No sadly wasn't me I don't believe you were typing to. But I do see your point, though I would argue that such a stance actually can have both instead of one for the other. You can very much enjoy and appreciate the musical talent and contributions that Michael Jackson as a SINGER has given to the industry, but then also condemn him for his actions as a PAEDOPHILE during his lifetime. Condemning one does not lockout or make it impossible to appreciate the other as his talented work transcended even he himself and is now just an iconic piece in pop culture. Yes it was created by him, and as I said I do understand your position of argument there but I do believe that when you can condemn but still enjoy it isn't making false or reducing the impact of either statement.
One can say that Michael Jackson was a visionary when it came to pop music and in fact influenced decades worth of musical talents and styles, but that during his lifetime he committed atrocious acts and should be condemned for such actions against children.
I'd argue no one is baiting him but he baiting people, however I do believe he needs to step away and take a breather. Throwing so much emotion into something which clearly strikes an imbalance is both good to see in your beliefs but not for your health.
