Exactly, black
You're not getting the fucking point. I will not for Bernie, Amy, Liz, Biden etc. Over Trump. Will you?
And do you know that all Dem nominees support climate change while Trump is doing everything to exacerbate it?
Black what?
Exactly, black
You're not getting the fucking point. I will not for Bernie, Amy, Liz, Biden etc. Over Trump. Will you?
And do you know that all Dem nominees support climate change while Trump is doing everything to exacerbate it?
Better than Trump's is simply not enough for the dire straits we're in from a climate focused perspective. Pretty much anything short of a full Bernie style Green New Deal and it's game over. I'll vote for anyone in the general but I sure as hell won't be enthusiastic about anyone but Bernie. I will fight for Bernie, I'll vote for Biden but I won't go to bat for him against his detractors because let's face it- he sucks.
That's not true at all homie. There were definitely people in this thread saying that they would stay home if Biden got the name, and then people backed him upEveryone you're responding to already said they'd vote against Trump in the general. The point is that voting for Biden in the primary is bad by the very same rationale. If you actually care about any of the issues -- kids in cages, climate change, foreign military invasions, healthcare, criminal justice reform, income inequality -- you should be voting for Sanders (or maybe Warren if you don't care about oppressing/killing civilians overseas).
Primary: Vote for whoever has the best policies.
General: Vote for whoever has the best policies (the Democrat).
Breh, chill the fuck out. I'm black, filled out a reply in response to that post and forgot that the draft was saved when I replied to another post.
Bill Clinton picked Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg for SCOTUS and his policies were far more conservative than anything that we see from Democratic candidates today, you don't need to worry about Joe.Idk after a career of being a center right politician who has run this campaign on working and meeting in the middle with republicans? Seriously? We think Joe fucking Biden is going to pick progressive judges for SCOTUS to push ultra progressive environmental laws when his plan itself isn't even up to snuff? Shit is wild in here.
so what would be better trump getting in for another term or voting to make life better? Trump getting in again is the worst case scenario anything else is secondary and if someone is not voting, it's basically equivalent of voting for trump.And then what? No policy goals, no nothing?
OP's topic was just bait to re litigate shit.
That's all that's expectedBetter than Trump's is simply not enough for the dire straits we're in from a climate focused perspective. Pretty much anything short of a full Bernie style Green New Deal and it's game over. I'll vote for anyone in the general but I sure as hell won't be enthusiastic about anyone but Bernie. I will fight for Bernie, I'll vote for Biden but I won't go to bat for him against his detractors because let's face it- he sucks.
Primary: vote whoever you want.
General: vote for the democrat.
That's not true at all homie. There were definitely people in this thread saying that they would stay home if Biden got the name, and then people backed him up
Breh, chill the fuck out. I'm black, filled out a reply in response to that post and forgot that the draft was saved when I replied to another post.
Primary: vote whoever you want.
General: vote for the democrat.
Who is saying this? Unless you are misconstruing the comments that say vote who you want in the primaries to mean they don't matter, but that would be weird.Anyone who's claiming that it doesn't matter who you vote for in the primary. It matters.
It's ironic, as a Canadian, I've never been so deeply interested in politics since I saw them neighbors going full idiot-of-the-village with the unexpected Trump victory over Hillary Clinton.Seems like campaigning material to keep his base, reprehensible as always.
Also, I do find it very amusing that the OP is Canadian.
Totally agree with this sentiment.If someone's passionate rhetoric was enough to "turn off" someone from voting against a white supremacist, they were no fucking ally to begin with and never gave a shit about black/brown/trans/women/minorities lives etc.
I apologize, I was defensive because I know how bad that short a phrase could be. Fucking multi-quote lol.what the hell is wrong with you lol. my response was just to find out what you were trying to say since you responded to me and it was cut off.
you need to take your own advice.
