• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

psychowave

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,655
If the only rule in sony's policy was:

1. Don't let players grope children

This game would fail that
okay but what if i, as a consumer, want to grope children? sony shouldn't be allowed to decide whether i get to grope children or not. this is censorship and american imperialism (??????????????????) at its finest.
 

Puffy

Banned
Dec 15, 2017
3,585
Sony didn't do this for good reasons. They'd hit, for example, a Christine Love game even harder.

I don't like SK one bit, but Sony is trying to go old-school Nintendo arrogant and that shouldn't be rewarded.

The best move would prob be to make the game you want and release it on PC/Switch/ even XB1 if you have to.
Do you care to elaborate on this post?
 

Deleted member 35077

Self-requested ban
Banned
Dec 1, 2017
3,999
Honestly speaking, if we are talking about groping minigames I can't really think of any visual novel that has that feature. High amount of fanservice, yes, but groping itself seems like a feature too advance for most Visual novels. Closest thing I can think of is petting in Nekopara.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
53,073
Okay so I am confused by this whole situation. What exactly is being censored here?


Because at first glance I just thought this was the usual "big anime tiddy" game being taken down a few notches, but some of the posts in here make it sound like its alot more than that?
 

Ferrs

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
18,829
Its not about the content of individual games but Sony out of nowhere enforcing censorship on things that have already been rated, a policy that is incredibly inconsistent and there has been zero transparency or any comment from Sony, devs having to go through a certificafion process with Sony seperate from rating boards just to release their game on the platform in Japan

Not to mention Sony having zero regard for people making games for their platform by demanding a game to get delayed and censored months after it was rated and like a month before its planned release

I agree that Sony should be more open, offer clear guidelines, help developers to accomplish them(especially on their language).

But Sony doesn't need to have any regard or thoughts about what developers release on their platforms. The rating board talk doesn't make any sense, they're just guidelines for the consumer, but the platform holder/publisher, etc, still can decide what they want to release on their platforms, it's on their right. The developers are free to stick to their guidelines or just release their product elsewhere, but as long as Sony has a clear guideline for developers, there's nothing wrong in what they do. Developers aren't owed a platform to release whatever they want.

Btw this applies everywhere, not just gaming. Everyone has their own guidelines beside the public rating boards.
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
Okay so I am confused by this whole situation. What exactly is being censored here?


Because at first glance I just thought this was the usual "big anime tiddy" game being taken down a few notches, but some of the posts in here make it sound like its alot more than that?

A visual novel had a bikini scene censored .

Also Sony is demanding documentation in English from devs, even if the devs have no intention to release the game out of Japan.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
53,073
A visual novel had a bikini scene censored .

Also Sony is demanding documentation in English from devs, even if the devs have no intention to release the game out of Japan.

Was it just a normal swimsuit scene? Or was it an anime swimsuit scene? Because those are 2 very different things in my experience lol
 

Deleted member 35077

Self-requested ban
Banned
Dec 1, 2017
3,999
Okay so I am confused by this whole situation. What exactly is being censored here?


Because at first glance I just thought this was the usual "big anime tiddy" game being taken down a few notches, but some of the posts in here make it sound like its alot more than that?
We don't know really, as Sony doesn't want to reveal their new regulations. I would fully agree with this if this was only about touching minigames that harass the female characters, but we already have weird cases where even 18 years old in swimsuits got censor. Sony has been pushing too far with this, and is only punishing small devs. The worst thing about all this is that devs need to send all their paperwork in English to Sony's California office.
 

Sanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,557
But Sony doesn't need to have any regard or thoughts about what developers release on their platforms. The rating board talk doesn't make any sense, they're just guidelines for the consumer, but the platform holder/publisher, etc, still can decide what they want to release on their platforms, it's on their right. The developers are free to stick to their guidelines or just release their product elsewhere, but as long as Sony has a clear guideline for developers, there's nothing wrong in what they do. Developers aren't owed a platform to release whatever they want.

Just because they can doesn't mean they should. And Sony deciding to just suddenly not respect the rating boards the entire industry adheres to is kinda messed up.
 

blonded

Member
Oct 30, 2017
1,128
How does CERO allow this creepy shit in its games in the first place if it's so strict?
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
53,073
We don't know really, as Sony doesn't want to reveal their new regulations. I would fully agree with this if this was only about touching minigames that harass the female characters, but we already have weird cases where even 18 years old in swimsuits got censor. Sony has been pushing too far with this, and is only punishing small devs. The worst thing about all this is that devs need to send all their paperwork in English to Sony's California office.

