Salva has been posting basically nothing but filler the entire game aside from his pretty weak Malus read that just feels like something someone would say on day 1 and not 4 days into the game.
It's on the same page man
Salva has been posting basically nothing but filler the entire game aside from his pretty weak Malus read that just feels like something someone would say on day 1 and not 4 days into the game.
And your argument is wrong. Why would Faddy lie if he were town? And they knew that he wasn't scum so they have no doubts that he isn't lying.
Did you believe Faddys claim?Why on earth would they think that? Scum knows the balance of the team and has every reason to think Faddy is just bluffing and using a fake claim for no reason. Why would they think there's two people they can't lynch?
Why on earth would they think that? Scum knows the balance of the team and has every reason to think Faddy is just bluffing and using a fake claim for no reason. Why would they think there's two people they can't lynch?
So why would you (who allegedly doesn't know the balance of the game) believe there are two unlynchable players, while someone who knows the balance of the game should not?
Why on earth would they think that? Scum knows the balance of the team and has every reason to think Faddy is just bluffing and using a fake claim for no reason. Why would they think there's two people they can't lynch?
Why the first quote has my name? Besides that, I wasn't using your words. I just was telling Flux that he was making assumptions on really old info.
How would scum know Faddy's role? They don't know the balance of the game as they don't know what powers town have.
If scum knows that Faddy isn't scum they know that he would gain nothing lying. They always knew that he was telling the truth because a Faddy lying as town makes no sense.
Because it's pretty obvious at this point that you were parroting and sucking up to Faddy and there is a real possibility of lynching you today. Why wouldn't a partner bus you and try to gain townie points. If there are 3 scum partners I expect one of you to bus and the other that would try to defend or create a case on another player.
So why would you (who allegedly doesn't know the balance of the game) believe there are two unlynchable players, while someone who knows the balance of the game should not?
That doesn't make any sense.
If I was on the scum team I would not have assumed Faddy was lying. Despite how outrageous his claimed seemed at the time, Town members have no incentive to lie and lying usually backfires on Town. In this case Faddy's claim caused town to lynch him. Good thing he was telling the truth.
Nah scum knew Faddy was legit that's why they killed him because he had them spooked.
Okay, so let's see if I follow your argument for scum Chugg. I sucked up to Faddy to get him to town read me and got it to the point where he would be very unlikely to go for me, and then I killed him instead of going after people who were actually scum reading me.
Fran was over here speculating that he was a neutral at one point. They had no idea if he was even town or not.
My point was not why you would believe it, but why someone else with more information wouldn't.I. EXPLAINED. THIS. ALREADY. I have been over why I believed Faddy numerous times at this point. I'm not doing this again.
If I were scum and he was a neutral, why would I try to lynch him? What could I gain from that? Even more, why would I try to lynch an unlynchable neutral?
My point was not why you would believe it, but why someone else with more information wouldn't.
Townie points. Not to mention that after that shit he pulled with Cabot he was clearly more dangerous then almost everyone else
So I could gain townie point instead on pushing for an actual lynch for a townie, someone who would actually die? That makes no sense.
Well Chuggernaut I must admit I was a bit unnerved by your readiness to jump on the lynch train with Faddy after he suggested lynching me. Like you just jumped on the chance to lynch a townie the second another townie brought it up. But I'm not so sure actual scum would really be that transparent.
Faddy had to die, he was confirmed and took on a leader role. I imagine it doesnt matter who was town read on his reads at that point.Okay, so let's see if I follow your argument for scum Chugg. I sucked up to Faddy to get him to town read me and got it to the point where he would be very unlikely to go for me, and then I killed him instead of going after people who were actually scum reading me.
Not really. It's more like how they treated the claim. I can't scumread Apollo as I don't believe that she would kill a partner D1 and not try to take credit of it. She is semi-confirmed town for me. Swamped proggresion felt townie. She started believing but expressed doubts about it and was in the middle ground most of the time. I can accept that because Faddy was a strong town read with a bad claim. Zeke is weird. I would expect him to doubt the claim but was pretty null about it. That's why I'm suspicious of Zeke.
I think those where the one who didn't pushed Faddy. Did I missed someone?
