Oh wow, didn't think they would do this. Good thing they did, a pleasant surprise.
The original version is still out there in the wild if people really want to dig it up. I don't think it's a huge loss to anyone, especially when weighted against the harm that leaving it in would cause.Yeah? I don't really like this type of censorship.
I'd rather they put a message up at the start.
That's only because it's a near perfect recreation of the original version. If they felt like mixing the game up a bit in other ways then by all means cut that offensive shit.
The original version is still out there in the wild if people really want to dig it up. I don't think it's a huge loss to anyone, especially when weighted against the harm that leaving it in would cause.
Perfectly recreating transphobia for "artistic integrity" isn't it chief.Yeah? I don't really like this type of censorship.
I'd rather they put a message up at the start.
That's only because it's a near perfect recreation of the original version. If they felt like mixing the game up a bit in other ways then by all means cut that offensive shit.
Edit: I should point out I'm in no attached to the transphobic cut content, I'm just commenting on how censorship is handled. I played through the remaster recently and didn't notice any difference.
You *want* the usual idiots to be called to action over this stuff, seriously?Yea, that's true. How about a comment that it was removed then?
Perfectly recreating transphobia for "artistic integrity" isn't it chief.
Glad they sorted this stuff.
You *want* the usual idiots to be called to action over this stuff, seriously?
No. Just get rid of this sort of stuff and leave it where it belongs.
Nerfs and buffs balancing: I sleepPeople only seem to care about 'artistic integrity' when it involves removing shitty caricatures of marginalized people, not when GTA online adds or changes a hundred other things.
It sure would have been great if they removed the anti lgbtq+ content in the trilogy remake though. The fact they actually kept them in and even remade some of them...
Going to be real I'm not sure how much they get when they put centring trans people on our genitals as the sole commentary on us in the game as being the acceptable amount to leave in — enough to get people clapping for them in fact. It irritates me that I feel like I have to be gracious in accepting a small amount of transphobia in a product at a time where our rights are actively being removed and lives made more dangerous. Especially when that hatred and surrounding commentary is needlepoint focused on our genitalia. Perpetuating this reduction of us isn't something that should be looked past just because it's not someone showing us in a dress with a beard or shouting tranny at us.
The bar is pretty low when someone not not releasing transphobic elements in 2022 but releasing something with 50% less transphobia in it is what warrants praise.
Even soI think GTAV was handled internally by Rockstar while the remakes were outsourced.
But at the same time they didn't have to remove them, it wouldn't have affected their sales and they didn't even make it a marketing bullet point, they just did the right thing and in this climate that's worth celebrating in my opinion.I'm not about to congratulate them for removing something that should have never been in there in the first place, after an entire decade of regular updates.
Thought this person made a good point\similar point about changing the focus of the humour
I get that too, and your not wrong. I just didn't expect any changes at all in the current climate.Going to be real I'm not sure how much they get when they think centring trans people on our genitals as the sole commentary on us in the game is the acceptable state — enough to get people clapping for them. It irritates me that I feel like I have to be gracious in accepting a small amount of transphobia in a product at a time where our rights are actively being removed and lives made more dangerous. Especially when that hatred and surrounding commentary is needlepoint focused on our genitalia. Perpetuating this reduction of us isn't something I feel compelled to looked past just because it's not someone showing us in a dress with a beard or shouting tranny at us.
The bar is pretty low when someone not not releasing transphobic elements in 2022 but releasing something with 50% less transphobia in it is what warrants praise.
Neither did I. At least transphobes won't be getting their kicks from shooting people they see as us in the game.I get that too, and your not wrong. I just didn't expect any changes at all in the current climate.
Yeah, i'm not sure that making some bare minimum changes (and not even covering all of that type of content, as pointed out here already) nearly a decade into the post-launch support of a game is worthy of active praise and celebration. It is 'neat' that they had enough awareness to think this content wasn't worth rereleasing again; I didn't expect it at all; but there is still room for criticism.I'm not about to congratulate them for removing something that should have never been in there in the first place, after an entire decade of regular updates.