The request for English seems like an odd request. Is that a normal thing they do?
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446

Deleted member 35077

Self-requested ban
Banned
Dec 1, 2017
3,999
The request for English seems like an odd request. Is that a normal thing they do?
No, they need to do this because there is no office in Japan to send the paperwork to. It is the def of unfairness that only wastes time and adds additional costs to small devs.

As for the swimsuit censorship, and reminder that she is 18 years old ingame.

Animation wise don't expect much, if any, in visual novels. It's just a static image.
 

Araujo

Banned
Dec 5, 2017
2,196
None of the actual good parts of games like Estival Versus or Peach Bleach Splash would not be affected by this, so im fine. The other stuff, the stuff that WOULD be affected by this... is the part that i don't mind getting reeled back a little bit.
 

Ferrs

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
18,829
Just because they can doesn't mean they should. And Sony deciding to just suddenly not respect the rating boards the entire industry adheres to is kinda messed up.

I don't see how it's a disrespect or messed up. There's no need to be this dramatic. This is just an usual thing that happens with platforms holders with each own having their own guidelines and values, there's nothing messed up in having those. That they should or not is an opinion of each of us not a truth fact.

The only bad stuff here is the language barriers and the seemingly obscure guidelines Sony may be employing. That needs fixing.

How does CERO allow this creepy shit in its games in the first place if it's so strict?

When your ratings are so strict that you can't show a nipple of red blood you tend to push on other directions.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
53,073
It is ever since Sony moved its games division to California and has baffled many Japanese devs.

Well thats weird. This is the first time I had heard about it. Strange.

I don't understand what this implies.


Well in some anime beach scenes are either normal (meaning the female character is wearing practical swimwear) or they are glorified fanservice scenes where the female characters wear extremely revealing and impractical swimsuits. I was curious as to whether it was the former or the latter because it would change the way I view the decision.
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
Well in some anime beach scenes are either normal (meaning the female character is wearing practical swimwear) or they are glorified fanservice scenes where the female characters wear extremely revealing and impractical swimsuits. I was curious as to whether it was the former or the latter because it would change the way I view the decision.

If its an adult in a consensual scene it really shouldn't matter, unless you're just outright against the idea of any sexuality, which is rather unfair to those who dont mind those things you know.

But see Castile's post, its super tame. Was still censored.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
53,073
If its an adult in a consensual scene it really shouldn't matter, unless you're just outright against the idea of any sexuality, which is rather unfair to those who dont mind those things you know.

But see Castile's post, its super tame. Was still censored.

I'm not against it all in general so long as everyone in the scene is of legal age and looks like they are of legal age, but I do understand it being censored or adjusted in video games in the right circumstances.


And yeah if thats all it is then that seems an odd line to draw in the sand considering some of the things I have seen in other games. I mean Dragon Age Inquisition had straight up sex in its game.
 

behOemoth

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,625
We still have sexy characters in games like Tekken, Dmc, Detroit, Uncharted, mass effect and others. I would even say that games became even sexier where characters openly engage to have sex.
The games SIE censored for now are games that engage "creeps". I see some problems but for now it's something needed and sie should be more transparent. It's basically the same discussions the porn industry had in the 60s and 70s.
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
I'm not against it all in general so long as everyone in the scene is of legal age and looks like they are of legal age, but I do understand it being censored or adjusted in video games in the right circumstances.


And yeah if thats all it is then that seems an odd line to draw in the sand considering some of the things I have seen in other games. I mean Dragon Age Inquisition had straight up sex in its game.

Thats why there's so much frustration. If it was JUST the Senran Kagura groping stuff you'd probably not see as much grumbling about this, outside of the stupid documentation stuff.

The issue is that the new rules are vague and only seem to be going after smaller devs for no reason, and the documentation stuff is just outright baffling.
 

Coyote Starrk

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
53,073
No, they need to do this because there is no office in Japan to send the paperwork to. It is the def of unfairness that only wastes time and adds additional costs to small devs.

As for the swimsuit censorship, and reminder that she is 18 years old ingame.

Animation wise don't expect much, if any, in visual novels. It's just a static image.


