Hard to form an opinion with how little you get to see. The environments seem fairly low fidelity but the character models could make up for it.
The footage with no gameplay does look boring, yes.
Only if there's german suplexes and moonsaults off of the railing.
Nintendo Soup is kind of bad...they really do report a lot of bogus stuff lol.You're welcome. I'll have more ubisoft game news for you in the future, hopefully!!
Also, I gave some more asset file images to some news websites, such as NintendoSoup.
I can promise you the person who shared this info with me is in no trouble. He gave me much more than what was shared. You see, many people are partaking in these playtests, and he manually edited out the watermarks that gave away who it came from. I've made extra sure to only publicize what he made sure was safe!!
.Assets for a Nintendo Switch controller layout have been found which confirms the game will be heading to to Switch (below is for Xbox).
There will be quick play matches, ranked matches, custom matches and tournaments you can select from on the main menu.
.The sound options menu allows you to change certain aspects such as the crowd, music, voices, sound effects and even includes a streamer mode.
.The gameplay options menu has 2 aiming modes (Price and Flick) and will allow you to alter the X and Y sensitivity.
.Game will be online only as it immediatly searches for a server.
Not sure where your logic is coming from if it's under NDA...and removing watermarks doesn't discount that.I can promise you the person who shared this info with me is in no trouble. He gave me much more than what was shared. You see, many people are partaking in these playtests, and he manually edited out the watermarks that gave away who it came from. I've made extra sure to only publicize what he made sure was safe!!
You absolutely can't promise that at all.I can promise you the person who shared this info with me is in no trouble. He gave me much more than what was shared. You see, many people are partaking in these playtests, and he manually edited out the watermarks that gave away who it came from. I've made extra sure to only publicize what he made sure was safe!!
You misunderstand what I mean. Surely the playtester who sent me all of this broke NDA, however he seemed to have made sure it wouldn't be traced back to him as dozens of people had this. There was actually a full playtest about 2 and a half weeks ago with even more people having seen all of this. I can't speak for the tester as I was only introduced to him by him giving me all this, but he assured me he was safe.Not sure where your logic is coming from if it's under NDA...and removing watermarks doesn't discount that.
So basically, you're held accountable for this because you know exactly who it is who leaked the info. That's what you're admitting now...You misunderstand what I mean. Surely the playtester who sent me all of this broke NDA, however he seemed to have made sure it wouldn't be traced back to him as dozens of people had this. There was actually a full playtest about 2 and a half weeks ago with even more people having seen all of this. I can't speak for the tester as I was only introduced to him by him giving me all this, but he assured me he was safe.
News websites already published the playtest date, as the source said that was fine. It isn't strictly me saying the playtest date. Ubisoft knows where it's coming from. The problem is that it includes hundreds of people, and the leaker removed any trace of which one it is. They normally wouldn't leak it, but this is a rather large test.Why the fuck would you even say in public the playtest date and very obviously infer that's where you got the info from ? Are you sane ?
This post was made because I leaked the video already before it made its way here. In fact, as you may remember, I leaked images yesterday. So of course I know the source. However, what I'll say is that I was asked to share it all. This wasn't something that I personally asked info on, it was given to me and I was told what to do with it. Which is, of course, a rare situation.So basically, you're held accountable for this because you know exactly who it is who leaked the info. That's what you're admitting now...
I think it's best if you don't share any more details about how you got the leak and where it came from. As you can already see, people are putting you on the spot, and I'm not sure if what you're saying might help trace back the source.News websites already published the playtest date, as the source said that was fine. It isn't strictly me saying the playtest date. Ubisoft knows where it's coming from. The problem is that it includes hundreds of people, and the leaker removed any trace of which one it is. They normally wouldn't leak it, but this is a rather large test.
This post was made because I leaked the video already before it made its way here. In fact, as you may remember, I leaked images yesterday. So of course I know the source. However, what I'll say is that I was asked to share it all. This wasn't something that I personally asked info on, it was given to me and I was told what to do with it. Which is, of course, a rare situation.
You make a good point. According to him, this isn't anything new and he's not in any danger. But I'll take your advice.I think it's best if you don't share any more details about how you got the leak and where it came from. As you can already see, people are putting you on the spot, and I'm not sure if what you're saying might help trace back the source.
But I'm sure that the more you say about the source, the more people will complain and you might say something it's not meant to be shared.
Not sure where your logic is coming from if it's under NDA...and removing watermarks doesn't discount that.
mmhmmIt's clearly more of a budget game like Trials than a AAA type game. This is why rare was saying to keep expectations down. It's a smaller title
So, it's a he.You make a good point. According to him, this isn't anything new and he's not in any danger. But I'll take your advice.
According to what they've told me, they've done this several times, and sometimes given away just as many details, including noting the info was from playtesting. Of course, I won't mention any specific instances. Long story short -- I wouldn't worry.
Whoops, my apologies! I assumed genders there. I genuinely have no idea what gender they are, or anything about them for that matter. They gave me the info on a throwaway account (literally), told me what to post, and told me that they have no concerns and that they are not new to doing this. It's a really odd situation. I have no other way of describing how I got this info. That's really... just it. I didn't go to this person, they just came to me on a sockpuppet. Of course, I didn't buy it until they showed a full build, and then today there were copyright strikes on images.
I'm confused, where are you all drawing these opinions from? I don't see a second of actual gameplay in the OP.
This is an alpha build, yes.Very underwhelming graphics. Hopefully this is alpha footage etc. Maybe we see a announcement at e3?
You still don't comprehend you're complying with a breach of an NDA, which puts you yourself at risk. Oh but hey that's fine here's a video of some background sets for a game...According to what they've told me, they've done this several times, and sometimes given away just as many details, including noting the info was from playtesting. Of course, I won't mention any specific instances. Long story short -- I wouldn't worry.
Whoops, my apologies! I assumed genders there. I genuinely have no idea what gender they are, or anything about them for that matter. They gave me the info on a throwaway account (literally), told me what to post, and told me that they have no concerns and that they are not new to doing this. It's a really odd situation. I have no other way of describing how I got this info. That's really... just it. I didn't go to this person, they just came to me on a sockpuppet. Of course, I didn't buy it until they showed a full build, and then today there were copyright strikes on images.