Discussion in 'Video Games' started by Wander_, May 31, 2018.
Overcooked 2 coming to wreck second marriages.
So it is either pauses when lag and have lots of people complaining about it online or no online
I think the Overcooked devs if they don't implement it just don't have the money or maybe time to invest in it.
tell me one and i will explain how it would fuck up the timing of a stage
Like why are you arguing against online for overcooked?
Why is it bad to have the option as opposed to strictly local play?
I'm not familiar with online IP/TCP stuff for games but I know there have been plenty of demanding games that have done online so really it comes down to time and money investment to achieve it. And I completely understand if the devs can't do that to achieve any kind of decent online.... Which is why I'll pass.
Overcooked is 4 players getting the timing of the stage right and the timing of each other right. One player that lags without a huge pause and the machine is completely destroyed. And huge pauses kill the urgency.
Rollback mechanics can make objects dissapear from your hand because another player already grabbed before so all the ingredients you went to tap are not on the plate anymore.
Online in overcooked (the first one at least) would be more rage than fun
I don't know what their reasoning was, just speculating - point being, the CEO of a giant corporation may have a little more insight into a situation than some dude sitting at home playing video games.
Every time I see these rumor threads for the Switch bumped a part of me hopes that the update will say something involving the Mother 3 rumors from Emily and Eurogamer. It is very cool that DB Fighter Z is coming to the Switch but I still hope Nintendo has a few more surprises in store for us next week.
As much as I'd like to see a Blizzard game like Overwatch come onto the Switch or even Hearthstone which makes a lot of sense playing a card game on the go, I think its safe to say blizzard has zero plans to put their products on a Nintendo Platform ever again. Even if the Switch is on fire, Blizzard probably doesn't see the console as something for their software to make a profit off of.
Blizzard may not want to launch a 30 FPS Overwatch for Switch which is a fine decision for them to make.
Diablo trilogy would sell like hotcakes
Would never happen =(
There have been rumors of Diablo 4 happening relatively soon, right? If not being announced this year then maybe next?
If so Switch getting Diablo 3 when everyone is excited about Diablo 4 would be pretty annoying.
Another one. When Smash Switch was announced (so, in March) he said "expect almost no cut, most likely any, from Smash Switch", and a few weeks ago Emily (so, late may) said the exact same thing on Discord.
He's not like Marcus, tweeting every shit that will most likely happen and shit that random people told him.
Stealth barely "hint" at anything. Most of the time he's just a chilling dude talking about Nintendo's games, predicting stuff, talking about his hope and all. But sometimes (which is very rare) he says "this will happen, I heard this from someone I trust". That's it.
One more thing. Stealth is followed on Twitter by Emily, Jordan Amaro (french level designer at Nintendo EPD), Krysta Yang (Nintendo of America, Nintendo Minute), Tom Phillips (Eurogamer), Peer Schneider (IGN), and a lot of other gaming journalists from Game Informer, GameSpot... So he's definitely not a random liar like Marcus.
I personally do not lump Activision or Blizzard into that camp, and I think their Switch support will surprise a lot of people. Not because they’re infallible geniuses but merely because they like money.
diablo 3 teased for switch
diablo 3 leaked only for PS4/Xone