Lol the entire source of this article is that a job listing says "consoles" plural instead of singular.
Demon's Souls back on the menu boys
Lol the entire source of this article is that a job listing says "consoles" plural instead of singular.
A job site saying "Help bring our content to life, creating industry leading visual effects at industry leading performance on the most advanced home consoles" doesn't mean their game is coming to multiple consoles. This is a stretch even by 'random websites reporting on job listings' standards.
So what re they doing SoTN in 3D? It's supposed be a remaining after all.
He said a great remake.
I'd Rather have a remake of Metal Gear 1 and 2 than a remake of MGS
You're not gonna get an RE2-caliber remake out of a bunch of devs who have never made a full game on their own.
So what do you expect from Demon's Souls then? I would consider SOTC a great remake even though they didn't change much.
So what do you expect from Demon's Souls then? I would consider SOTC a great remake even though they didn't change much.
That's how I would define a pointless remake
At least with Resi 2 and FF7R they're actually changing things up. The original Resi 2 and FF7 will/are still worth playing even if you want/like the remakes, as they offer something different
SOTC is just SOTC with better graphics, almost nothing of value would be lost if it didn't exist, as people could just play the PS2/PS3 version and get virtually the same experience
Bring that Demon's remaster to the largest souls community on PC with crossplay. Should be fun.
it's probably down to mostly the crowd of people that started with the series on subsistence and the full 3D camera because pretty much from that point on it has had that camera but i honestly don't mind the first game provided i have some sort of dualshock controllerI don't even understand why people want a MGS1 remake
MGS1 is an all time classic, but it's a game with 23 guards and about a dozen rooms. 1/3rd of the game is back tracking and the last half of the game is a boss rush
So do people want a 1 to 1 remake, which will look and play weird because it's a game with 23 guards and about a dozen rooms. 1/3rd of the game is back tracking and the last half of the game is a boss rush, or do they want to greatly expand the scope and scale of the game, without Kojima being involved?
Both of those sounds like pretty terrible ideas to me
4K graphics and amazing models will just be jarring with MGS1's design and mechanics, and an expanded game would be fan fiction
I can live without both
Nonsense. The SOTC remake is amazing. And a lot of people don't want/like to play games with ~15 years old graphics and performance so they would have skipped it. Even the PS3 remastered version. The SOTC remake was great for the nostalgia fans and new gamers who never played SOTC.That's how I would define a pointless remake
At least with Resi 2 and FF7R they're actually changing things up. The original Resi 2 and FF7 will/are still worth playing even if you want/like the remakes, as they offer something different
SOTC is just SOTC with better graphics, almost nothing of value would be lost if it didn't exist, as people could just play the PS2/PS3 version and get virtually the same experience
I'd rather have the much better looking running and looking experience, but I get your point. I cannot see myself ever wanting to play a game from the PS2 or earlier era again.
I remember really struggling with MGS3 because of the camera. The maps are much more open whereas MGS2 the static camera worked loads better. I was so glad when I got a hold of Subsistence.it's probably down to mostly the crowd of people that started with the series on subsistence and the full 3D camera because pretty much from that point on it has had that camera but i honestly don't mind the first game provided i have some sort of dualshock controller
So what do you expect from Demon's Souls then? I would consider SOTC a great remake even though they didn't change much.
Nonsense. The SOTC remake is amazing. And a lot of people don't want/like to play games with ~15 years old graphics and performance so they would have skipped it. Even the PS3 remastered version. The SOTC remake was great for the nostalgia fans and new gamers who never played SOTC.
Yeah and I can understand that, but it's still pretty lame, and why we're probably entering a phase where developers will bust a gut remaking perfectly fine games from 10-15 years ago to appease people who wouldn't buy a remaster instead of making new IP and new entries into series'
Look at the thrist for a Demon's Souls remake. It's a 10 year old game. If it gets remastered it will play really well, but people still want it remade from scratch. Why not give a developer license to make Demon's Souls 2 or something new? Is remaking a decade old game that just needs a few QoL improvements and a remaster really necessary?