Oh, well scratch out that part then lol.Especially since what hasn't been pointed out here or in that Twitter thread is that NPCs in GTA Online can still say "you look like a [t-slur]!" to your player character if you wear certain clothing.
Perpetuating this reduction of us isn't something I feel compelled to look past just because it's not someone showing us in a dress with a beardor shouting tranny at us.
Yeh. Moving past 'some trans women have a penis' to comment on a broader spectrum of our experience would be a big step. Like the focus on genitalia at the expense of all other aspects of our lives is the prime driving force behind the movements of the EHRC in trying to remove us from basic utilities in life, from public toilets to hospital wards. Go look at how trans women are plagued with constant enquiries about whether they've had surgery in circumstances that have nothing to do with it.
You have trans comedians out there cracking jokes about their experiences in ways that don't stoke this primitive view. Hire them. Inject humour in a way that gives people more understanding rather than reinforcing what's already mocked for a cheap laugh.
Sure it's just a sign on the side of a van, but if all you've got to say about trans people in the entirety of your game is to boil trans women down to having a penis then perhaps consider whether it's better off not saying anything at all. That would be understanding the climate.
This is not censorship. This discussion has happened so many times. This is in no way whatsoever related to any form of censorship. Stop misusing the word censorship for shit like this.Yeah? I don't really like this type of censorship.
I'd rather they put a message up at the start.
That's only because it's a near perfect recreation of the original version. If they felt like mixing the game up a bit in other ways then by all means cut that offensive shit.
Edit: I should point out I'm in no attached to the transphobic cut content, I'm just commenting on how censorship is handled. I played through the remaster recently and didn't notice any difference.
This is not censorship. This discussion has happened so many times. This is in no way whatsoever related to any form of censorship. Stop misusing the word censorship for shit like this.
Yeah, here's hoping that is the case. Though I never get my hopes up with Rockstar tbh :/
This is going to trigger a lot of folks, oof.
Good on R* tho, better late than never.
This is not censorship. This discussion has happened so many times. This is in no way whatsoever related to any form of censorship. Stop misusing the word censorship for shit like this.
Disagree completely.. this is clearly a form of censorship and you are also trying to censor another person's POV and think you can decide what the word censorship can and can't be used for.. frankly quite disgusting..
If you remove something that was previously available to everyone (no matter how foul, disgusting or wrong that thing is) that is censorship in it's purest form! Especially when they've done it without informing anyone that they did it!
Oh please stop.Disagree completely.. this is clearly a form of censorship and you are also trying to censor another person's POV and think you can decide what the word censorship can and can't be used for.. frankly quite disgusting..
If you remove something that was previously available to everyone (no matter how foul, disgusting or wrong that thing is) that is censorship in it's purest form! Especially when they've done it without informing anyone that they did it!
No please continue.
It's not censorship, and it's certainly not 'censorship in its purest form' when it's just a piece of shitty content in a massive game that hundreds of staff worked on. If some items get rebalanced, the original developer of them hasn't been 'censored'. If a later edit of a film leaves a scene out, it hasn't been censored. If either of those two elements get left on the cutting room floor even before release, or in any later version, the director isn't censoring the 'views' of those that worked on it either. I don't get why the only changes people start to claim are 'censorship' are when really shitty stuff gets canned, when they don't go to bat for balance patches or lighting or whatever in the same way. An explanation of why your argument is wrong (like this one) isn't censorship either.Disagree completely.. this is clearly a form of censorship and you are also trying to censor another person's POV and think you can decide what the word censorship can and can't be used for.. frankly quite disgusting..
If you remove something that was previously available to everyone (no matter how foul, disgusting or wrong that thing is) that is censorship in it's purest form! Especially when they've done it without informing anyone that they did it!
Disagree completely.. this is clearly a form of censorship and you are also trying to censor another person's POV and think you can decide what the word censorship can and can't be used for.. frankly quite disgusting..
If you remove something that was previously available to everyone (no matter how foul, disgusting or wrong that thing is) that is censorship in it's purest form! Especially when they've done it without informing anyone that they did it!