No its not even a close comparison. Watch the tech video from DF on the xboxsex and you will understand
In the first years, 360 was absolutely the market leader. But over their lifetimes ps3 prevailed even in the states. Mostly attributed to games I believe.
Does bandwidth not matter?
Reverse of 2013. Higher clocks late in the day helped Microsoft somewhat close the gap, but they were limited by bandwidth.
The DF article literally states that they are building on the gains they made when it came to profiling how developers make games. How Microsoft is taking off tasks from the CPU so that there is more cores available to games, and how compression works at SSD level.
Because cerny said and DF too. I think he know the subject.
Clock speeds are one of the few things that can change this late in development, the cooling solution to counter those high clock speeds influences the final form factor, that is the reason we haven't seen the box yet.
Actually you're right. Global they overtook, even with 360 extra year of sales. But in US the never did as far as we know. So it's possible that could happen for ps5 here I suppose.
And obviously Japan, where PS3 sold over 9m units more than 360.
Hmm, do we have a clear idea of the RT performance of both systems? As DF mentioned, RT hardware is very important, but GPU power is important as well, so it would make sense that the XSX has the advantage. But do we have a clear idea on that? I haven't seen any actual numbers on RT hardware, for example.
No you are incorrect on some of what you said. First your buddy isnt giving you accurate info. The i/o peak speed is higher on the playstation, but that is only one part of the entire graphics pipeline.
Some of the biggest console warriors I've ever met are grown ass adults with families and mortgages. When I read these comments on the internet, I like to hope they're being made by a 13 year old - but experience tells me that it may be coming from someone much older.
You can argue this for every generation :)
this this gap is bigger then it was between ps4 and xbox one. Im not sure what you are talking about.
This is exactly what I was thinking too. Drawdistance options were always related to the GPU not being able to render fast enough. That is why certain games on weak hardware have a lot of pop in like grass a few meters ahead of the player.
People look to the final PS5 TF number but I still feel Cerny's point is being overlooked:
Both of the configurations above have the same TF on a comparison sheet but one is actually a third faster in most aspects and is notably more real-word performent (TF is only applicable to one part of the GPU while frequency affects plenty). As he pointed out, if you can handle the extra power and cooling needs then there's a lot to be said about being faster (it's also easier to fill 36CU's worth of work than 48CU's).
Real world performance benchmarking will be really interesting with the PS5.
You are clearly wrong and falling for peak performance numbers that sony put out. No console operates at peak performance all the time. The numbers for xsx are "sustained". You really need to watch the df video and listen to what they are saying.. The gap is bigger the it was last gen. Clearly bigger.
Im not sure what you are talking about.
