Someone please tell me Origami isn't like Sticker Star. Sticker Star was my first ever PM that I beat...but had to consult a guide to find out that I needed a certain sticker for certain bosses with know way of actually knowing this apart from either being lucky and having it on my or maybe. If anyone best STicker Star without a guide, then I doth my cap to you.
I haven't played Origami King yet, but by all accounts, it's better than Sticker Star in every possible way. No card based battle system, no "collect a bunch of key items in your sticker book with extremely limited space" bullshit.
It's more like Tanabe misinterpreted his suggestions and then ignored Miyamoto going "hey wait"
No. Not outright bad like SS or CS, but nowhere near as good as the original trilogy.
Funny how a "barely passble" game managed to sell so well, with some people even prefering it over Super Paper Mario.
Selling so well primarily because it released on the Switch in the middle of a drought doesn't exactly excuse Origami King for its broken battle system or its inconsistent storytelling.
I thought the storytelling was actually better that the last two Paper Marios, and a more of a return to form?
Like with most of Origami King, better than the last two Paper Mario games isn't saying much when said games were outright bad.
Seems like wikipedia failed me, then xD he did seem pretty involved in that one from the reveal, though.
I think for whatever reason, Miyamoto just really likes Star Fox.
I just finished Origami King, and I have to disagree with both. The storytelling in the game is somewhat formulaic, but it works rather well, with no dull moments. The combat is also good, IMHO; it's less focused on grinding and constant battles but instead, it mediates players towards unique battles, which are heavily scripted, fun, and unpredictable. This allows players to focus on exploration and other elements of the game that were more emphasized because you do not need to think about your strategy all the time. This is just my opinion, of course, but my perception of the game is very positive.
We should be talking less about Mario RPG characters and more about why we don't have another game with designs as cool as Strikers. I want to see Rosalina in this style damn it.
We're probably never getting another Mario Strikers, and if we did it would likely be in name only, with the style just being the generic Mario style.We should be talking less about Mario RPG characters and more about why we don't have another game with designs as cool as Strikers. I want to see Rosalina in this style damn it.
Exactly. When you actually look at the suggestions he made (do something fresh, stick to existing characters, questioning if the story is necessary), it's not like it'd even actually be remotely limiting to a good Paper Mario.
First, we need to obtain a license for Western developers to work on a Mario spin-off franchise. I remembered the Mario Strikers was done by a Canadian studio, Next Level Games, am I wrong?We should be talking less about Mario RPG characters and more about why we don't have another game with designs as cool as Strikers. I want to see Rosalina in this style damn it.
