• Light/Dark
  • Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Question: How many games on Switch have been released on 32GB cards?

Deleted member 5334

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,815
Ignoring games that obviously would've been on 32GB cards and force you to download a mandatory update, how many games have actually been released on actual 32GB game cards?

So far, as far as I am aware, the only one I've heard about is Dragon Quest Heroes I + II's port, which I've heard almost completely fills the card. But outside of that game, I haven't heard of any others. I know I heard some western developers discuss that the US branch hasn't made the cards available to them, so not sure what's going on there.

Either way, anyone heard of any other games using 32GB game cards? Japanese or not, curious.
 
Skittzo

Skittzo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
41,037
One that we know of so far.

We even had a rumor that at one point Nintendo stopped offering 32GB cards to some publishers.
 
Diarrhea Day-Lewis

Diarrhea Day-Lewis

Member
Oct 27, 2017
20,745
One, probably since costs are so high. Devs already don't want to pay for the 16GB (reason for Switch tax) so I imagine 32GB is like $10 per copy. Makes Reggie's statement about RDR2 not on switch invalid because if it ran on switch the user would still need to DL 70GB+ even with a 32GB cart AND rockstar would be losing $10 vs a sale of the same game on PS4/Xbox

Anecdotal but I believe Apple pays 25 cents per GB in 2018 for flash memory, which I think differs but may have similar costs. Idk what Nintendo pays but it ain't cheap.

Going by the rough Apple rate of 25 cents per GB it would be 32GB=$8, 16GB =$4, 8GB =$2. All vs a Blu-ray Disc that costs less than $1
 

Django.Mango

Member
Jan 31, 2018
802
Its too expensive to distribute and a waste of plastics. Id only bring them limited editioned retailed.
 
808s & Villainy

808s & Villainy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
42,700
bonesawisready5 said:
Anecdotal but I believe Apple pays 25 cents per GB in 2018 for flash memory, which I think differs but may have similar costs. Idk what Nintendo pays but it ain't cheap.

Going by the rough Apple rate of 25 cents per GB it would be 32GB=$8, 16GB =$4, 8GB =$2. All vs a Blu-ray Disc that costs less than $1
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I don't think you can do direct comparisons like that. For one, Nintendo's cards are read online memory so I assume they don't cost the same as those that allow read/write
 
justiceiro

justiceiro

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
6,664
Lyrick

Lyrick

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,818
bonesawisready5 said:
One, probably since costs are so high. Devs already don't want to pay for the 16GB (reason for Switch tax) so I imagine 32GB is like $10 per copy. Makes Reggie's statement about RDR2 not on switch invalid because if it ran on switch the user would still need to DL 70GB+ even with a 32GB cart AND rockstar would be losing $10 vs a sale of the same game on PS4/Xbox

Anecdotal but I believe Apple pays 25 cents per GB in 2018 for flash memory, which I think differs but may have similar costs. Idk what Nintendo pays but it ain't cheap.

Going by the rough Apple rate of 25 cents per GB it would be 32GB=$8, 16GB =$4, 8GB =$2. All vs a Blu-ray Disc that costs less than $1
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

currently declining to $0.20/GB
https://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1333738 said:
Handy said that the goal would challenge the Taiwan company's business model that, to date, has focused more on high-mix, low-volume products. Success will also depend on the state of NAND ASPs, which have been declining from 27 cents/GByte to 20 cents/GB, noted Handy.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
 
Diarrhea Day-Lewis

Diarrhea Day-Lewis

Member
Oct 27, 2017
20,745
justiceiro said:
Da hell? So the developer that make the bigger games don't have access to bigger carts, this fits Nintendo so much...

Which statement?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

He said they'd love to have it but that since the games development started before switch it wasn't possible. Which is a factor, sure but beyond the hardware requirements to make a port (they tested LA Noire last year so maybe it didn't do as well as they hoped or idk) they would need to find a solution to fitting a 100GB game on switch cart
 
Diarrhea Day-Lewis

Diarrhea Day-Lewis

Member
Oct 27, 2017
20,745
808s & Villainy said:
I don't think you can do direct comparisons like that. For one, Nintendo's cards are read online memory so I assume they don't cost the same as those that allow read/write
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Oh yeah for sure that's why I mentioned it not being the same and being anecdotal.

