void.
 

Mengy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,405
Tarantino has talked about his idea for a Star Trek film for a long time. Based on one of the episodes from TNG but spruced up into feature length



That's awesome, I love how he mentions Yesterday's Enterprise. My brother and I always thought that Star Trek VII, the film where Kirk and Picard meet, would have been better if it adapted a story similar to Yesterday's Enterprise, where the two ships and crews could meet, but in the end Kirk's Enterprise goes out in a blaze of glory as it sacrifices itself for a greater good with Kirk dying on the bridge of his ship.


I think Tarantino could actually write a good Star Trek movie, he certainly has a great affection and understanding of the franchise.
 

Thatguy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
6,207
Seattle WA
200.gif
 

Taki

Attempt to circumvent a ban with an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,308
This sounds like a clever way to bring some TNG cast back
 

Einchy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
42,659
Tarantino has talked about his idea for a Star Trek film for a long time. Based on one of the episodes from TNG but spruced up into feature length


Yeah, this story was less surprising that he would do a Star Trek movie but more that others would let him. As a Tarantino fanboy, I'm not sure I want this, though. Especially since if he directs this, it would be tenth and final film. He could always go back on that but he has been pretty adamant over the years that it's ten and then done.
 

Proteus

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,984
Toronto
Yeah, this story was less surprising that he would do a Star Trek movie but more that others would let him. As a Tarantino fanboy, I'm not sure I want this, though. Especially since if he directs this, it would be tenth and final film. He could always go back on that but he has been pretty adamant over the years that it's ten and then done.
I still want a 70s cop drama based on Freebie and the Bean or something like Vice Squad out of him.
 

Nategc20

Banned
Nov 21, 2017
31
So dumb. Literally one of those "throw it at the wall and see if it sticks because this dude is famous" type situations. Guarantee you that a Trekkie in bumfuck, New Jersey already has a better script written then what ever any of these hacks come up with. Seriously.
 

BigJeffery

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
2,338
So dumb. Literally one of those "throw it at the wall and see if it sticks because this dude is famous" type situations. Guarantee you that a Trekkie in bumfuck, New Jersey already has a better script written then what ever any of these hacks come up with. Seriously.

lmao why do you think Tarantino is a hack?
 

Soap

Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,188
Tarantino would be a great person to kick off a Kelvin verse dialogue heavy TNG.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,486
Tarantino was right that the reboot into new universe concept was terrible from the get go. I didn't really want a retcon of TOS. Yesterday's Enterprise is a good example of how you could have done it without needing to do the dumb alternate timeline shit. That said I don't know that I think he'd make a particularly good Star Trek movie, but like all Star Trek movies I'd watch it.
 

hibikase

User requested ban
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,820
JJ Star Trek is already a fucking mess, so at this point why the hell not
 

Vommy

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,928
Trek with Tarantino sounds like a really fun time. Can't wait for more details.
 

Daitokuji

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,602
I hope he makes a Star Trek movie that is 2 hours and 40 minutes of dialogue and 20 minutes of action.
 

HeySeuss

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
8,858
Ohio
This seems like a train wreck but I'll watch. Not sure an ultra graphically violent Star trek is something I'd like tho
 

whytemyke

The Fallen
Oct 28, 2017
3,786
I think it was a Nerdist podcast he was on where he was detailing everything he'd do if he were to make a Star Trek movie. I don't remember the details but I know that he was just all in on how passionate he was about the idea.

People forget this but Tarantino is a massive nerd before anything else, haha.
 

Jarmel

The Jackrabbit Always Wins
Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,338
New York
This is what trips me up about it too. He really values the look of his legacy, because that's how he looks at other directors' filmographies. Even if Paramount gives him carte blanche to do whatever he wants, I just can't imagine him thinking that Star Trek is the natural end point for his directing career. From Reservoir Dogs to Kill Bill...to Star Trek?

On the other hand, it would sort of mimic the career trajectory of low-budget indies to hyper-violent exploitation to franchise tentpoles that some of his idols have taken, heh.
He isn't stopping at 10.
 

GDGF

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,326
I'd watch but it wont feel like a Tarantino movie without the blood and cussing. The exposition is going to be great though.
 
Oct 25, 2017
14,651
Maybe the Yesterday's Enterprise angle involves George Kirk.
Of course there have been rumors of George Kirk's return for a while now, which I assume is why you bring him up. I don't think it would be for a simple flashback, so it'd probably be something like that.

