THEY WILL REVIEW THIS BUT DIDNT REVIEW THE SLEWFOOT IN GAME 5?! fuck off!
Yeah seriously. They've called back countless goals on offsides across the league, but such a blatant penalty gets crickets in replay.
THEY WILL REVIEW THIS BUT DIDNT REVIEW THE SLEWFOOT IN GAME 5?! fuck off!
Yeah seriously. They've called back countless goals on offsides across the league, but such a blatant penalty gets crickets in replay.
dont overheat in your tracksuit, donnyTHEY WILL REVIEW THIS BUT DIDNT REVIEW THE SLEWFOOT IN GAME 5?! fuck off!
Which part of "penalties aren't reviewable" are you guys struggling with understanding
I mean there is a lot of people that think offsides shouldnt be reviewable (within reason)I understand that's the current rule just fine, I don't understand why they didn't allow it in the first place if offsides was made reviewable. Beyond that I'd be shocked if the NHL doesn't change the rule after that game - they're generally quick to change rules when big flaws smack everyone in the face.
I mean there is a lot of people that think offsides shouldnt be reviewable (within reason)
I understand that's the current rule just fine, I don't understand why they didn't allow it in the first place if offsides was made reviewable. Beyond that I'd be shocked if the NHL doesn't change the rule after that game - they're generally quick to change rules when big flaws smack everyone in the face.
thanks for the advice, frontrunning masshole!
Pot, meet kettle.Typical fucking blues, game is out of reach so they start trying to injure everyone. Fight with your gloves on brehs