• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nov 14, 2017
4,928
not vetting social media posts for high-level staffers seems to be something most candidates are bad at. i don't know why.
It's the same at Downing Street too. I think we've finally reached the point with social media where everyone has decided to just say fuck it. Who knows what dumb shit someone has said, just hope their past doesn't blow up.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
not vetting social media posts for high-level staffers seems to be something most candidates are bad at. i don't know why.
She wasn't vetted because she was Turner's personal friend. Loyalty was valued over having heinous views on Muslims/immigrants. The board was rightfully upset/angry when they found out, and Turner refused to fire her until the story was leaked to the public.

And then Turner was rewarded for this by getting a high level position on Bernie's national campaign.
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459
So you understood the stereotype of combative, angry black women and decided to roll with it anyway? Turner has made mistakes in the past and there are valid criticisms there, but this is absolutely not it.

No, you're making a fair observation that if I knew enough to consider caveating that, that maybe I should have made a different point - or approached my criticism in a different way - and I will eat that because I can't possibly relate to how hurtful it is - but in the context of this discussionI I wrongly assumed that people would know exactly what individual issue I was refering to - especially given her relationshp to the person in the lawsuit - and I thought I was making a salient point about a specific person. I can't unphrase it - I can apologize and do for unintentionally insulting rhetoric - but I hope at least that one or two of you guys quoting me are aware that my intention isn't and wasn't that.

I fucked up here, and I'll go out of my way to avoid it in future, and you should report me if you think it was some sneaky bullshit, but I still have serious political concerns with how the Campaign is going to run for the next few months - and most of them come down to issues Bernie can easily tune or adjust or move past.
 

Luminish

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,508
Denver
User Banned (Duration Pending): Inflammatory generalizations towards other members, a history of similar infractions
You know I almost prefaced it with that caveat, but I figured that a) Nina's TV appearances speak for themsles and b) Nobody would be ridiculous enough to make that accusation and c) Caveating it would be read as "I'm not racist but..."

You're welcome to browse my post history and see if I have ever even gone near that stereotype or anything remotely like it in my entire life and you're welcome to ignore the number of gaffes Nina specifically has committed that were unforced errors. There are easy tools to rport racism. There are a ton of mods with zero tolerance for even a whiff of it. You are free and welcome to report my post as I would if I genuninely encountered that.


There are several thinly and unveiled accusations of racism in this thread and at this point it's impossible to discuss the merits of campaign mistakes without being dogpiled.

I am not a racist.

I don't use racist stereotypes.

Applying them to this incident is unhelpful. Calling people racist is such a ridiculous esclation of rhetoric in an already charged environment that it creates an apalling atmosphere.

If Bernie wins, I want and need him to run the best campaign possible for the remainder of the year - and he has dials and levers at his disposal to avoid real or expploitable nothingburger problems that I wish he would use.
I think bias against bernie might leave you open to accepting arguments that are rooted in bias against black people, even if your adoption of that view honestly has no basis in race and it never crossed your mind as potentially racist.

That said, I'm very certain that the overall narrative of Brie Joy Gray and Nina Turner being too angry and rude is deeply rooted in racism. The examples people use of them being that way are way too common and mild to make sense of otherwise.
 

Pasha

Banned
Jan 27, 2018
3,018
I LOVE these stupid proxy attacks against Sanders, all it means is that they got nothing, fucking NOTHING on him.
 

Deleted member 11626

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,199
They've got something to push before every primary. Really curious about what the Super Tuesday hit is going to look like
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
I mean, we had a bunch of people just yesterday falling for a tweet that "linked" Warren's PAC (Oh, and this is a PAC, too) to a conservative oil lobbying group through someone they hired and people were saying snake snake snake.

Of course, that was fake news, the tweeter confused the name of one similarly named org with another, and the group in question lobbied against fossil fuels.
 

Deleted member 8860

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,525
I feel like if this were about another candidate's group the reaction would be very different.

Walk me through this. If a PAC with PoCs in positions of power affiliated with Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren fired a notoriously racist xenophobic Trump supporter from their organization, what would the reaction be?
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
Walk me through this. If a PAC with PoCs in positions of power affiliated with Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren fired a notoriously racist xenophobic Trump supporter from their organization, what would the reaction be?
That they hired that Trump supporter in the first place. See my second post in the thread for a very similar situation that turned out to be fake news, cause that literally is a situation with a hire with a (fake) conservative connection.
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
I mean, we had a bunch of people just yesterday falling for a tweet that "linked" Warren's PAC (Oh, and this is a PAC, too) to a conservative oil lobbying group and people were saying snake snake snake.

Of course, that was fake news, the tweeter confused the name of one similarly named org with another, and the group in question lobbied against fossil fuels.
These two things aren't comparable but nonetheless I agree with your initial position. Yes, I guess some people are biased towards their preferred candidates. This isn't surprising nor isn't relevant in assessing if this specific attack holds any water.
 

Fudgepuppy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,270
So rather than confronting the alleged racism in this group your first response is to attack Bloomberg for it based on tales from your ass?

Guess we know where your priorities are.

Wut? The poster didn't say that the group wasn't racist, but that it's an obvious hit-piece against Sanders. These things aren't mutually exclusive, and they're scraping the bottom of the barrel here to try and stop Bernie.