Makes me wonder if they might have wanted to close out the series by preventing Nero's incursion in the first place, butterfly effect style. That might piss people off, though. It would effectively erase the current crew from time and people don't like to see that happen to characters they enjoy. Right now the Kelvin timeline exists alongside the Prime timeline, they coexist. In that sense there's nothing that needs restoring. If they do that, it might be perceived as a net loss by fans.
I think it's nicer to the cast and fans to just send them off into the sunset with an imagined long future ahead of them in their splinter universe.

I can't deny how fascinating it would be however to see the final movie end like Yesterday's Enterprise, with George Kirk standing peacefully on the bridge of the Kelvin on their way back to Earth for his and his wife's shore leave in Iowa. Maybe after the adult James Kirk makes his own Kelvin-esque sacrifice to stop the Narada from ever escaping the black hole due to some unforeseen greater consequences than they've previously discovered. Growing up loathsome of his father's shadow and eventually learning to be the same kind of self sacrificing man as him.

It'd be a neat brain teaser of a character arc with a lot of emotions. But they'd be erasing everyone to accomplish it and I don't know how well people would react to that.
 
Last edited:

jp319

Member
Oct 27, 2017
574
I can't deny how fascinating it would be however to see the final movie end like Yesterday's Enterprise, with George Kirk standing peacefully on the bridge of the Kelvin on their way back to Earth for his and his wife's shore leave in Iowa. Maybe after the adult James Kirk makes his own Kelvin-esque sacrifice to stop the Narada from ever escaping the black hole due to some unforeseen greater consequences than they've previously discovered. Growing up loathsome of his father's shadow and eventually learning to be the same kind of self sacrificing man as him.

It'd be a neat brain teaser of a character arc with a lot of emotions. But they'd be erasing everyone to accomplish it and I don't know how well people would react to that.
Would probably need to be George making the sacrifice all over again after Jim gets to know him and they have a chance to spend some time together. Like you said having to prevent some unforeseen consequence, but George saving his son again. Then maybe an older George emerges Frequency-style. Who knows.
 

zooj

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
858
Ames, IA
Of course there have been rumors of George Kirk's return for a while now, which I assume is why you bring him up. I don't think it would be for a simple flashback, so it'd probably be something like that.

Makes me wonder if they might have wanted to close out the series by preventing Nero's incursion in the first place, butterfly effect style. That might piss people off, though. It would effectively erase the current crew from time and people don't like to see that happen to characters they enjoy. Right now the Kelvin timeline exists alongside the Prime timeline, they coexist. In that sense there's nothing that needs restoring. If they do that, it might be perceived as a net loss by fans.
I think it's nicer to the cast and fans to just send them off into the sunset with an imagined long future ahead of them in their splinter universe.

I can't deny how fascinating it would be however to see the final movie end like Yesterday's Enterprise, with George Kirk standing peacefully on the bridge of the Kelvin on their way back to Earth for his and his wife's shore leave in Iowa. Maybe after the adult James Kirk makes his own Kelvin-esque sacrifice to stop the Narada from ever escaping the black hole due to some unforeseen greater consequences than they've previously discovered. Growing up loathsome of his father's shadow and eventually learning to be the same kind of self sacrificing man as him.

It'd be a neat brain teaser of a character arc with a lot of emotions. But they'd be erasing everyone to accomplish it and I don't know how well people would react to that.
It wasn't a rumor, it was officially announced by Paramount before Beyond came out.
http://variety.com/2016/film/news/p...trek-chris-pine-chris-hemsworth-1201816258/#!
Since then, I'm sure those plans have been scrapped since Beyond didn't do all that great against the other movies.
 

BitByDeath

User banned at own request
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
791

I just rewatched and it has to easily be his worst.

Nothing even happens for the first 3/4 until the bag switch at the clothes store takes place, have you watched it recently?

There is next to nothing memorable before then aside from the guy at the beginning getting shot in the boot of the car.

You should watch his better movies like Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Django Unchained, even From Dusk til Dawn shits on it from great heights.
 

Digoman

Member
Oct 27, 2017
233
So... apparently this is going forward fast:
http://deadline.com/2017/12/quentin...rew-pearce-lindsay-beer-jj-abrams-1202222161/
Deadline said:
After Deadline this week revealed that Quentin Tarantino pitched a Star Trek film to JJ Abrams and Paramount, the whole thing is moving at warp speed. Tarantino met for hours in a writers room with Mark L. Smith, Lindsey Beer, and Drew Pearce. They kicked around ideas and one of them will get the job. I'm hearing the frontrunner is Smith, who wrote The Revenant. The film will most certainly go where no Star Trek has gone before: Tarantino has required it to be R rated, and Paramount and Abrams agreed to that condition.

Must have been one hell of a pitch. Now I'm really curious where this is all going.