Saw a screening today and it was really good. Definitely earns its PG-13 rating but the little kids in the audience seemed to love it.
They went for Big with superheroes and nailed it.
They went for Big with superheroes and nailed it.
I'm looking forward to this film.
It's kind of disappointing though that the DC Universe is apparently no more, and only after it's been dissolved does DC actually start making good films. Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Shazam...this is the approach they should have taken years ago. Focus on making solid films to introduce these characters, then start bringing them together. Instead, they wanted it all way too quickly and rushed out Justice League.
Just imagine - Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Shazam all released, maybe along with a new standalone Batman film. Then you release Justice League featuring all of these characters.
It should, and shouldn't needlessly antagonize Captain Marvel when it's gonna stand on its own.
No one is antagonizing Captain Marvel here. It's poking fun at the naming issues. The only people that seem annoyed are those expecting this thread to dissolve into comparisons, which it hasn't. Basically pointing out the title the way you are is bringing "negativity" where there is none.It should, and shouldn't needlessly antagonize Captain Marvel when it's gonna stand on its own.
Fair enough.No one is antagonizing Captain Marvel here. It's poking fun at the naming issues. The only people that seem annoyed are those expecting this thread to dissolve into comparisons, which it hasn't. Basically pointing out the title the way you are is bringing "negativity" where there is none.
No one is antagonizing Captain Marvel here. It's poking fun at the naming issues. The only people that seem annoyed are those expecting this thread to dissolve into comparisons, which it hasn't. Basically pointing out the title the way you are is bringing "negativity" where there is none.
Snyder is garbage who never understood what made these characters great
No but the phrase is something the Captain Marvel trolls were using when review bombing it. Levi even came out on Instagram and told people to cut that out.
But is it happening here? I'm not seeing any trolling just people having a laugh, or just acknowledging that Shazam's previous name until recently was Captain Marvel. That what were the chances that 2 Captain Marvel movies would come out a month a part from 2 different companies.No but the phrase is something the Captain Marvel trolls were using when review bombing it. Levi even came out on Instagram and told people to cut that out.
I think what also gripes me is that some people don't even know the context of retconning Billy's superhero name to Shazam and fully fault Marvel for it.
I think we'll hear about a new Justice League after Wonder Woman 1984, assuming that and Birds of Prey land with audiences. By then, Batman and hopefully the Flash will be gearing up to come out and they'll have a solid base of characters that audiences actually want to see to work with.I don't know why you would think the DC universe was dissolved. Shazam was pretty clearly in the same universe as the other movies, Aquaman referenced Justice League. What's happening is that the crossovers (Not counting Harley Quinn) are on hold for the time being. I'd bet another Justice League happens in a few years, with a new Batman and Superman, alongside WW, Aquaman, and Captain Mar...SHAZAM.
Familiar DC character at the end? Well, bets on Superman thinking Shazam is Kryptonian or Batman who recruits him to the Justice League all while learning about his secret identity and asking him to keep it secret.
I can't see Aquaman seeking him out. Wonder Woman possibly... Or I could see Flash. Who has the next DC movie after Shazam?Hopefully it's Wonder Woman or Aquaman aka the likeable DCU characters
The Birds of Prey are the next in continuity movie. Following that is Wonder Woman 1984.I can't see Aquaman seeking him out. Wonder Woman possibly... Or I could see Flash. Who has the next DC movie after Shazam?
With a few hours to process the movie I like it even more. This is the type of movie that you see when flipping through the channels and always end up putting on. That's a one of the biggest compliments I can give a film.
I'm looking forward to this film.
It's kind of disappointing though that the DC Universe is apparently no more, and only after it's been dissolved does DC actually start making good films. Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Shazam...this is the approach they should have taken years ago. Focus on making solid films to introduce these characters, then start bringing them together. Instead, they wanted it all way too quickly and rushed out Justice League.
Just imagine - Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Shazam all released, maybe along with a new standalone Batman film. Then you release Justice League featuring all of these characters.