Okay so I am not sure if you are aware Castile, but I feel the need to warn everyone else in here that the Tweet itself is no big deal, but that Twitter account has some pretty blantat underage hentai on it. I made the mistake of going to the page to see if there was more info about the Senran Kagura stuff and.....yeah.


So I would strongly suggest not going to the Twitter Page itself
 
Last edited:

OldMuffin

Member
Nov 1, 2017
1,179
The person who started the petition on change.org just posted an update saying that they'll be having a conversation with Sony UK regarding this.

https://www.change.org/p/sony-towards-sony-their-new-policies/u/23700542

Well, at least something seems to be happening.
If true, this is an interesting development and I can't wait to see what or what doesn't come from this. Not sure if many petitions have succeeded in the industry and if this indeed got someone to talk about it at the very least, I would say that's actually quite the win.
 

AkimbOb-omb

Member
Oct 30, 2017
1,487
The person who started the petition on change.org just posted an update saying that they'll be having a conversation with Sony UK regarding this.

https://www.change.org/p/sony-towards-sony-their-new-policies/u/23700542

Well, at least something seems to be happening.

"I'll let them know what the problem is and why its kinda important for their future. Especially for the PS5 or similar products if they want to win the next console race again."

lol?

Okay, to get this straight, this is a petition to convince Sony that they shouldn't censor content in which underage girls are molested by the player. Okay. Just another sunday,,,
 

Seijuro

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,858
Japanese devs like Marvelous should release their games for Switch and PC then. Skip Playstation entirely.
 

Sanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,557
The person who started the petition on change.org just posted an update saying that they'll be having a conversation with Sony UK regarding this.

https://www.change.org/p/sony-towards-sony-their-new-policies/u/23700542

Well, at least something seems to be happening.

Hope they can talk some sense into Sony to either scrap this policy or atleast create some clear guidelines that make sense.

Also since I guess it adds some context to the petition. The petition was started by someone affiliated with a company that works with Marvelous. Its not a random petition but made by someone in the industry
 

Sangetsu-II

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,503
The person who started the petition on change.org just posted an update saying that they'll be having a conversation with Sony UK regarding this.

https://www.change.org/p/sony-towards-sony-their-new-policies/u/23700542

Well, at least something seems to be happening.

At least their smart enough to call Sony UK offices and not US. UK support actually listens (sometimes).

I don't know how effective 1 phone call would be though. Maybe if they posted the phone numbers on their update and got the 10K supporters to call it would make more of an impact. Meh
 

Red Devil

Member
Oct 29, 2017
824
I think the issue here, from the developer's perspecitive, is that Sony is being coy about their new policy despite it being already in effect. If they are not gonna allow depiction of underage sexual innuedo in their platform. that's totally fine. Just be transparent about what's going on. Everyone's waiting for an answer and Sony is strangely reluctant to do anything about it.

As for its aftermath, waifu bait stuff was always niche genre even in Japan, so I don't think Sony will suffer any negative consequence from this.
 

psychowave

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,655
lol?

Okay, to get this straight, this is a petition to convince Sony that they shouldn't censor content in which underage girls are molested by the player. Okay. Just another sunday,,,
there's two implications here
1. companies should care more about money than about, you know, not sexualizing children in their products
2. hilariously, these people think the creep community is large enough to swing a "console race" in favor of sony. how well do anime games with sexualization of children usually sell?
 

Principate

Member
Oct 31, 2017
11,186
I think the issue here, from the developer's perspecitive, is that Sony is being coy about their new policy despite it being already in effect. If they are not gonna allow depiction of underage sexual innuedo in their platform. that's fine. Just be transparent about what's going on. Everyone's waiting for an answer and Sony is strangely reluctant to do anything about it.

As for its aftermath, dating sim was always niche genre even in Japan, especially when it's waifu bait, so I don't think Sony will suffer any negative consequence from this.
Worst case scenario is mid tier below Japanese games move on from their systems which is either something that'll take a long time or won't happen because they're mid tier and below and need all the sales they can get.

Most likely these devs will just apply wholesale censorship to their content which will affect all platforms which is what I'm guessing is what Sony wants here.

there's two implications here
1. companies should care more about money than about, you know, not sexualizing children in their products
2. hilariously, these people think the creep community is large enough to swing a "console race" in favor of sony. how well do anime games with sexualization of children usually sell?
The vita was king of these games and was one of the lowest selling handhelds both in and out of Japan so not much
 

Hercule

Member
Jun 20, 2018
5,408
I'm still amazed how angry "adult" dudes get because they can't molest underage anime girls on PS4 anymore. Truly a hill to die on.