What on earth are you going to do when Trump gets another 4 years, during which time he makes the conservative majority of the Supreme Court even stronger, and then when the country finally manages to elect a progressive president and somehow also gets a progressive senate, and it still doesn't matter because Trump's Supreme Court will just rule any action seeking to fix climate change as unconstitutional?We do not have time to be sitting around until 2050 or prevaricate on whether youre going to ban fossil fuels. Shit needs to happen yesterday and anyone who isn't radically working towards that end is getting us to the same result.
I quoted someone commenting on climate change. So yes, this is true.
Ok, so that is what you mean. "Vote for who you want in the primaries" does not mean your vote doesn't matter, that's wild to think that is what it means.Anyone who's claiming that it doesn't matter who you vote for in the primary ("vote for whoever you want"). It matters.
Its irrelevant compared to Trumps. Its not enough to meet the standards we need RIGHT NOW. This isn't an issue that is to be compromised on.You think he will be grabbing his judges straight from the Federalist Society? His picks will surely be more progressive than Trump's. Not too mention all the other court judges appointed by him.
Not voting for the Dem candidate in the fall is putting the courts in the hands of people far fucking worse than middle road Joe.
I fucking hate sticking up for Biden, but good fucking god if he is on the ballot come November he gets my vote.
See above.What on earth are you going to do when Trump gets another 4 years, during which time he makes the conservative majority of the Supreme Court even stronger, and then when the country finally manages to elect a progressive president and somehow also gets a progressive senate, and it still doesn't matter because Trump's Supreme Court will just rule any action seeking to fix climate change as unconstitutional?
What Clinton did does not mean this is what Biden will do. Especially when Biden is selling himself as the guy willing to work with republicans. If you want to live in a fantasy world where he picks super progressive judges that would pass stuff even more progressive than the plan hes running on you can. But to anyone whose followed his career and reading his policy in comparison to what climate scientists tell us, it isn't going to be good enough.Bill Clinton picked Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg for SCOTUS and his policies were far more conservative than anything that we see from Democratic candidates today, you don't need to worry about Joe.
Ask me this question again once the dust from the primary settles down. Right now I'm 100% on board for a Warren or Bernie presidency. Anything less right now will suffice. If neither of those candidates do not make it past the Primary I will need time to settle down and come to terms about a Biden presidency. Telling me to vote blue no matter who, before the first primary vote has been cast, is telling me to shut the fuck up my voice does not matter.so what would be better trump getting in for another term or voting to make life better? Trump getting in again is the worst case scenario anything else is secondary and if someone is not voting, it's basically equivalent of voting for trump.
Every 2020 primary thread ever:seeing the left devour itself in this thread is sad. vote for who you want in the primary, vote for whoever isn't trump (the dem) in the general. period. you will agree more with the democrat than trump guaranteed (unless you're a sociopath)
So if Bernie or Warren don't get the ticket, then just fucking do nothing? That is what is being discussed here.Its irrelevant compared to Trumps. Its not enough to meet the standards we need RIGHT NOW. This isn't an issue that is to be compromised on.
And I'm sorry but I can't help but laugh that were seriously saying Biden would be picking progressive enough judges to pass radical environmental laws when his own plan isn't even where it needs to be. Its a farce, and theres no winning this argument by bringing up Trump regarding climate change. And Joe isn't middle of the road.
I did not say that. I only contended with the point that because all the candidates are running with climate plans that this makes them all equal or good.So if Bernie or Warren don't get the ticket, then just fucking do nothing? That is what is being discussed here.
Clinton billed himself as being willing to work with Republicans. Obama billed himself as being willing to work with Republicans. The willingness to work with Republicans doesn't seem to correlate with the type of Supreme Court justices you're likely to nominate. That's not a fantasy world, that's reality. Regardless of whether his nominees meet whatever bar you're setting out for "super progressive" the 5-4 conservative majority shifting over to the liberals on the court would be a change that would impact every level of government and on this front you really shouldn't worry about Biden's picks. If they're anything like the picks made by Democrats over the last few decades, it's going to be fine.What Clinton did does not mean this is what Biden will do. Especially when Biden is selling himself as the guy willing to work with republicans. If you want to live in a fantasy world where he picks super progressive judges that would pass stuff even more progressive than the plan hes running on you can. But to anyone whose followed his career and reading his policy in comparison to what climate scientists tell us, it isn't going to be good enough.
