It is PRT, or more accurately PRT+ which appears to be a feature on multiple GPU's and is also coming to Windows for selected GPU's.
github.com
Oh yeah it definitely depends on how you have decorated your home, colours etc so I understand you.
They are trying something new, and hopefully there might come new type of games or something. And popularity .
Because we are getting XSX news for a while now. PS5 news finally dropped after long silence.
Maybe I wasn´t paying attention... but I don´t remember that response from devs and media in general when the specs for XSX were revealed.
It got spread out kinda over all the different announcements. We kinda "knew" the XSX was gonna be powerful etc.
You're overreacting. It's probably because a lot of devs care more about I/O than teraflops.
That's actually the thing I'm least concerned about with their design, since they have a perfectly fixed load they always have to deal with from a design perspective, rather than having to wonder what games might actually get it up to one day (RDR2, I'm looking at you) and guessing wrong.
They didn't mention controllers at all. FWIW, some people have speculated that the paddle attachment for the DS4 is to get it PS5 ready. I don't know if I believe that though.
Exactly so. This whole thread is downplaying one console or the others specs. It won't matter once we start getting 3rd party and direct comparisons can be made. Even then there will be plenty who downplay the results because it doesn't favor their console
Throwing out guesses of 3.2-3.4GHz is pretty disingenuous, Cerny stated it should run at 3.5GHz the majority of the time.
Yup. Sony's SSD is no joke, it's serious hardware that can't and shouldn't be ignored. Can't wait to see how it changes things for the PS5. XSX on the other hand has beastly CPU and GPU silicone (not that Sony's isn't strong) but 52 CU's (even if you ignore the 12.2 Teraflops) and 3.8 GHz processor is God tier next to how this gen hardware launched.
Has there been any more comparative analyses from people far smarter than I am and less embroiled in console warring?
I've seen the opposite actually. People constantly claiming that Sony is lying about the 10.3 TF flights and believing the rumor about ps5 supposedly being prone to overheating.
Can you list some of the games?
Yeah, here's my summary:
This point is odd. PS5 is 10tf (variable) vs 12tf. Are you saying the difference won't be as noticeable in certain games? Or are you saying that the gpu differences will actually favor the ps5 in some situations?
With how the system is designed you dont have to worry about that, they give constant a power consumption in demanding games and design the cooling system around that power level, which means they can ensure a certain sound level.
TF number is only a maximum theoritical compute capability, there are more things that determine the real performance, its not some end all be all variable that decides by itself if a game takes x amount of frametime to render. The main difference that this user pointed out is that PS5's GPU runs a lot faster, and generally faster clock is easier to handle than increased parallelization.
TF numbers have safely predicted the differences between consoles this entire generation. For example, the PS4 has a 40% stronger gpu. That difference was clearly shown in the games. Actually, the Xb1 has slightly higher clocks right? That didn't have any impact. The 40% performance difference was what it was, no matter what MS tried to argue against.
XB1 had a slightly higher clock, but not one to make a significant difference (6% difference, meanwhile PS5 has more than 20% higher clock), in addition to that, PS4 was also the leading development platform for the generation as it was the more popular hardware, there were also other differences between the GPUs beyond TF number (PS4 had 8 async compute units while X1 had only 2), and a huge difference in memory, this time its hard to say which one has the better memory, because of how you access the memory on Xbox.