But seeing as devs are adding $10 to 16GB games, it does seem like 16GB costs close to $5ish per cart
 
Liam Allen-Miller

Liam Allen-Miller

Member
Nov 2, 2017
6,790
Shibuya
bonesawisready5 said:
Thanks for the info!

So if it's 20 cents then 32GB=$6.4, 16GB=$3.2, 8GB=$1.6

More or less.

So it's getting more affordable but 32 isn't quite at the price of a 16 cart yet. Maybe in 2020
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Having seen the prices of Switch carts, those numbers are dramatically lower than reality. Switch carts still have a bespoke production process after materials are acquired so standard numbers for what the raw supplies cost Nintendo are really not very indicative of what the publisher pays (the proportions are kind of similar, though). The 32GB card cost is outrageous and it's not shocking to me that Square charged ¥8800 for DQH 1+2.
 
Diarrhea Day-Lewis

Diarrhea Day-Lewis

Member
Oct 27, 2017
20,745
Liam Allen-Miller said:
Having seen the prices of Switch carts, those numbers are dramatically lower than reality. Switch carts still have a bespoke production process after materials are acquired so standard numbers for what the raw supplies cost Nintendo are really not very indicative of what the publisher pays (the proportions are kind of similar, though). The 32GB card cost is outrageous and it's not shocking to me that Square charged ¥8800 for DQH 1+2.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Ah. I figured. Nintendo probably needs a profit on them too. Doesn't seem like 32 will become viable anytime soon for third parties then.
 
Liam Allen-Miller

Liam Allen-Miller

Member
Nov 2, 2017
6,790
Shibuya
bonesawisready5 said:
Ah. I figured. Nintendo probably needs a profit on them too. Doesn't seem like 32 will become viable anytime soon for third parties then.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
It's honestly a real shame. I wish more games could use the 16GB and 32GB carts, but it's just... wild.

EDIT: It's honestly a really tricky situation for Nintendo as well. If they subsidize the carts too hard they'd end up cutting themselves out of making any real money from retail units, so I think the only viable solution is to persevere and keep working on ways to bring cart costs down. For the time being, publishers and consumers unfortunately just have to deal with being called cheap/having to download a certain amount of content. :(
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

Deleted member 5334

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,815
Liam Allen-Miller said:
Having seen the prices of Switch carts, those numbers are dramatically lower than reality. Switch carts still have a bespoke production process after materials are acquired so standard numbers for what the raw supplies cost Nintendo are really not very indicative of what the publisher pays (the proportions are kind of similar, though). The 32GB card cost is outrageous and it's not shocking to me that Square charged ¥8800 for DQH 1+2.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Really interesting to hear that.

Question: There's been a couple developers that have chosen to go with 8GB versus 16GB, and those have a mandatory download. Is the cost difference between the two worth the amount they'd save by instead using a 8GB card size with a mandatory download? If you can't answer (either fully or not), that's okay. Just curious.

EDIT: Corrected a mistake.
 
Evergarden

Evergarden

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,408
ZhugeEX said:
This isn't how it works.

Nintendo charge a combined fee for the cart, the packaging and distribution on the Switch platform.

32GB carts are more than 3x the cost you posted above.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

What, nearly $20 for a 32 GB cart ? No wonder why they don't use it. They definitely make something to reduce its price.
 
Liam Allen-Miller

Liam Allen-Miller

Member
Nov 2, 2017
6,790
Shibuya
Mendinso said:
Really interesting to hear that.

Question: There's been a couple developers that have chosen to go with 8GB versus 16GB, and those have a mandatory download. Is the cost difference between the two worth the amount they'd save by instead using a 8GB card size with a mandatory download? If you can't answer (either fully or not), that's okay. Just curious.

EDIT: Corrected a mistake.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
The costs of the 16GB and 32GB are where the numbers get scary, basically. I'd say it's unfortunately warranted. 4GB is already a bit more than 3DS and Vita 4GBs afaik. It's basically the exact same situation as Vita memory cards (minus the consumer-side costs on the Vita cards lol); it's real darn expensive to make proprietary flash memory, and until you're making it in huge quantities it doesn't really get cheap.
 
