The NDA must even prevent reviewers from making vague Tweets like "oh man, can't wait to finally be able to share my thoughts on this game I'm playing."
God damn
That bites.I'd be up for that. Sadly I live all the way over in Scotland.
Really!The NDA must even prevent reviewers from making vague Tweets like "oh man, can't wait to finally be able to share my thoughts on this game I'm playing."
yeah i remember around this time when god of war was releasing people who had copies on twitter were sharing impressions and stuff, guess Rockstar really doesn't want that happening with RDR2.
The NDA must even prevent reviewers from making vague Tweets like "oh man, can't wait to finally be able to share my thoughts on this game I'm playing."
God damn
I haven't seen that, but because of your recommendation I'm going to check it out!One of the best western's of all time.
You should give Broken Trail a try if you haven't, it was a great western mini-series made back in 2006 or so that stars Robert Duvall and Thomas Haden Church.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0482857/?ref_=nv_sr_1
I disagree. The very notion of spoilers or someone saying they saw a spoiler is reason enough to make a spoiler thread to contain the inevitable spoilers.
Maybe the NDA is so strict because the game actually sucks.
;)
So are the rumors of the epilogue game being you the player taking command of Arthur's great grandson Paul in the 1970's looking for a buried treasure out in the desert true?
So are the rumors of the epilogue game being you the player taking command of Arthur's great grandson Paul in the 1970's looking for a buried treasure out in the desert true?
that's what I'm thinking. they probably (hopefully) just have copies secured for the moment.
So are the rumors of the epilogue game being you the player taking command of Arthur's great grandson Paul in the 1970's looking for a buried treasure out in the desert true?
Don't be ridiculous!And Paul is with his son Claude who is the 7 old protagonist of GTA3
Not a chance. Reviewers are actively playing this game - they have to be. The game releases at 9 p.m. this coming Thursday and there's no way that they could get a thorough review out that same day without having started playing it this weekend.that's what I'm thinking. they probably (hopefully) just have copies secured for the moment.
? I'm not disputing that reviewers have copies or that they're under strict NDA. I'm saying that if there was a log in requirement, and that's why there's no leaks, that the log in requirement would've leaked.Not a chance. Reviewers are actively playing this game - they have to be. The game releases at 9 p.m. this coming Thursday and there's no way that they could get a thorough review out that same day without having started playing it this weekend.
While I agree Ubisoft is leak town, not every AC leak is unintentional.Literally the entire new trilogy of AC games (Egypt, Greece, Rome) leaked before the first game came out. Ubisoft and leaks go hand-and-hand.
Not a chance. Reviewers are actively playing this game - they have to be. The game releases at 9 p.m. this coming Thursday and there's no way that they could get a thorough review out that same day without having started playing it this weekend.
4 days until the official release date and there still is no single impression of the retail build?! un-fucking-believable.
They simply have to be.
4 days until the official release date and there still is no single impression of the retail build?! un-fucking-believable.
Literally the entire new trilogy of AC games (Egypt, Greece, Rome) leaked before the first game came out. Ubisoft and leaks go hand-and-hand.
Has a high chance to be yeah. That was in one of the leaks for their future plans.Sorry for the offtopic comment but do you mean that the next AC game will be in Rome?
Rockstar's ninjas are making Nintendo's ninjas look pathetic by comparison lol
Ancient Rome yeah. That what the 2016 leak said.Sorry for the offtopic comment but do you mean that the next AC game will be in Rome?
Sorry for the offtopic comment but do you mean that the next AC game will be in Rome?
There was a guy years ago who said it was going to be Egypt, Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome and he also gave other details. It was 100% spot on so it's safe to assume the third game is Rome. And don't worry about going off-topic. This is a spoiler thread without spoilers.
Don't listen to this guy I'm actually in a discord with a EB Games manager who is playing through it now and they confirmed all that as 100% true.This is either a complete load of nonsense or you are officially the first person to post an actual spoiler in this thread.
That's a really good point. If one of my friends was a reviewer and he was playing this game and he said "Hey bro, come over and check it out!!" it would be really, really tempting for me to give at least basic Impressions like "My boy is currently playing this game and it's amazing!"What happens with friends of reviewers who are playing his under NDA?
Is the reviewer only allowed to play the game early if he is alone with no one else around?
And don't worry about going off-topic. This is a spoiler thread without spoilers.
That's a really good point. If one of my friends was a reviewer and he was playing this game and he said "Hey bro, come over and check it out!!" it would be really, really tempting for me to give at least basic Impressions like "My boy is currently playing this game and it's amazing!"
The NDA must even prevent reviewers from making vague Tweets like "oh man, can't wait to finally be able to share my thoughts on this game I'm playing."
God damn
Exactly.You'd probably just cost your friend his job if you did that, the NDA will cover not playing it in front of other people.
That's sensible logic.for sure. plus this game is so damn massive reviewers are probably sacrificing sleep just to have it done and reviewed by thursday.
Yeah well it will be the whole Roman Empire, not just city.Well the real news is that the next AC is set in Rome...again. Disappointed
If that's the case, I feel bad for Alex Navarro, he reviewed Assassin's Creed Odyssey and there's speculation he's reviewing RDR2 for Giant Bomb.for sure. plus this game is so damn massive reviewers are probably sacrificing sleep just to have it done and reviewed by thursday.
So are the rumors of the epilogue game being you the player taking command of Arthur's great grandson Paul in the 1970's looking for a buried treasure out in the desert true?
If that's the case, I feel bad for Alex Navarro, he reviewed Assassin's Creed Odyssey and there's speculation he's reviewing RDR2 for Giant Bomb.
Back to back massive games with long playtime