An event focused on a minority/target group that only invites said minority/target group is not necessarily discrimination.
I agree, this is in now way, shape or form discrimination.
An event focused on a minority/target group that only invites said minority/target group is not necessarily discrimination.
Yes, if Riot isn't trying to correct the root of the issue, which is the toxic bro culture that's recently been exposed, then the events are pandering because they don't reflect the core values of the company. Instead, the events represent an attempt to improve Riot's image as a direct response to controversy.
When I said "do the panels exactly as planned" I meant proceed as though there are no men present. Allowing someone to attend and observe doesn't mean you have to alter the program for them or invite their participation.
Sure it does, but there are plenty of avenues that offer similar presentations that are open to everyone, it's not exactly a new concept, the only distinction here is that it is aimed at getting specific under-represented groups into game development, it's an attempt to even the playing field. But that's not even what I was arguing. Look at what you wrote earlier.
How do you even enforce this? Given that this event is only 8 hours in total, do you think that it is wise to spend time on policing the attendees, is it even practical?
Thank you for making the thread. I went to the subreddit last night after the semifinal matches and had to double-check thinking I was reading KotakuInAction.
This is not about the outrage caused because they couldn't access ONE room for a few hours in an festival event catered towards them. They are not even at PAX. This is about the same disgusting GG bullshit and mentality that's everywhere in these "gamers" communities.
These are the type of posts they are upvoting:
- When Jessica Price and another developer started insulting their playerbase and being sexist on Twitter, the CEO of ArenaNet (Guild Wars 2) fired them the very day he came back from his 4th of July vacation.
- I was so proud of ANet when i saw that forum post lol. Instantly bough both expansions.
- i dont understand how we have an example of arenanet doing the right thing and immediately firing an employee for almost exactly the same thing that people like klein have been doing for years while riot has been sitting on their hands and going "well, this is fine" while everything burns around them.
- Yes this is the way to beat your own internal sexism Riot, punish people outside of the company to virtue signal.
- Some male Riot employees are sexist so what do they do for the community? They make an event to ban innocent male fans from attending. Guess Riot is aboard the SJW train now.
- This is how you kill a game, not by making it unplayable or unbalanced for a patch or two, but by going against your playerbase. What I read today in some thread, posted by actual rioters is just not okay, and I'm not even talking about twitter. I'm going to stop spending money while the situation isn't resolved, but I'm already contemplating quitting this game because now I think more about that political/gender crap than the fun I have.
They are not arguing in good faith. They never do.
By the way, in this Twitter thread Morrello (Lead Designer at Riot) explains why these types of events are important.
"Pandering to their audience"? It's the complete opposite lel
If Riot is doing other presentations on those topics that are open to all of their fans, then that's fine. If this is the only place where Riot is touching on those topics at this convention, I think that sucks.
That reddit shithole is the proof that we desperately need more events like this.
That just makes me laugh, given Riot's godawful track-record of how they treat women and lgbt folk.
With that in mind, David Klein's twitter thread feels like projection.
This definitely reflects changes to their culture behind closed doors, right? It's definitely not a contrived attempt to save face by pandering to their audience, right?
You've seen reddit right? It's a hugely impopular decision. It's the opposite of pandering.
All I can say is I hope they're making a good faith attempt to correct course. If that's what they're actually doing, then I do wish them well.You've seen reddit right? It's a hugely impopular decision. It's the opposite of pandering.
Y'know, reading through stuff like this, and a lot of the Reddit comments (probably a bad idea, but I'm a glutton for punishment sometimes I guess. Anyway) and stuff and seeing the "problems" people have with this... am I the only one getting echoes of the exact same arguments that white people try to make about being able to use the n-word here? Like, it's the same exact nonsense in both cases:
"Not letting white people say the n-word only fosters more divisiveness"/"Not letting men into the event only makes things more divisive"
"You don't fight racism with more racism and not letting white people say it is itself racist"/"You don't combat exclusion with more exclusion or sexism with more sexism"
"People who think only black people should say it are the real racists"/"Riot just again proving themselves to be the real sexists and just creating more sexism"
Can't just be me seeing that, right? Like, it's all the same nonsense and greatest hits that gets tossed around there, and it's just so entirely missing the point in both cases, because in both cases they're not even interested in seeing the actual point at all. They just see the word "no" and freak out and at that point, whatever the actual point or logic or reasoning or benefit it doesn't matter whatsoever. All that matters is that they were told no, and THAT becomes what everything is about and nothing else is allowed to be discussed until that is adequately remedied in some way, actual point and benefits being completely lost and derailed, because they weren't truly interested to begin with. Just being told "no."
That aside and with that out of my system, for those who are genuinely interested in understanding what's going on here and the benefit of stuff like this, as has been linked by someone else, see Twitter threads like this one that lay out the gist and really get the benefits across here:
True, that's how reddit works. The majority sentiment on the subreddit is that, though. Even outside the subreddit, gaming culture in general isn't very good at being inclusive for women and nonbinary people. League community isn't the worst one, but it's not on the list of better communities, I think.
Hopefully they do, yes. They need to change their workplace culture in addition to efforts like this.All I can say is I hope they're making a good faith attempt to correct course. If that's what they're actually doing, then I do wish them well.
Riot games said:We're going to offer some support for women and non-binary people who want to get into games
Gamers said:But I'm a man! Why don't I get support for women and non-binary people???
