Starting to revise my Nin read only because he can't seem to make up his mind on whether he trusts Stu or thinks Stu is scum... going to go feed my animals so I should be around (at least on mobile) for EoD. Ride got rained out again :(
Well. It WAS fran. You know town!fran is scary to scum. Otherwise you have a point.So Scum Zeke used a day shot on day 1 instead of waiting for a better target who maybe claimed a role.
Since no one wants to join me on Nin, it's time to be that guy
Vote: Kalor
Tie at 5 each.
Honestly? I could go either way between Kalor and Malus. They're basically right next to each other in my scum rankings. Flipping Malus would tell us a lot about Wee and Stu both, so I have no problems with that. Similarly, flipping Kalor would give us information on TheChuggernaut, Stan and hopefully Nin.
If Kalor flips scum, how do you defend going from voting for him to following his lead in a handful of posts?
*truffleshuffle*
If Kalor flips scum, how do you defend going from voting for him to following his lead in a handful of posts?
Vote: Malus
O jinkies.....Right, I'm going to claim now to prevent a last minute rush.
I am Velma Dinkley, the jailer. I can target someone during the night and roleblock them. There's other elements but I don't want to reveal all my cards.
Night 1 was Stu
Night 2 was Sparks because I was wary after that messy claim
Why give a reason for sparks but not stu?Right, I'm going to claim now to prevent a last minute rush.
I am Velma Dinkley, the jailer. I can target someone during the night and roleblock them. There's other elements but I don't want to reveal all my cards.
Night 1 was Stu
Night 2 was Sparks because I was wary after that messy claim
So this is D2 reaction because jailing stu did not prevent kill?I have no interest in a Stu lynch. I don't really see the case against them.
So this is D2 reaction because jailing stu did not prevent kill?
Pretty sure this depends on the mods' cheatsheet selections rather than being an all-inclusive answer for every game.Since Kalor is claiming to have jailed Sparks, can people be RB'd from talking in a lover's chat?
Well, see it my way. You were on the list beforeThat's a weak justification. But that's a normal thing for you in this game.
But so was bae/malus. So it could go either way, but I'm gonna go opposite wee
Where are you going with this question?Since Kalor is claiming to have jailed Sparks, can people be RB'd from talking in a lover's chat?
This sort of stuff from kalor is why i've been town reading him. He isn't just taking my pre-supplied reasoning, and he could. he's being....honest. Or REALLY good at scum. But looks like simple honesty.Not really since I could have easily targeted scum but not the person with the kill. That was just my new read based on the start of day 2.
The Sheriff was a tracker.25 minute left. I'm not seeing the fluff link between Velma and Jailer (would have thought that was Fred) but fluff is just fluff. Surprised at Jailer and not Role Blocker. Jailer would imply we don't have a doctor :-\
I'm asking because if Sparks was blocked from being able to talk with Soneji then it'd back up Kalor's claim. Mind you I'm sure Sparks would have said something, so it's more of just a random thing I was wondering.
yeah, hence "fluff is fluff". Just feels like a missed opportunity 😿The Sheriff was a tracker.
Flavor is clearly not a good argument for this game.
I don't like this line if questioning, looks like fishing.I'm asking because if Sparks was blocked from being able to talk with Soneji then it'd back up Kalor's claim. Mind you I'm sure Sparks would have said something, so it's more of just a random thing I was wondering.
Well it wasn't, I just thought of it because I've been a lover before so naturally I wondered about it.
No it doesn't.
Sure......Well it wasn't, I just thought of it because I've been a lover before so naturally I wondered about it.
Full claim list?No it doesn't.
All the claims are out there. Too late for fishing.
Kalor claimed velma, who jailed sparks
Yeah, I don't see how Loki's comment is fishing.
I'm considering the role claim. This is a rough because there's not really a way to prove it