Its irrelevant compared to Trumps. Its not enough to meet the standards we need RIGHT NOW. This isn't an issue that is to be compromised on.
And I'm sorry but I can't help but laugh that were seriously saying Biden would be picking progressive enough judges to pass radical environmental laws
Its starting to sound like the excuses for Trump in 2016 when everyone kept telling us we couldnt believe what he actually said because he would do something different. I see absolutely 0 reason to think the centrist lib wont be capitulating to republicans when he says he will over the two other options with plans that are aimed at saving the planet, especially when the only evidence offered to the contrary comes from two entirely different people and administrations. Biden's climate stance is virtually disqualifying if youre talking about saving all life on the planet. And it doesn't matter that Trump is on the other end when his plan in and of itself isn't going to save us. Virtually all other topics pale in comparison to how singularly important this issue is.Clinton billed himself as being willing to work with Republicans. Obama billed himself as being willing to work with Republicans. The willingness to work with Republicans doesn't seem to correlate with the type of Supreme Court justices you're likely to nominate. That's not a fantasy world, that's reality. Regardless of whether his nominees meet whatever bar you're setting out for "super progressive" the 5-4 conservative majority shifting over to the liberals on the court would be a change that would impact every level of government and on this front you really shouldn't worry about Biden's picks. If they're anything like the picks made by Democrats over the last few decades, it's going to be fine.
I don't think you have a working understanding of how our government functions if you think it's going to be the job of the judiciary to pass any environmental laws.
Why is this so hardPrimary: vote whoever you want.
General: vote for the democrat.
Canada will take you
Then why do we need a thread on it?Why is this so hard
Seriously. Does anyone here NOT agree with this?
I'm not discussing the merits of climate policy.Its starting to sound like the excuses for Trump in 2016 when everyone kept telling us we couldnt believe what he actually said because he would do something different. I see absolutely 0 reason to think the centrist lib wont be capitulating to republicans when he says he will over the two other options with plans that are aimed at saving the planet, especially when the only evidence offered to the contrary comes from two entirely different people and administrations. Biden's climate stance is virtually disqualifying if youre talking about saving all life on the planet. And it doesn't matter that Trump is on the other end when his plan in and of itself isn't going to save us. Virtually all other topics pale in comparison to how singularly important this issue is.
They brought up judges as a counter to the argument, i answered regarding the judges. My original argument was more expansive than just SCOTUS.
Why is this so hard
Seriously. Does anyone here NOT agree with this?
I know rightCali would probably be quite happy to quit sending money to Alabama and Mississippi if they actually try and stop their funding. California by itself has, what, like the fifth largest economy in the world? They send way more money out than what they get from the federal government. If the federal government wants to play hardball like that, California's net profits go up, not down.
100%, until there's a legit third party that has a shot at the presidency it's absolutely a wasted vote. Saw so many Gary Johnson shirts before and after the 16 election I wanted to sit each one down and have a long chat.
In 2000 they literally had the federal government overrule the Florida decision to have a recount of ballots in their own state.Republicans: The Party of States' Rights*
*Void in California and New York
Then why are you quoting me because thats solely what I was talking about here, with the people you quoted me conversing with. Did you read the conversation or just jump in?I'm not discussing the merits of climate policy.
I'm not sure how you can genuinely make the argument that Biden represents an entirely different administration in an environment where he was literally second in command in the previous administration, he's not some disconnected figure who's values are unknown to us - he was an active participant in shaping this country through the Executive. Biden will work with Republicans when he finds an opportunity to do so - like any president who finds himself without full control of congress, when it comes to judges though there's been no indication that he'll depart from what Democrats have been doing with respect to judges since the 90s.
