"His country's" clear direction was black people were property, not people.The essence of his statement is literally that America was better when we still had slavery. He tries to dress it up with some bullshit about how families (exclusively white families, you would imagine) were still "united" and the country had a "clear direction". All of which is complete bullshit that makes no sense if you have any understanding of American history, unless you are analyzing it through the lens of the white, slaveholding class. It's the only interpretation that makes any sense!
All you need to do to understand idealistic white racial politics in the 20th century is watch Gone With the Wind, maybe the most successful film of all time.
The premise of the film was mourning when the South was "great."
Roy Moore clings to this playbook like a true pre-civil rights act piece of human excrement.
Politicians of his ilk, so clearly bigoted, used to be the norm in this country.
This is no dog-whistle. Moore is the type of politician who would stand in school doorways. It hasn't been that long.
At this point I'm convinced that Roy Moore could have actual slaves and still get elected.
mmm, delicious caping for a pedophile who wants to reinstate a time of slavery.It's a shitty, misrepresentative title designed to sensationalize a statement that's already gross enough.
What not making sense?
No, they're not. What he's saying is that Slavery is bad(In a patronizing manner) but not as bad as not having his archaic vision of family unity without the gays mucking everything up.Yes, the guy is a cunt but he clearly says despite slavery he thinks that is the time. It's semantics but everyone is just wilfully ignoring it.
He specifically wasn't referring to the 20th century. Not to mention this is the guy who thinks homosexuality should be as illegal as beastiality and thinks 9/11 was caused by homosexuality.
Sorry, didn't mean to quote you.No, they're not. What he's saying is that Slavery is bad(In a patronizing manner) but not as bad as not having his archaic vision of family unity without the gays mucking everything up.
A lot of things should have happened but were ignored, put off, or outright denied in favor of keeping the status quo that existed from the time of the first established colonies.
He's implying that it was 'worth it'.I don't want to defend the creep but he did say "even though we had slavery" which implies that it's a bad thing.
amazing that this distinction needs to be made and you know, people don't actually see it.
I don't want to defend the creep but he did say "even though we had slavery" which implies that it's a bad thing.
Seriously, people. And he's only doing that much because he'd rather dog whistle.
"Even though we had slavery" implies that some people just might have been slaves, and while that is not 'optimal' it was the greatest time for America overall. Really doesn't change much.I don't want to defend the creep but he did say "even though we had slavery" which implies that it's a bad thing.
"Even though the rent's a little high, I love my apartment", "Even though it was a bit overlong, the movie is entirely worth paying full price for", "Even though we argue, I wouldn't trade a single moment with my wife for the world." What do these sound like? If he thinks and actually understands how bad slavery was he wouldn't look back fondly on that time for any reason unless he thought it was worth the suffering of black people.I don't want to defend the creep but he did say "even though we had slavery" which implies that it's a bad thing.
It's pretty telling that when asked about the last great period in America, you'd think back to the days of slavery. You're basically saying that the wrong side won the Civil War, and it fucked everything up.Yes, the guy is a cunt but he clearly says despite slavery he thinks that is the time. It's semantics but everyone is just wilfully ignoring it.
Some Alabama people disgust me. I mean, voting for an accused pedophile just because he has an (R) by his name and not a (D).
To those who will vote for him: fuck you sick fuckos for wanting to vote for a guy who thought the time period when you had slavery was great, a guy who apaprently is a pedophile.
This is pissing me of to a great extend. Have you no morales? No dignity? You think Jesus would accept this guy? Perhaps old testament Jesus, but not new testament Jesus.
I think Jesus would have voted for the American Socialist Alternative.
It implies that it's a better thing than the current situation, which is black people aren't property, women are allowed to vote, gay people are allowed to get married, and we generally frown upon fucking teenagers.I don't want to defend the creep but he did say "even though we had slavery" which implies that it's a bad thing.
It's a shitty, misrepresentative title designed to sensationalize a statement that's already gross enough.
Seriously, what the hell.
Liberals aren't losing anything by removing Franken.This is guy is on his way in, Franken is on his way out. Can't find a better example of why liberalism is a losing enterprise. There is no bottom for conservatives. An enemy with no conscience is really hard to beat.
My statement was about more than Al Franken.
A weird thing to use as an example for it then haha
I will! I think it also matters for all elections that year that feature the Democrat party, ie a party that it not actively supporting gropers anymore.Come back to me after the 2018 special election and we'll see if you're right or not.
Not bad enough as he considers that period of time to be the last time America was great.I don't want to defend the creep but he did say "even though we had slavery" which implies that it's a bad thing.