Meh, seemed pretty str8 forwards to me. We either lynch faddy and proved the claim or we didnt. I made a post about faddy and his claim, you can go back and look.Zeke is weird. I would expect him to doubt the claim but was pretty null about it. That's why I'm suspicious of Zeke.
Why me specifically compared to swamped or meatwad?
Why me specifically compared to swamped or meatwad?
Vote: Fran
Why me specifically compared to swamped or meatwad?
Vote: Fran
Meh not really. You were with mal on my list in regards to the faddy claim.This vote is extremely weak. You are just jumping on a wagon that Chugger is trying to create.
So pocketing Faddy via sheeping, and also intent on not voting for him because of the possibility that he was indeed an unlynchable, and thus losing their chance at a D3 mislynch? It's a possibility.I'm convinced there is scum between TheChuggernaut and Swamped though I don't think they both are. Right now I'm more suspicious of TheChuggernaut. As I said yesterday, scum would not want to lynch Faddy, since it would probably result in a no lynch and they can't use him for distraction today. TheChuggernauts defense today hasn't really convinced me. What made you town read Faddy this much that you would follow him to vote for Meatwad who Faddy himself said may have a power role? This seems very opportunistic to me where you can say that Faddy was first to suggest this move.
vote: TheChuggernaut
Chuggs, what happens if fran is town? Then you go for Salva?
iirc you said both of them cant be scum together?
If there were 4 scum from the start, then now it'd be 7 v 3.
If we mislynch, it goes 5 v 3 for D5.
Then on D6, it's 3 v 3.
The next day phase wouldn't be MYLO if we mislynch today, right?
Alright, then I don't get this:
I know your read on exodus was early on, but I was pointing out similarities concerning your reads with SalvaPot, which continue. It's like trying to seed suspicion on certain players early on in case a momentum picks up later on, and then you can ride it. Just like that comment you made about me potentially being scum or Zeke.Why the first quote has my name? Besides that, I wasn't using your words. I just was telling Flux that he was making assumptions on really old info.
But we don't lose when it's 3v3.
I know your read on exodus was early on, but I was pointing out similarities concerning your reads with SalvaPot, which continue. It's like trying to seed suspicion on certain players early on in case a momentum picks up later on, and then you can ride it. Just like that comment you made about me potentially being scum or Zeke.
I guess there's that, unless we have someone who can manipulate the vote for town like scum did. The win condition does state: "You are aligned with Mafia and win when your faction controls the majority of votes at day start."Yes, we do. Scum can tie the vote and kill the next night.
Most gamerunners end the game directly.
Are you talking about Chuggernaut and exodus here?Did you read what I said about Exo? Didn't you also weird how both of them interacted?
There's one forming, however, that's undeniable. But it doesn't mean the target's wrong, either.
I guess there's that, unless we have someone who can manipulate the vote for town like scum did. The win condition does state: "You are aligned with Mafia and win when your faction controls the majority of votes at day start."
Are you talking about Chuggernaut and exodus here?
I would dome Fran and Salva but that is going all out into one world
Maybe one of them and Zeke or Malus.
Maybe Salva and Malus is the best bet to definitely have scum in the dome. They aren't together and to me it is very unlikely they are both town.
I like the talk of me getting thunderdomed to be honest, I love the attention and I agree pairing me up with Malus or fran.
I would like to see any combo of malus, Fran, and exodus in the td.
Exodus for reasons I outlined earlier.
Mal/Fran for sort of the same reasons. The way they pushed faddy about the claim. Also seemed like they waited to see a bandwagon form b4 voting.
1) Malus and Chugg
2) Malus and Fran
3) Malus and Salva
As long as Malus is in there I'm good.
Why does everyone want me in a thunderdome? I thought I had a pretty solid last phase, but I guess that's what you get when you try to be more active...
My thunderdome would be Swamped and TheChuggernaut or alternatively Fran and TheChuggernaut.
There's one forming, however, that's undeniable. But it doesn't mean the target's wrong, either.
Seems we disagree on what a wagon is.Chugger has been trying to create a thunderwagon between salva and me since day started. Of course there was a wagon.
this is very wifom isnt it?Oh, and if I was scum I would of just passed it to another scum mate and Fran would be in an actual thunderdome right now. You're kidding yourself if you think scum wouldn't of played the thunderdome card yet