Might need to replay the original.
Carlos is essential for Jill's survival and he fights Nemesis.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Resident Evil 3 Remake covers discovered on PSN
- Thread starter benzopil
- Start date
- Status
Carlos is essential for Jill's survival and he fights Nemesis.
I meant for just the cover. The game will likely stick to the original story pretty closely if you're worried about Jill's role being diminished. And at least it clearly puts Jill at the forefront.
The game isn't even out yet lol. I do think that it has the potential to be better based on what duskgolem said.
Because that's not what RE3 is about, and that's not what Nemesis is about. Nemesis says STARS, he doesn't say UBCS.
Code veronica will nodubt be next if they plan to remake anything. But they won't touch 1 and zero.
Of course they could make it over the shoulder like remake but I cant see them remaking a Remaster of a remake.
I don't know. The gum to tooth ratio is a little off in the new one. They look straight outta that episode from Angry Beavers where they let their teeth grow out.
Will wait until I see it in motion before I decide if I hate it or not. He still looks creepy.
Yeah, I agree it does look a bit extra, I'm assuming it will look much better in-game.
4 really needs a remake. Its tone doesn't fit the series at all.
They say they're open to
I've got my doubts they'd bother with Zero, but I believe they've even said publicly re-remaking the first game isn't off the table.
Dying to get into Resident Evil but I don't know if I should play chronologically at this point or release wise. Only have a PS4 and Switch so it's hard to decide if RE2 remake should be played before RE4 for example.
Don't see why that matters at all. He fought Nemesis in the original game and I wouldn't mind seeing him developed a little more in the remake.
I'm also happy to see some Latine representation. I always liked Carlos in the original[/QUOTE]
Yeah it's been a while since I played this game and I understand wanting to be sure the female protagonist gets to look like the proper badass she is...but I'm pretty sure Jill would be dead without Carlos and he does fight Nemesis straight up.
So if anything, you should be hoping it's less like the original, haha.
So if anything, you should be hoping it's less like the original, haha.
Start with either Resident Evil (the original, the remake, the remaster, whatever one though the 2014 Remaster is the easiest one to get), Resident Evil 2 REmake, Resident Evil 4, or Resident Evil 7.
All four of those games have some plot connections, but all tell rather stand-alone stories and make for pretty great starting off points.
Do you think Code Veronica has enough clout for them to possibly remake that down the road?
I think CVX has the most to gain from a REmake. Plus I love new Claire and her voice actress so I hope she gets more games as Claire.
I played some RE4 yesterday and that game is showing it's age control-wise. I'm open to that being remade too.
I played some RE4 yesterday and that game is showing it's age control-wise. I'm open to that being remade too.
Play in the chronological order if you are interested in the story:
Zero - remake - remake 2 - code veronica - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7
If you dont habe the time just play: remake, remake 2 and 7
I will pay it. I paid for the RESIDENT EVIL voice guy for the RE2 Remake. I'll pay for my iconic Jill outfit.
I would argue not really. He fights Nemesis all right, but Nemesis is not really fighting him. Not in the same way he fights Jill. I talk about this here.
I'm beyond worried at this point. Maybe it's just how much I've seen people looking down on RE3 (you can see it in this very thread) and this put in my head Capcom might do the same.
It doesn't really matter a whole lot if you ask me. RE2, RE4 and RE2r all feel like they are from different universes.
Play chronological the numbered ones at least. It's the easiest way.
I can tell you right now though nothing is official yet (as far I know, I think they're waiting to see how REmake 3 performs, but I also am not super up to date) that remaking RE1, Code Veronica, RE4 and even RE5 have all been things they've been talking/thinking about internally. I don't know which one they'll choose to do next if things go forward though.
Speaking of personal feelings, I think Code Veronica needs a remake the most. It's original game suffers from some big game design flaws, but there's a lot of potential with its setting, characters, monsters, art direction, etc. I'm hoping a Code Veronica remake happens, I feel it has the most to gain from the remake treatment.
It's factually incorrect.
You can't look at a rock and say, "In my opinion, this is cotton candy."
That's the exact problem with remaking 4. They change too much of what made RE4 the game it is and people are gonna go ham.
That game NEEDS to retain some of the crazy factor, Leon still needs to be able to go Donnie Yen on people, and deliver smart-assed one-liners. They mess up what's arguably the most beloved game in the series and they'll lose a lot of the good faith they've built up with the great games we've been getting lately.
RE2's remake included an updated version of Claire's original outfit as an alternate costume. It wasn't even a pre-order bonus or something in a special edition! I suspect they'll do the same here.
Did they ever fix the fact that her "classic" costume wasn't actually her classic costume because they made the weird decision to get rid of the black shirt?
Remake 1 is perfect for me, but I'm extremely open to exploring the Spencer Mansion again from this current new behind the shoulder formula. I think both can exist and provide unique gameplay styles to audiences.
EDIT: What I'm saying Capcom is remake Resident Evil 1 again. Do it (Nods head)
EDIT: What I'm saying Capcom is remake Resident Evil 1 again. Do it (Nods head)
It's the Japanese uncensored version, in Japan that have regular "censored" versions of gore, and then an "uncensored" Z-version for gore, due to Japanese regulations.
edit: Beaten a bit, but yeah.
If that user feels anything like I do, it matters because taking the spotlight away from an iconic female character in favor of a male character would be very disappointing.
And yes we all know what Carlos does, he can do it all again and still not make it feel like less of a Jill focused game (by not expanding his role* further).
* Not characterization.
Because Spring 2020 will be too soon... summer is always an avoidable time for big AAA games, that's why I said September.
But yeah... June could happen because May is booked for The Last of Us II and April and March besides being too soon it's PACKED.
This is basically my take, I love REmake and think it's a perfect remake, but I'm not against a RE Engine Spencer Mansion and reimagining of the game. I think both can exist.
Since when a man saving a woman is problematic? Not that Jill is ever portrayed a damsel in distress.
This. The originals are nice, but not necessary if you're trying to get into/catch up with the story.
REmake is better than the original release, as is REmake 2(imo), but opinions are more mixed on that.
You think they'll update RE2 to include zombified Brad? Did anything ever come out of that Steam leak anyway?
hoping they made him look like putinCan't wait to see this baddy
- Status