Considering Bluepoint ONLY does remakes and remasters we are not losing out anything. So yeah give me the remake.
Well, it's the boring choice, so you'll probably get your wish, but even if we limit their next game to a remake, there are more interesting games they could remake, or more worthwhile remakes they could make, where they could expand on the original game instead of doing a prettier copy/paste job
I just wanna say that I love how you keep repeatedly hinting at them making a Demon's Souls remake without ever actually outright saying so. Idk why but I find it hilarious.A job site saying "Help bring our content to life, creating industry leading visual effects at industry leading performance on the most advanced home consoles" doesn't mean their game is coming to multiple consoles. This is a stretch even by 'random websites reporting on job listings' standards.
That post is still correct though.
Might be a boring choice to you, but it's a great choice. It's the grandfather of Souls games that most Souls fans have never played.
Yeah, so wouldn't playing the original game be the better choice than a cover band remake?
I'd be all over a Demon's Souls remaster. It would be the same great game with better performance. A remake would be the same game but it would look better and feel a little off
To be fair, it will probably get a remake so I'll be on the wrong side of history anyway. I beat Demon's Souls, and I'd play it again if it gets remastered, but I have no interest in seeing everything I've seen before, remade so that it looks and plays in exactly the same way. It just seems pointless, but that's what a lot of people seem to want, so I'm sure that's what they'll get
I'll be over here, yelling at my cloud
Lol no
BluePoint literally mentioned their PS5 game on Wired PS5 reveal
It is Demons Souls Remake
But it did come with a digital copy of mgs1. I'm sure it did on ps3 gonna go check.He said a great remake.
Personally I find it really strange that Metal Gear HD collection never made it off past gen consoles. I mean even the Vita has a port.
Would be cool if it ended up being Metal Gear 1 and 2 remake released with a new port of HD collection (including MGS1 this time).
They did allude in their tease tweet there were possibly 2 projects going so this doesn't deconfirm shit.
I fucking hope not. Its been done before already and I can't see them bringing anything to the table except 4K graphics.
I figured it was a job ad that listed experience developing for PS4/XB1 as a requirement but it turns out it's even dumber. Amazing.A job site saying "Help bring our content to life, creating industry leading visual effects at industry leading performance on the most advanced home consoles" doesn't mean their game is coming to multiple consoles. This is a stretch even by 'random websites reporting on job listings' standards.
Crisis averted.Lol the entire source of this article is that a job listing says "consoles" plural instead of singular.
Pointless? It would be awesome and much needed. That game is stuck on PlayStation FFS.
Ah right. I had the collection on Vita and I knew Peace Walker came with the console HD collection but didn't think MGS1 was included too.But it did come with a digital copy of mgs1. I'm sure it did on ps3 gonna go check.
Edit- actually it's the legacy collection has 1-4 but 1is a digital ps1 classic.
That's exactly what a lot of fans (me, for example) wanted. I don't want a remake that plays nothing like the original game but just has the same name and characters in it. I want the game I've played and loved over a decade ago, but with todays graphics and performance. And that's what they did with the SOTC remake. A few little changes here and there, okay. But changing a lot in a game like Shadow of the Colossus? Or ICO? Making it something totally different? No, thanks.It's a really solid product, but it doesn't offer anything new or unique when compared to the original or remaster other than it looks nicer
Because the PS1/PS2 graphics are horrendous and pixelated. Most of them (see MediEvil) are some first-gen 3D games on consoles. While todays graphics are fine. A remake to up the graphics to todays standards just makes sense.Why not pick the best 5 games and remake them every generation if we need to remake something after a decade?
Because there is a difference with games like MediEvil or SOTC which are totally pixelated, compared to current-gen games like Bloodborne. It's not hard to understand and you don't have to act like you don't get it.Why make more Bloodborne games, when we can just remake Bloodborne every generation, after all a lot of people don't want/like to play games with ~15 years old graphics and performance