People seem to try and go for the Trump narrative with Bernie, by saying that he's enabling and supporting a shitty fanbase, completely ignoring that Trump's fanbase was just mirroring what Trump was saying. The part of the Bernie base that people consider toxic, are in no way actually mirroring anything Bernie's said or done. They're energized people who have gotten fed up with the bullshit, and finally have someone to rally with.
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
These two things aren't comparable but nonetheless I agree with your initial position. Yes, I guess some people are biased towards their preferred candidates. This isn't surprising nor isn't relevant in assessing if this specific attack holds any water.
It isn't? The connection was just a single staffer that a tweet was posted that contained their address and people were going angry mob on it. Reality is that the attack holds some small amount of water about the people he put in place to make hiring decisions and how hard it was to get this person out. It isn't a "sky is falling" thing by any stretch, but people are so quick to rush to "this is literally nothing only drummed up as part of a media conspiracy against Sanders" that it doesn't really feel like an assessment so much as confirmation of priors.
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
It isn't? The connection was just a single staffer that a tweet was posted that contained their address and people were going angry mob on it. Reality is that the attack holds some small amount of water about the people he put in place to make hiring decisions and how hard it was to get this person out. It isn't a "sky is falling" thing by any stretch, but people are so quick to rush to "this is literally nothing only drummed up as part of a media conspiracy against Sanders" that it doesn't really feel like an assessment so much as confirmation of priors.
Oh I was more so thinking that these things aren't comparable due to Warrens previous stance against taking PAC money and her various stances around lobbying in general.
 

krazen

Member
Oct 27, 2017
13,123
Gentrified Brooklyn
I mean, it's not surprising. These campaigns are run and staffed by the usual old boys club even if the old boys club is a remixed version of it. Progressiveness as a high school clique. Just like your various other bigots its easy to talk the talk but harder to self-examine and walk the walk. So to paint Bernie as being responsible here is laughable.

THAT SAID.

The idea that Bernie or by extention is really anti-racism is kinda ehh? It's still a candidate field filled with a bunch of privileged assholes who are learning about race on the fly (Bernie), hope their racial gaffes get ignored by their past associations (Biden), or hope that having 'a plan for that' for various aspects of institutionalized racism ignores trying to be a minority for cool points.

Im scared less about the politicians because as usual as a POC I have to hold my nose and vote for the abstract concept of 'least racist' but the people who actually believe their candidate is running a racism free campaign into a presidency nahmean? It's kinda baked into the system, even socialist ones, lol
 

Deleted member 58401

User requested account closure
Banned
Jul 7, 2019
895
This is a good time to remind everyone here: there is no way you get to a point in life where you're running for President without some awkward, potentially bad stuff happening along the way.

We don't know enough about this, and I'm white so I'm not going to waste air pontificating on substance. But vote for the democrat, please, unless a particularly hideous skeleton crawls out of the closet. For example, Roy Moore.

It's too important not to. The opposition is led by a gameshow host who bankrupted a casino, wants to bone his daughter, has assaulted at least 25 women, would prefer a dead earth to losing an election, says a fucking pandemic is a hoax, and on and on and on. I didn't even mention his crimes or his foreign policy.

Now is not a good time to lose. Even if it means walking in there and pulling a lever for, like, Klobuchar. We all have to do that.
 
Oct 25, 2017
11,573
I think bias against bernie might leave you open to accepting arguments that are rooted in bias against black people, even if your adoption of that view honestly has no basis in race and it never crossed your mind as potentially racist.

That said, I'm very certain that the overall narrative of Brie Joy Gray and Nina Turner being too angry and rude is deeply rooted in racism. The examples people use of them being that way are way too common and mild to make sense of otherwise.
Hey mods, are we gonna be doing this?
 

TaleSpun

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,449
"Our Revolution's 501(c)(4) designation prevents Sanders from playing a role in the organization because he is an elected official."
So he wasn't directly involved in what this organization did (though I am choosing to assume he helped pick out people for the board based on who is on it).

Seems like a hitjob piece IMO.

Of course it is. I feel a stretch in my neck just reading the quotes.
 

krazen

Member
Oct 27, 2017
13,123
Gentrified Brooklyn
This is a good time to remind everyone here: there is no way you get to a point in life where you're running for President without some awkward, potentially bad stuff happening along the way.

We don't know enough about this, and I'm white so I'm not going to waste air pontificating on substance. But vote for the democrat, please, unless a particularly hideous skeleton crawls out of the closet. For example, Roy Moore.

It's too important not to. The opposition is led by a gameshow host who bankrupted a casino, wants to bone his daughter, has assaulted at least 25 women, would prefer a dead earth to losing an election, says a fucking pandemic is a hoax, and on and on and on. I didn't even mention his crimes or his foreign policy.

Now is not a good time to lose. Even if it means walking in there and pulling a lever for, like, Klobuchar. We all have to do that.

Yes and no.

At a certain time there will be a reckoning for the greater mainstream establishment demanding that the suffering queer, POC, poor etc..."GET IN LINE" because THIS time these plans will help EVERYONE out.

How about, I dunno, you they get their shit together first. It's like a heist movie where the guy who plans it is like, 'Oh, we will work out the split after the job, trust me!' LOL. There's talk of white liberals as if its a dirty word, but white progressives have done an absolutely horrible job at inte-sectionality also. Not like we haven't had this play out for hundreds of years but this time...it's going to be different?
 

Nepenthe

When the music hits, you feel no pain.
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
20,678
Are you aware of what the report function is? "Hey mods!" Brings zero value to the discussion.
On the contrary, we are metaphysically omnipresent when logged on. All staff have the ability to be in all threads all the time. We just deliberately choose not to in order to mess with you guys.
 

aerie

wonky
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
8,030
This is the sort of topic that should be discussed in the primary ot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.