Not really sure what his education has to do with anythingI just checked his education. He's ivy league.
I'ma just be a cynic from here on out and assume fake means something else.
Not really sure what his education has to do with anythingI just checked his education. He's ivy league.
I'ma just be a cynic from here on out and assume fake means something else.
Ivy League boogeyman.
Oh come on, at least provide some context instead of going for the lazy troll. This is from 2013 and he's on record saying he wouldn't fundraise with them now due to their actions SINCE 2013, not before it.
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobby...ret-fundraising-with-jared-kushner-and-ivanka
That's not a quote dude. He said "Listen, I wouldn't take a dime from them now, but this was a time when they were Democrats," Booker said. "I mean, they were supporting Hillary Clinton, uh, and the Kushner family were big New Jersey Democrats, and really helped to fight against [Gov.] Chris Christie [(R)] and a lot of other folks."
He sounds too smart.
It's not the tone of his voice, fam.Nice speech, are people in this thread really complaining about his tone? It was fine and even if you found his performance "fake" or exaggerated, the content of his speech, the actual words of what he was saying was nothing but the truth and facts.
A white woman rolls her eyes at a black senator for refusing to be interrupted by her, and the bulk of the criticism is on the black senator for simply being erudite.
Fuck me.
I was paraphrasing. Relax. The link is there for everyone to read through.That's not a quote dude. He said "Listen, I wouldn't take a dime from them now, but this was a time when they were Democrats," Booker said. "I mean, they were supporting Hillary Clinton, uh, and the Kushner family were big New Jersey Democrats, and really helped to fight against [Gov.] Chris Christie [(R)] and a lot of other folks."
Can we stop with the disingenuous bullshit please.
I understand you were trying to paraphrase it but it was done in a way to make it seem like he was trying to put some kind of blame or something on her when he is really just pointing out how Ivanka & Jared fund raised for Hilary too years ago.I was paraphrasing. Relax. The link is there for everyone to read through.
Yeah that's clearly what I meant. You guys are ridiculous.Jeeze, guys, why don't some of you just call him an "uppity n*****" already and spare us the doublespeak.
Jeeze, guys, why don't some of you just call him an "uppity n*****" already and spare us the doublespeak.
As I recall from previous posts saying they don't like him, he's too cozy with corporations. I think that's it mostly.So are there legitimate concerns about Booker from his policy stances and the like or just this "fake" nonsense?
I just find it hilarious
*Cory Booker gives passionate speech*
"He's fake! He's just trying to run for higher office!"
*Bernie Sanders, who previously ran for higher office, gives passionate speech*
"Wow!! He's so passionate! He's sincere and he speaks to me!"
Like some of you guys just can't make it any more obvious. I mean, at least respect our intelligence and say what you really feel.
Have you ever done public speaking? I take pauses and emphasize timing in some areas over others all the time when I pitch to my team, and I'm not doing it for a camera or anything else other than to do my thoughts and ideas justice by presenting them as clearly and engagingly as possible. It's both for myself and those listening, since helps me collect my thoughts before diving into another idea, and gives the audience time to absorb and ingest. It's a balancing act to organize thoughts, distribute said thoughts and remember that it must be listened to by an audience, and you'll notice it a common behavior amongst the best speakers.Yes I think its the delivery. Which whatever, it's not like I'm gonna disagree with the substance of what he's saying. It strikes me like he's trying to make a viral clip. Like those weird pauses he takes in the beginning to make the last thing he said sound like the most important thing ever said, and it even had that crescendo where he starts relatively calm and escalates into outrage. The look she gives at 4:37 is basically my reaction. Like a little bit of "get a load of this guy".
So far, everyone I've met who hates Booker has a super vague notion about how he's too ambitious or something. It feels a bit like what I used to hear with Hillary.
So far, everyone I've met who hates Booker has a super vague notion about how he's too ambitious or something. It feels a bit like what I used to hear with Hillary.
So are there legitimate concerns about Booker from his policy stances and the like or just this "fake" nonsense?
shit the mayor of new jersey? that must have been a pretty detailed documentarythere's an old docu about cory booker on how he became the mayor of new jersey. pretty good.
People vaguely say he will do and say anything, which is a generic criticism that doesn't really mean anything to me. I mean, Elizabeth Warren's signature position largely involves vaguely not liking banks without any coherent solution to the problem. I mean, in that sense I don't prefer her as a potential candidate, but it's not a deal breaker anymore than anything.So are there legitimate concerns about Booker from his policy stances and the like or just this "fake" nonsense?
Yes I think its the delivery. Which whatever, it's not like I'm gonna disagree with the substance of what he's saying. It strikes me like he's trying to make a viral clip. Like those weird pauses he takes in the beginning to make the last thing he said sound like the most important thing ever said, and it even had that crescendo where he starts relatively calm and escalates into outrage. The look she gives at 4:37 is basically my reaction. Like a little bit of "get a load of this guy".
No one's denying Booker is planning on running for president, it's just a really fucking weird double standard to hold against political candidates. People do this shit all the time (no matter who they support) where they see a candidate they like give a speech (like Bernie in that example) and are like "Wow what a passionate guy, he deserves to be president!" but if it's someone they don't like out come the accusations of being a fake, having someone else write their speech, etc.I think it's incredibly naive to think Cory Booker wasn't grandstanding or not planning on running for president. And the responses here have been really bizarre and not really equal in degree to what was originally said. If you think I'm wrong (or anybody else that said similar comments) just say so. I said he comes off as insincere, and your general response is: "why don't you call him a uppity nigger like you want to". Wth? Where did that come from? Do you realize how odd and insulting that response is?
A white woman rolls her eyes at a black senator for refusing to be interrupted by her, and the bulk of the criticism is on the black senator for simply being erudite.
Fuck me.
No one's denying Booker is planning on running for president, it's just a really fucking weird double standard to hold against political candidates. People do this shit all the time (no matter who they support) where they see a candidate they like give a speech (like Bernie in that example) and are like "Wow what a passionate guy, he deserves to be president!" but if it's someone they don't like out come the accusations of being a fake, having someone else write their speech, etc.
Like can we just come together as a nation and accept that everyone running for president is at least some degree of narcissistic and grandstanding? Like. They're running for president. Of course they are.
You can see why this critique gets really fucking annoying, really fast. If you want to ding Cory Booker on his policies and positions, by all means, do that. I'm not the biggest Booker fan myself. But zeroing in on superficial bullshit and these "look at that bitch eating crackers" moments is what got us Trump. What started out as reasoned critiques of Clinton in 2016 (too close to Wall Street? too hawkish? sure) quickly became "RAAAAAWWWWWGHGHGHGHGH SHE ONLY SAID SHE LIKES HOT SAUCE TO PANDER TO BLACK VOTERS, THAT SHRILL LYING BITCH!" and the nation never looked back.
If Booker's speech really inspired this gut level reaction of distrust and dislike, you need to take a step back and start thinking about this shit logically instead of whatever it is you're doing right now.
A Kamala Harris x Cory Booker ticket running against [insert whomever is remaining after the Mueller takedown here] for 2020 is enough to give me the vapors. Too bad it's ultimately going to be Dwane Johnson vs Oprah Winfrey.