That's because subpar spatula doesn't troll DCEU thread.Seems like on era the interest for Shazam! is super low comparitevly. A DC review thread being up for two hours with under 200 posts.
I'd like for it to do what comics actually do and have everyone dealing with their own shit entirely disconnected from a wider narrative, but still operating in the same universe. Big crossover events should be tied into one another narratively, but not necessarily the individual films.Eh, I'd actually like for this rebooted universe or whatever it is to keep every film seperate.
I'd like for it to do what comics actually do and have everyone dealing with their own shit entirely disconnected from a wider narrative, but still operating in the same universe. Big crossover events should be tied into one another narratively, but not necessarily the individual films.
Hell, get a small crossover series going with a rotating cast. Maybe even heroes who can't carry their own films and have those be the movies you watch leading into the big linewide crossover movies.
See, I disagree. The storylines don't have to be compatible in the least because in a crossover event that isn't dependent on a linewide singular narrative, you have whatever the threat is be internal to the crossover films' events. Ditto tone. As long as you have the characters acting like themselves the tone of the films don't have to be consistent between the disparate parts of the shared universe, because the stories are disconnected from one another. You'd just have to have the tone for crossover films and adapt the characters to that tone when using them. You can have a Wildcat film with Logan's narrative tone, for example, then bring Wildcat into a film with the tone of an Avengers without changing who he is or how he acts. You just have to adapt that to this different situation.Sure but I personally feel that tends to work best when you have crossovers with characters that fit together. Like Shazam and Superman always work well because they're similar in tone and appeal.
But when you combine all the heroes, you gotta make all the tones and story lines compatible to do that. Even with all the different genres in the MCU, there's still a very consistent tone and story beats across them all that feeds into the fatigue the films often have. The Jokes are all similar, meaningful threats are always non-existant, every single character is basically just Tony Stark and so on.
Cus suppose we could potentially get a Batman film on the same level of maturity as something like Logan. We wouldn't get that if he had to be put in a team up film with Shazam.
I was thinking about that, too, but I think it's more because it's got mostly across-the-board good reviews. There's no drama to discuss. It's just a good fun movie.Seems like on era the interest for Shazam! is super low comparitevly. A DC review thread being up for two hours with under 200 posts.
Agreed. I mean, that's how it works in the comics. Especially for DC, who's characters are more spread out and almost occupy their own worlds in comparison to Marvel's.See, I disagree. The storylines don't have to be compatible in the least because in a crossover event that isn't dependent on a linewide singular narrative, you have whatever the threat is be internal to the crossover films' events. Ditto tone. As long as you have the characters acting like themselves the tone of the films don't have to be consistent between the disparate parts of the shared universe, because the stories are disconnected from one another. You'd just have to have the tone for crossover films and adapt the characters to that tone when using them. You can have a Wildcat film with Logan's narrative tone, for example, then bring Wildcat into a film with the tone of an Avengers without changing who he is or how he acts. You just have to adapt that to this different situation.
Marvel totally did steal the name, but they stole it back in the 60s.That's the worst part. The YouTubers (and even Sandberg when he blamed "trademark shenanigans" for it on Twitter) keep pushing the propaganda that Marvel stole the name, when it was entirely on DC.
The movie should review well. I just saw it and loved it. 2nd best movie to feature Captain Marvel this month. Oh and Bor Gullet You'll be hearing from my lawyers about this thread title!
I chuckled when I saw it.
I don't understand why you have a hard time believing he liked CM more?Are you saying CM was better than Shazam? I saw CM two times and based on the reviews, compared to CM reviews, I'm having a hard time believing that is the case.
Iv been in since day one. Cant wait for it to release over here.
tickets arent even up for me so im checking like every day to make sure we get the best seats.
Its because it looks like the movie is good. :PSeems like on era the interest for Shazam! is super low comparitevly. A DC review thread being up for two hours with under 200 posts.