I wonder why everyone keeps posting things like this, even though people explained in great detail it's not only modes like that that are in danger.

I'm almost hoping Sony of Germany is going to be in charge of USA games localisation.
 

RockyMin

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,450
If the only rule in sony's policy was:

1. Don't let players grope children

This game would fail that

No it wouldn't. Because there's no "children" in the games. Just because you and a few others insist on seeing the characters a certain way, doesn't mean everyone sees them that way.
 

Sanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,557
As for its aftermath, waifu bait stuff was always niche genre even in Japan, so I don't think Sony will suffer any negative consequence from this

Of course there won't be any big financial consequences for this but they also aren't gaining anything from this. All that this has lead to is what feels like bullying niche developers and something that results in playstation users ending up with a censored version of a game. Considering the fact that this policy seems to have just become a thing like 2 months ago and is a complete mess I could see them quietly walking back on this with just a no touching mini game policy remaining maybe
 
Last edited:

Puffy

Banned
Dec 15, 2017
3,585
No it wouldn't. Because there's no "children" in the games. Just because you and a few others insist on seeing the characters a certain way, doesn't mean everyone sees them that way.
200w.gif
 

Zeel

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,164
Certain things are harder than they've ever been before.

I would argue quite the opposite, given the censorship and what the games are really about, if we are being honest.

And of course what the people who play them actually play them for.
 

HotHamBoy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
16,423
the boards have clear guidelines and give clear explanations when they rate games, sony doesn't.
obviously sony is running a closed platform and it's their right to decide what is and isn't ok, but i feel like they shouldn't exercise that right. what if in a few years we find out they demanded a game's content to be changed for political/idealogical reasons? will you also defend that?
So this is the slippery slope argument?

What if those political/idealogical things are fascist, populist propaganda? What if it's hate speech? Would you defend that?
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
I wonder why everyone keeps posting things like this, even though people explained in great detail it's not only modes like that that are in danger.

I'm almost hoping Sony of Germany is going to be in charge of USA games localisation.

Nobody seems to be interested in actually seeing the other things that are being pointlessly censored without any rhyme or reason, or the noticing the stupid documentation changes.

People just wanna get their "Anime is bad." comment in and leave.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
It doesn't. It already targeted games where the characters are 18 years old, and older, that have fully developed bodies. Even College students are force to change.

Senran Kagura has 15 year olds in it.

If there are other games with legit adults (not 9000 year old dragons) and they're not rape simulators I can entertain a debate Sony are at very least being inconsistent.
 

HotHamBoy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
16,423
No it wouldn't. Because there's no "children" in the games. Just because you and a few others insist on seeing the characters a certain way, doesn't mean everyone sees them that way.
Well, the game's own developers see them as children, soooo....

From the Senran Kagura New Wave official visual collection:
Hanzo Academy

Asuka - 90F 16 years old

Ikaruga - 93G 18 years old

Katsuragi - 95H 17 years old

Yagyuu - 85E 15 years old

Hibari - 80E 15 years old

Homura Crimson Squad (ex Hebijo)

Homura - 87E 16 years old

Yomi - 95H 16 years old

Hikage - 85E 17 years old

Mirai - 62A 15 years old

Haruka - 99I (as in after H) 18 years old

Gessen Girls' Academy

Yumi - 92G 17 years old

Murakumo - 96H 17 years old

Yozakura - 90H 16 years old

Shiki - 95I 15 years old

Minori - 86G 15 years old

Hebijo Clandestine something something

Miyabi - 90G 20 years old

Murasaki - 105K (biggest Senran Kagura bust period, including Daidouji and all 50+ New Wave girls) 16 years old

Imu - 88E 21 years old

Ryobi - 69AAA (concave?), 95I transformed 15 years old

Ryona - 98I 15 years old

Other Characters

Daijouji - 100H 25 years old

Rin - 97H 26 years old

Kiriya (Hanzo instructor) - 40 years old (bust info unavailable)

Murasame (Ikaruga's brother) - 22 years old

Ayame (girl in the store) - 82E 16 years old

Quite a few characters are as young as 15 in that game, most are under 18. The 15-year-old Minori's whole gimmick is that she behaves like a 5-year-old. Tell me that isn't creepy.

Just because the localization opted not to publish their ages doesn't mean that it wasn't what the developers intended.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.