-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider Runs at 4K/60FPS on XB1X
- Thread starter Rychu
- Start date
Not really. They did do a great job on the 360 version though.
I know right? Those studio heads, always starting "rumours" from the horse's mouth about the games they are developing. Era, with its rock solid track record in regards to how games will run on X, has the real facts.
Last edited:
One game is corridor shooter the game by one of the most renowned devs in the pc space and the other a liner game by a dev known for pushing tech with their engines. Neither of those games often sit at native 4k and they don't have the scale of ROTR. Furthermore, a competent dev in Nixxes could only get to 1080p 60fps on the XBX. This tells me one of three things, either the visuals will take a hit or, the scale of the game will take a hit, or the dev misspoke. Built from the ground up for the XBX means nothing when the XBX still has the same Jaguar cpu as the other consoles.
.
I assume he means "embarrassingly close to looking bad."
Although, I think it looks amazingly good for being a downport to the 360, personally.
yes, thats what i said. but you know..opinions. i 100% believe rise was cross gen.
...right, but who gives a shit about the 360 version? We're talking about video games in 2018 here.
Nvidia flops are calculated completely differently than AMD flops
A 980ti is well above the xbone x's gpu and powered with a modern cpu it smokes the X in graphical capabilities which is why 4K'60fps on the X sounds like bs in a semi-open world title running on the awful jaguar cpu. Unless there are significant graphical cuts on that setting or its actually 4K(inda) with variable framerate that barely reaches 60fps then Its far fetched to believe that the X version runs native 4k at a consistent 60fps.
...what?
Just so I'm not being unclear, it's a common enough opinion that RotTR is a generational showcase game that the first half of your reply seems overly dismissive, and the second half comes across as nonsense in either of the two interpretations I can put together.
Last edited:
980ti is like at least 50% better than what's in the x and pro.
I can see them implementing a 4k60 mode which essentially will be an unlocked framerate mode which makes sense, especially when they support vrr. It will reach its goal but of course not locked. Actually only a few games have that locked this gen.
It will potentially mean that the X version will offer a huge variety of different presets to choose from.
It will potentially mean that the X version will offer a huge variety of different presets to choose from.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider is one of the reasons I bought the X. After the great update to ROTR, I knew they'd really deliver. Can't wait
Why would you expect the tech to be disappointing when the new game is being built after the specs are known and accounted for?
He doesn't confirm if it's native though...that's like, crucial information when you say a game is 4K imo.
Checkerboard does a solid job, so even if it's not native I could deal with it pretty much.
Checkerboard does a solid job, so even if it's not native I could deal with it pretty much.
What specifically are you basing this on? What inside info do you have on Shadow?
Yup. Unless the game in graphically a downgrade, full 4k 60 fps is a pipe dream. Hope people don't really expect that lol. It's a 6 TFLOP GPu, not 12+.
Unless maybe they mean an unlocked fps that hits 60 when you look at the sky or the ground.
Fucking hell. Awesome stuff if they pull it off. And if they do, I'll be back in this thread with a smile on my face!
I'm proper looking forward to the game, I'm currently ploughing through the last parts of Rise.
Also, weren't there people on Era who were so damned sure the X wouldn't output true 4K? Lol.
I'm proper looking forward to the game, I'm currently ploughing through the last parts of Rise.
Also, weren't there people on Era who were so damned sure the X wouldn't output true 4K? Lol.
The first pages of replies in this thread is embarrassing. Constant salty snark.
The GPU being 6tflops instead of 12 has nothing to do with whether it will hit 60fps at 4k.
The GPU being 6tflops instead of 12 has nothing to do with whether it will hit 60fps at 4k.
A good 4kCB vs native 4k is very close in terms of IQ and detail resolved. Who cares if it isn't native 4k, 4kCB@60 fps would be impressive as hell. In fact, i hope most next gen games used 4kCB as opposed to native 4k.
I've no reason to believe this isn't the case... if it isn't true, surely the developers must understand the blow back would be quite large.
I've no reason to believe this isn't the case... if it isn't true, surely the developers must understand the blow back would be quite large.
Friendly reminder that TFLOPs are not comparable when it comes to hardware with entirely different architectures. A 6 TFLOP Nvidia card is not equivalent to a 6 TFLOP AMD card.
He never said he expected that. He is likely expecting the best console version of the game, which he's getting
Unless SotTR is getting built from the ground up to run at 60fps. I don't see how its possible for the X1X to hit Native 4K @ 60fps assuming the game is at the very least as demanding as RotTR. The hardware just isn't there for X1X. It couldn't even hold a stable 60fps on RotTR. I guarantee the guy meant it can do 4K and 60fps independently of one another. So in other words, a 4K mode, and a 60fps mode.
No, I don't particularly, but that's totally apart from what you said and who you were responding to.
Well I assumed the "After the great update to ROTR, I knew they'd really deliver." was referring to the title.
You guys don't even try anymore.
I am prepared to have a lot of fun using an asymmetrical controller!
Yikes, that sounds kinda weird. Hopefully they push some high end tech on pc like they did with rotr.