Evergarden

Evergarden

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,408
ZhugeEX said:
I did say more than 3x. So your assumption it's exactly 3x as much would be incorrect here.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
giphy.gif
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 5334

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,815
Liam Allen-Miller said:
The costs of the 16GB and 32GB are where the numbers get scary, basically. I'd say it's unfortunately warranted. 4GB is already a bit more than 3DS and Vita 4GBs afaik.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Gotcha, that makes sense then.

What's kinda interesting though is I know at one point, Sony had intended to make larger cartridge sizes available for the Vita, but I know that ultimately didn't end up happening. I assume due to sales overall and costs at the time, which speaking of which...

It's basically the exact same situation as Vita memory cards (minus the consumer-side costs on the Vita cards lol); it's real darn expensive to make proprietary flash memory, and until you're making it in huge quantities it doesn't really get cheap.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Yeah. I always assumed that was the reason why the costs were so much higher there. I realize it was meant to curve piracy (since I know this was a huge problem for the PSP in the west), but at the same time, really made a lot of people I''ve either talked with or seen responses for, hesitate to buy a Vita. Shame, as there was a lot of good games that came out for it, and it was clear Western third parties wanted to give it a chance.

Anyways, thank you so much for your responses.
 
Liam Allen-Miller

Liam Allen-Miller

Member
Nov 2, 2017
6,790
Shibuya
Mendinso said:
Gotcha, that makes sense then.

What's kinda interesting though is I know at one point, Sony had intended to make larger cartridge sizes available for the Vita, but I know that ultimately didn't end up happening. I assume due to sales overall and costs at the time, which speaking of which...



Yeah. I always assumed that was the reason why the costs were so much higher there. I realize it was meant to curve piracy (since I know this was a huge problem for the PSP in the west), but at the same time, really made a lot of people I''ve either talked with or seen responses for, hesitate to buy a Vita. Shame, as there was a lot of good games that came out for it, and it was clear Western third parties wanted to give it a chance.

Anyways, thank you so much for your responses.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
No prob, dude.

Also since I have nobody to talk to about this I will just complain into the ether that it's a shame the 32GB Vita cards did eventually hit ¥6500 MSRP but it was years to late to undo the damage.
 
Instro

Instro

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,996
ZhugeEX said:
This isn't how it works.

Nintendo charge a combined fee for the cart, the packaging and distribution on the Switch platform.

32GB carts are more than 3x the cost you posted above.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Oof. That's like N64 level cartridge costs. Explains some of the comments and rumors stating that this is an issue holding back 3rd party support.
 
justiceiro

justiceiro

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
6,664
Makes me wonder: who the hell where "disappointed" when Nintendo delayed the production of 64GB cart to next year? Like, dude, you are not even using the 32gb for being too expensive, how are you planning to pay for the 64gb ones?
 
Falcato

Falcato

Member
Nov 2, 2017
239
justiceiro said:
Makes me wonder: who the hell where "disappointed" when Nintendo delayed the production of 64GB cart to next year? Like, dude, you are not even using the 32gb for being too expensive, how are you planning to pay for the 64gb ones?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

It's because the price of the cards is tiered.
The introduction of the 64gb cards means the other cards' price goes down.

For example (numbers are invented by me):
Prices now:
  • 32gb = $20+
  • 16gb = $12
  • 8gb = $7
  • 4gb = $4
Prices when 64gb cards launch:
  • 64gb = $20+
  • 32gb = $12
  • 16gb = $7
  • 8gb = $4
  • 4gb = $2
Basically, it's the old joke "I can't wait for the iPhone 7 to come out so the 6 goes down in price so I can afford the 5".
 
justiceiro

justiceiro

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
6,664
Falcato said:
It's because the price of the cards is tiered.
The introduction of the 64gb cards means the other cards' price goes down.

For example (numbers are invented by me):
Prices now:
  • 32gb = $20+
  • 16gb = $12
  • 8gb = $7
  • 4gb = $4
Prices when 64gb cards launch:
  • 64gb = $20+
  • 32gb = $12
  • 16gb = $7
  • 8gb = $4
  • 4gb = $2
Basically, it's the old joke "I can't wait for the iPhone 7 to come out so the 6 goes down in price so I can afford the 5".
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Lets just hope nintendo don't delay the carts yet again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.