this is a conspiracy theory and not grounded in the reality of how the market works. People are getting banned for posting that link because it is so far offInvestment firms have filed forms with the SEC saying that they own more stock of GME than actually exists.
![]()
The real reason Wall Street is terrified of the GME situation
Posted in r/wallstreetbets by u/johnnydaggers • 58,153 points and 7,905 commentsold.reddit.com
tl;dr
They filed these forms because some people actually own Gamestop stock, and others took out short positions that said "I will loan a share of Gamestop from you, and in return I will pay back the share in the future." So many investors took those short positions that they end up shorting more stock than actually exists. They wanted to use this phantom stock to help continue to drive Gamestops stock price down, and hopefully force a bankruptcy so their short positions make tons of money.
If these shorts have to be paid back, and the amount that has to be paid back is greater than the number of shares that exist in the first place, then the retail investors who actually went out and bought Gamestop stock will be able to sell it to the hedge fund investors who need to pay back their short positions.
If this happens, the price skyrockets while the hedge funds make their short positions whole, then they have the stock and the price starts to crater. If you're a retail investor you need to sell during this window or be left holding an empty bag, sure, but the nature of the situation makes it most likely for hedge funds to be left holding those empty bags.
In fact checking the entire reddit website history points out a few days before this "squeeze operation" was happening you can find a few threads outside of wall street bets suggesting silver should get squeezed. This market manipulation would be fairly lame if it wasn't news sources I usually trust peddling this information. Now it's just very dangerous for people not paying attention.I can’t believe the lack of journalism in these puff pieces. There are no long running account on WSB pushing silver, it’s all new accts and bots. The community isn’t exactly happy about it either.
Citadel is out and protected on GME
Just strange to me to see a thread based on obvious astroturfing from a massive hedge fund trying to recoup losses. Especially when many posters have pointed out reasons why we strongly believe this to be true.This is not meant to be an investment advice thread. It’s not framed as such. In any case, it’s up to the mods to do what they like with the thread.
It’s easier to understand when you realise this is not obvious astroturfing, with several reputable outlets reporting this. They may all be wrong sure but this thread was not made with some intention to boost hedge funds machinations. Not all news about the market is an investment advice or suggestion to make a particular move. Nor should anyone be doing so in any case anyway.Just strange to me to see a thread based on obvious astroturfing from a massive hedge fund trying to recoup losses. Especially when many posters have pointed out reasons why we strongly believe this to be true.
But you are correct. The community and mods will determine the type of content allowed here.
I'm not acusing you personally of malice, to be clear. But again, the point here is that the information within the article, the title, and the title of this thread are blatantly false.It’s easier to understand when you realise this is not obvious astroturfing, with several reputable outlets reporting this. They may all be wrong sure but this thread was not made with some intention to boost hedge funds machinations. Not all news about the market is an investment advice or suggestion to make a particular move. Nor should anyone be doing so in any case anyway.
As I understand it, it’s the same as how money creation works with chains of selling(depositing) and lending the same share multiple times. That’s how you end up with more shorts than the original float (or deposit in the money example).this is a conspiracy theory and not grounded in the reality of how the market works. People are getting banned for posting that link because it is so far off
go through my post history if you want the actual answer
Correct. There is some theoretical naked shorting, but that would be small potatoes.As I understand it, it’s the same as how money creation works with chains of selling(depositing) and lending the same share multiple times. That’s how you end up with more than the original float (or deposit in the money example).
It’s easier to understand when you realise this is not obvious astroturfing, with several reputable outlets reporting this. They may all be wrong sure but this thread was not made with some intention to boost hedge funds machinations. Not all news about the market is an investment advice or suggestion to make a particular move. Nor should anyone be doing so in any case anyway.
I have long ago.
I feel like many of us are reporting this thread.
Thanks OP, i just bought $50,000 in silver shares due to this thread.
CNBC has had no shame for a long time now. So obvious.Have had CNBC on since markets opened and they are going hard hard hard on the Silver story. It's insane how manufactured this is.
I keep asking myself the same thing. I feel like even mentioning it risks a backseat mod ban, but it's really surprising we have zero communication considering how many people are posting saying they are sending reports.Can someone please explain to me why this thread is still open or the title hasn't been changed?!?! Wtf is going on with the mods.
It's funny there was that thread the other day with the title asking when the mods sleep. I guess now we know.
This is a distraction. I am involved with the GME group, and the target is AMC.
Kid of seems that way. Big corporate news platforms close to Wall Street like CNN, CNBC, Wall Street Journal, etc, all started pushing it around the same time.This is a planted story right? Bots? It’s all over the news and just seems like a distraction to me..
That ban is pretty ridiculous tbh. I get banning conspiracy theories that play into racist tropes or harmful stuff like anti-vax/Stop the Steal, but a two week ban for calling bullshit on a stock market story? (Plus, none of the threads or guidelines forbid theorizing like this.)So correct me if I'm wrong, but yesterday someone caught a two-week ban for saying what everyone in this thread is saying?
![]()
Staff decided to let these stupid stonk gambling threads continue, and then end up in the totally-not-problematic position of separating good information from bad, with apparently none of the expertise required to do so.
What the hell is happening here? What is the plan?
It's a bit silly to act as if conspiracies do not exist. And in this case, that user's ban should be lifted.So correct me if I'm wrong, but yesterday someone caught a two-week ban for saying what everyone in this thread is saying?
![]()
Staff decided to let these stupid stonk gambling threads continue, and then end up in the totally-not-problematic position of separating good information from bad, with apparently none of the expertise required to do so.
What the hell is happening here? What is the plan?
Well this is not a good look. I'm going to assume like you said, we just don't have the people to go out and vet this stuff. I know modding is tough, but I feel like by now we know what this story is about.So correct me if I'm wrong, but yesterday someone caught a two-week ban for saying what everyone in this thread is saying?
![]()
Staff decided to let these stupid stonk gambling threads continue, and then end up in the totally-not-problematic position of separating good information from bad, with apparently none of the expertise required to do so.
What the hell is happening here? What is the plan?
Bumping this since it's ridiculous and all the reports for the thread is going ignored.So correct me if I'm wrong, but yesterday someone caught a two-week ban for saying what everyone in this thread is saying?
![]()
Staff decided to let these stupid stonk gambling threads continue, and then end up in the totally-not-problematic position of separating good information from bad, with apparently none of the expertise required to do so.
What the hell is happening here? What is the plan?
Official staff communication says silver is legitBumping this since it's ridiculous and all the reports for the thread is going ignored.