-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
"Release the Snyder Cut" Raises $26,000 Via GoFundMe to Advertise at SDCC, Ads Are Nowhere Near SDCC
- Thread starter ManaByte
- Start date
Fair enough, it costs more. No chance it's in the millions. A super bowl commercial which reaches 50-100 million people or more costs a few million
I can't really get mad at these fans if they're putting their money towards good causes like suicide prevention.
Let them do what they want.
Let them do what they want.
The sequel to Six for the Six:
To this day I believe this has to be tongue in cheek.
i'm only there for batmanThe sequel to Six for the Six:
christian bale's batman
$26,000 for a $1k ad
(Not sure how much it would actually cost...but 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% sure it wasn't close to $26k.
(Not sure how much it would actually cost...but 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% sure it wasn't close to $26k.
I think half or something like that was raised for Suicide Prevention.
That's pretty much the only upside of this "movement" though.
$13K for suicide prevention seems like a pretty good upside, to be fair.
User Warned: Antagonizing another user
Looks like half that money went to charity for suicide prevention.
OP knows this but wont mention it because that's the type of person he is. Gotta get those lols and hot takes ammiright?
OP knows this but wont mention it because that's the type of person he is. Gotta get those lols and hot takes ammiright?
$26k lmao.
Some washed-up dipshit voice actor who is physically incapable of keeping his hands to himself raised nearly 10x that much to help sue his victims.
Some washed-up dipshit voice actor who is physically incapable of keeping his hands to himself raised nearly 10x that much to help sue his victims.
I agree.
Not that surprised that the OP doesn't include that info though.
The only tweet I've ever had to mute was one talking about how Snyder's Superman isn't a very good representation of the character because a rather fittingly dark and depressing corner of twitter dedicated to seemingly doing nothing but talk about the Snyder cut found it.
I still get angry messages from his fans a year later telling me I'm too stupid to appreciate his movie so yeah, I can believe they'd do this.
I still get angry messages from his fans a year later telling me I'm too stupid to appreciate his movie so yeah, I can believe they'd do this.
the solo movies have moved on from those two for years now and they did fine. no doubt an avengers without them will do fine too.
Did they actually complete the movie before bringing in Joss Whedon? I thought it turned out to be roughly half and half between the two. If that's the case, there is no "cut" to release. Unless they want half a movie of storyboards and temp music I guess.
It was filmed and an assembly cut was shown. Effects and post production were not completed.
I honestly can't imagine a scenario in which Zack Snyder would improve anything.
You would have to think that if such a version existed or was close and not needing much work, WB would likely have released even a digital only version of the cut already and move on and get some quick cash. Obviously the cut either does not exist, it is not financially viable to release it or it would require significant investment to bring it up to scratch and therefore not worth it.
I really don't think it exists and even if it did, it would not significantly change the movie from it is current state of mediocrity.
I really don't think it exists and even if it did, it would not significantly change the movie from it is current state of mediocrity.
He's the one who is fanning all these in the first place. Dude couldn't accept that he got the boot and now he's manipulating the fans to fight on his behalf
Guessing he's pressuring WB indirectly to approach him and pay him money for permission to release the cut. He wants the money
It's good that they raised some money for a good cause, but I think they really need to be realistic. The movie flopped, HARD. There's no way WB are going to sink more money into this to finish off Snyder's vision. It's clearly a vision they weren't all that happy with or invested in...they just wanted something released into theatres in order to get their bonuses paid out. After that, they didn't give a shit, especially when it performed as badly as it did. WB moved on and have had more success in doing so, these people need to move on as well.
No amount of darker colour grading and angsty tone is going to save that poorly conceived turkey of a movie. Making it more consistent is only making it more consistently dreary and draining. 2 hours of it was enough.
No amount of darker colour grading and angsty tone is going to save that poorly conceived turkey of a movie. Making it more consistent is only making it more consistently dreary and draining. 2 hours of it was enough.
I don't get the negativity when every time they raise money for the campaign they also donate to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. You are free to not want to watch or get a new cut of the Justice League movie, sure, but why criticize the people who want it when they're doing something good?
He didnt "get the boot". His daughter commited suicide so he stepped aside for a break.
User Banned (2 Weeks): Insensitive and Inflammatory Commentary
That's the official words, but seems that's an conveniently timed excuse. Movie isn't delayed and he's didn't return to helm another DCEU film since then.
Or they decided to do that after Justice League's reception when it showed his vision wasn't working out for the company. That happens.
Exactly. He's ready to work now and have taken on new projects, but none of it is another DCEU film. WB has moved on, but he hasn't.