Uh oh, someone's being rude to customers on twitter.
Good thing they're a white dude.
I agree with you, but reaching out to female and non-binary developers and designers in order to hire them might be a (small) step towards changing that culture.Yes, if Riot isn't trying to correct the root of the issue, which is the toxic bro culture that's recently been exposed, then the events are pandering because they don't reflect the core values of the company. Instead, the events represent an attempt to improve Riot's image as a direct response to controversy.
Basically these events don't mean shit if rape jokes are still OK in Riot's internal events and documents, and if employees are still pressured to get on board with the frat boy humor described in the most recent account of the company's culture.
Our First Steps Forward | Riot Games
We will weave this change into our cultural DNA and leave no room for sexism or misogyny. Inclusivity, diversity, respect, and equality are all non-negotiable. While there is much to improve, there is a tremendous amount of good at Riot that will drive this change.
To people considering a career at Riot: We understand if you have some doubt or hesitation. But we also need you now more than ever. We need people who will drive change and fight for what's right. Building Riot wasn't easy. Rebuilding it won't be either. But the promise of Riot's future is stronger than ever and if you're up for being part of the solution, we want to meet you.
[...] We're committed to doing things the right way, and we know the change we need isn't going to happen overnight. We are taking everything we've learned from Rioters and leading culture-change experts, and we are starting to develop a plan with substance.
[...] Expanding the Culture, Diversity, and Inclusion (D&I) Initiative: We've built a new team to lead our cultural evolution. This group and their work will impact every corner of this organization, and will also accelerate our existing cultural and inclusion work. We are all committed to keeping the best parts of today's Riot—like our focus on player empathy—while tirelessly looking toward the future. The team will be accountable to our CEO, Nicolo Laurent, directly.
[...] Third-Party Evaluation: We have engaged two leading consultants on culture change to provide us with their expertise and recommendations as we rebuild Riot's culture. Our goal isn't just to be good; it's to become a leader on diversity, inclusion, and culture. We're asking them to develop mechanisms to measure our progress and hold us accountable against this objective.
[...] Reevaluating Recruiting: We're accelerating our efforts to make our recruiting system more open. We're overhauling our job descriptions to ensure they're readily accessible to all demographic groups; reassessing which universities we recruit from; and expanding the pools from which we target our candidates.
Thanks ^-^
Providing a safe and inclusive environment for excluded folks isn't exclusion.I'm actually glad Reddit pushed back against this. You don't combat exclusion with... more exclusion.
How would you know what is effective in combating exclusion ?My thoughts on Riot have plummeted over the last few weeks. Their wildly absurd company culture and this stupid PAX snafu are not good looks.
I'm actually glad Reddit pushed back against this. You don't combat exclusion with... more exclusion.
I'm actually glad Reddit pushed back against this. You don't combat exclusion with... more exclusion.
A large-scale multi-day games industry event had a room, A ROOM!, set up for underrepresented groups in the industry.
I swear a lot of these guys would sit in the kids playroom at their local restaurant demanding not to be excluded.
My thoughts on Riot have plummeted over the last few weeks. Their wildly absurd company culture and this stupid PAX snafu are not good looks.
I'm actually glad Reddit pushed back against this. You don't combat exclusion with... more exclusion.
I don't see the issue. At least a all Womans league tournament will not have a bunch of creeper dudes. I feel like a lot of league players are, yes specifically men.
Providing a safe and inclusive environment for excluded folks isn't exclusion.
The safe and inclusive environment for one group is created by excluding another group
Don't know how you can say it ain't when it clearly is.
It's not a question of whether it's excluding another group. It certainly is.The safe and inclusive environment for one group is created by excluding another group
Don't know how you can say it ain't when it clearly is.
Excellent illustrative analogy.Its is completely wrong to be thinking of it in terms of exclusion.
It is an assistance that is only being made available to people that need it.
People who can walk don't need free wheelchairs, and they don't get them. They're not being excluded.
Complaining about "Hey, how come those dudes get free wheelchairs and I don't?" is what people are doing here.
Very good way to put it.Its is completely wrong to be thinking of it in terms of exclusion.
It is an assistance that is only being made available to people that need it.
People who can walk don't need free wheelchairs, and they don't get them. They're not being excluded.
Complaining about "Hey, how come those dudes get free wheelchairs and I don't?" is what people are doing here.
My thoughts on Riot have plummeted over the last few weeks. Their wildly absurd company culture and this stupid PAX snafu are not good looks.
I'm actually glad Reddit pushed back against this. You don't combat exclusion with... more exclusion.
Okay, let me ELI5 this for you;
yes, saying men can't go to a dedicated career advice seminar is unfair. It is a small unfairness, specifically intended to address a bigger unfairness, that - for whatever reason - it is harder for a woman or non-binary person to get into that job in the first place, so they are being given more help to try and address that.
Its like taxes.
Rich people pay more taxes than poor people do.
and yes, that is unfair.
On a very small level, because rich people having a ton more money than poor people do is unfair on a much larger scale.
Can you really not understand this?
Its is completely wrong to be thinking of it in terms of exclusion.
It is an assistance that is only being made available to people that need it.
People who can walk don't need free wheelchairs, and they don't get them. They're not being excluded.
Complaining about "Hey, how come those dudes get free wheelchairs and I don't?" is what people are doing here.
I understand. I just wish people that support this were honest about what it is instead of being all "It's not exclusion"