Why is this so hard
Seriously. Does anyone here NOT agree with this?
YesIs it okay to vote for, say, Tulsi Gabbard in the primary? If so, is it also okay for her to win the nomination, just so long as we all vote D in the general? Should we be happy with all the primary voters that forced us give the presidency to Gabbard?
Voting for the correct candidate in the primary is important, too.
In the primaries.it's pretty simple, just vote for whoever appeals the most to you.
Yes
Yes
Primaries are a terrible way of picking candidates so people should be unhappy with them in general, but if it leads to a Trump loss then also yes.
You're welcome to think what you'd like, I believe in it being "okay" for people to vote for whomever they believe best represents them. I have to console myself these days with the thought that ResetEra doesn't actually represent the majority of primary voters as evidenced by Biden's continued domination of the polls. There's something to be thankful for in that.I guess we're just not on the same page, then. I don't think it's okay to put your primary vote towards a homophobic, Islamophobic, dictator-coddling piece of shit who pals around with Bannon when we have better options.
I don't agree, fully at least.Why is this so hard
Seriously. Does anyone here NOT agree with this?
I don't agree, fully at least.
The polls are showing that the president is going to be either Bernie, Biden, or Trump. Any other vote is a waste. If we apply the same logic that we do in the general, that a wasted vote (i.e third party) is a vote for the opposite side (Trump in that case), then the same could be applied here. A vote for, say, Warren, is a vote that supports Biden, because it doesn't support a viable candidate.
The truth is, if anyone is serious about stopping Biden, they need to vote for Sanders. If someone doesn't care if Biden wins, and they wanna just show some love for their preferred candidate, they would vote for someone else.
Is this sarcasm? Please tell me this is sarcasm.I would never vote for Trump or any republican. However, I won't vote for any candidate that wants to pull ecigs off the market or tax it so it's unaffordable, I don't like the government interfering with something I enjoy.
I do agree to an extent, I think Biden is horrible in every regard and his policies will hold us all back, so yes, if someone here is arguing for Biden in the primary they deserve to be put on blast as much as Tulsi supporters.I get that 2016 primary Hillary supporters probably want to cover up how they wanted a transphobic slave using candidate who idolised Kissenger with the horrible foreign policy to support it to win in 2016 whilst they were certain Bernie was the racist one, but how is the primary any different from the general?
You shouldn't be excusing people who vote for Biden if they care about anything from institutional racism, horrifically racist foreign policy, or renewable energy when there are much better alternatives in Warren and Bernie. At least hold his supporters to the same standards as fucking Tulsi supporters when she at least lies out of her ass about how she doesn't want to kill PoC in other countries (please don't mention Modi... oh, nobody's mentioning Modi on the big stage? That's good!) Because people here wouldn't ever defend Tulsi supporters.
seeing the left devour itself in this thread is sad. vote for who you want in the primary, vote for whoever isn't trump (the dem) in the general. period. you will agree more with the democrat than trump guaranteed (unless you're a sociopath)
Nice job, y'all, comparing disabled people who are actively disadvantaged by your favored candidate's past positions and likely future positions (I can see no other reason why you'd try to force someone to vote for Joe FUCKING Biden) to MAGA chuds. You're not showing YOUR ableism and privilege at all. Never thought I'd see Era be a bunch of ableist bullies, but, well, here we are. Also spare me using black voters as a shield and bludgeon, when polls show consistently, again and again, there's a clear split even among black voters- support for Bernie vs. Biden is not a race issue, it's a generational issue. It also sets up the argument that anyone but white, cis, straight voters (sadly, for some reason, white, cis straight women helped get him elected too) got Trump elected, which is far from the case.
