No, it isn't whataboutism to say that this is something that both sides of the debate are engaged in. Whataboutism is when you say that you won't solve a problem because other problems exist. Noting that other Democrats get primaried, including by people who support Omar, is saying that regardless of whether this is a problem it shouldn't be viewed as a uniquely Omar thing since by all accounts it happens across the board. That fact also undermines the framing of this as a problem since the process of primarying candidates within your party that you don't like is fairly integral to the American political process.
The point of the resolution was to turn the GOP's pearl clutching over Omar back around on them. If she wanted it to be about Omar, she could have made it all about Omar -- which is how it originally started. There are plenty of things Pelosi could do to reprimand Omar and marginalize her role in the House, and she hasn't done any of them. Not because "she doesn't want it to look too blatant" (why in the world would that matter?), but because she's actually not out for Omar's blood.
Liberals love eating up right wing talking points. They fall for them hook, line and sinker, when one of these articles gets posted.
Either they put absolutely no thought into their post or they do believe those two things are equal. Either way a bad look
Why would another Somalian want to run when they know their own party won't even have their back?
I don't think she will.
That sounds alot like rewriting what actually happened the last few weeks. You framing the bill as some planned counterattack against the GOP to protect Omar all along is what's really unbelievable.
Ehh, this is a misrepresentation of what she said. At no point did she say what you posted.
Likely referring to this quote:
Which again, is not saying "Obama was nothing more than Trump with a charming smile"
She only modified the resolution when she got pushback on it. Additionally, if she does take those other actions she would suffer politically as she would be giving in to the GOP minority that was pushing for it. That's not a measure of support, that was the smarter play for her.
Definitely a possibility that I have a reading comprehension problem. But you certainly aren't helping with it cause that definitely reads like you're saying she planned for it.
Pelosi said she did not think Omar's remarks were anti-Semitic and Omar has publicly praised Pelosi.
Yeah, that progressive ass kisser that takes money from lobbyists and panders to genocidal state.
I didn't say she was behind these bozos, must definitely their actions are they own. That doesn't mean she support Omar. If she felt her words weren't then why come up with not one but 2 resolutions on the matter in response to the reactions to Omar criticism of Israel and AIPAC power over USA Congress?
You don't get to be a bigot and apply antisemitism to any criticism of Israel policies just because specifically she is a hijab wearing black muslim woman
Supporting an apartheid state=progressive as fuck?
Lol, they think they're slick.
Personally when I say some I'm not saying single digits. I would use the term marginal or overwhelming minority.