Also, let's get this straight. We have someone who, in this very topic, has been negatively effected by policies similar to the ones that have been put forward by the candidate they refuse to vote for. Surely, they aren't some strange outlier. And often, electability is brought up... Rarely, if ever, do we see marginalized voters say "I'm not voting for anyone in the main election but Biden or Pete", but instead "I'm not voting for anyone but Bernie or Warren in the main election". This in mind, to those of you "tut-tutting" non-voters' because voting blue no matter who is ostensibly for marginalized people's sake: is it not, instead, your moral prerogative to vote and promote a candidate most marginalized people would feel comfortable voting for? I mean, we all see what voting for a centrist Dem did for us last time- the ACTUAL most important election in this country's history.
To be honest, what argument can you possible proffer me that voting for anyone but Bernie or Warren in the primary, isn't a vote for Trump, if you argue "well, you're voting for Trump then" if someone sits out in the main election? If we're deciding the shame game is an acceptable tactic, why is it not an acceptable tactic for the primary first and foremost? 'cause lemme tell you, Diamond Joe and Pete aren't going to solve the problems of marginalized people, least of all the two things that are effecting marginalized people the most in America right now- healthcare and the climate crisis- among other very, very important issues.
And, if you really do, for some ridiculous reason, think Biden cares about marginalized voters, particularly those in the group the person you're talking to is in: prove it. Calmly. Explain why he's actually a better choice compared to the others in the primary based on both his track record and what he's saying now. Saying "no, you have to vote for him, because I said so and he has a D next to his name" wins you very little sympathy from people who have been fucked over, over and over again. There's a reason people don't vote (besides accessibility issues)- it's because they feel like their voice, their problems, are being actively ignored by the people who claim they care. This goes for both politicians and the people shouting down at them and making them feel lower than dirt for being of a marginalized group.
Like, I mean, I am going to vote blue regardless. But I'm also fairly privileged myself in spite of my mental issues and my sexuality. Even then, I can see and empathize with why someone would see Biden and go "well, things aren't going to be any better for marginalized people with him", even if I disagree. Perhaps those of you with privilege due to your race, gender identity, sexuality, ability, or economic class should too.
Obviously, if some straight, cis, middle-class-or-higher white person with no disabilities sits out of the election, fuck them. But most people saying "oh I'm not voting for Biden" are that. These are people who have been FUCKED by Joe and people like him, just like, you know, people who sat out last time were fucked by Hillary and people like her. Women. People of color. Disabled folks. The LGBTQ+ community. The poor. Centrist democrats are not truly our allies, they only pretend to give a shit to stretch the big tent to its breaking point and give progressive democrats reason to not split off into a third party. This is blatantly obvious when you compare the old rhetoric of a lot of long-time Democrats and their newer rhetoric while still refusing to actually update their policies to anything useful.
Well, unless the anger comes from a poor disabled person, they need to shut up and get in line behind the person who wants to fuck them over, right? Stopping the climate crisis is far more important, yet we still see people stooging for Biden, lol. Seriously, with his utterly pathetic game plan for climate change, it's game over for not just America, but the world, if we get him, a single judge isn't going to stop rising tides and wildfires, and with the current supreme court's makeup of ideology, you're not going to see a bill okaying the shooting or rouding up of climate refugees trying to escape their conditions get overturned. You'd have to replace a shitton of seats to do that, and with specifically progressive, not centrist, judges. And there aren't exactly a lot of those.
Of course, we wouldn't even be in this situation if we had beaten Trump in 2016. Oops.
There. Are. Marginalized. People. In. Flyover. States.
Nice response. How did that work out for you back in 2016?
Not well at all. That's the problem. I saw people on the fence being pushed away by people telling them to STFU and vote for their guy no matter what.Better and edgier question.
How's it working for you now? The whole dumbass vote I mean.
Closing coal plants/farms. Shit healthcare. No wall. Tax break for the rich. Etc.
Not you directly but the dumb shits.