Much as I'm loath to link to comicbook.com, I don't think I've seen this Kurtzman quote posted anywhere yet. Regarding the Section 31 series:
Sweet! I hope it actually happens!
Much as I'm loath to link to comicbook.com, I don't think I've seen this Kurtzman quote posted anywhere yet. Regarding the Section 31 series:
And if you wanted even more confirmation
I'm just saying I find it surprising how many are on board with her just being part of the gang. Of any gang. Even Section 31's gang.
Binging DS9 last summer I wonder what the "purists" think of it considering how they trip over themselves to take shots at Dis over canoness or trekkiness
Did they forget it?
Did they not watch it?
Did they just hate that one too?
A syndicated science-fiction television series was not, in the early '90s, a prestige gig. But Berman called Visitor and pitched her on the vision for the show — and on Kira, a former member of a terrorist organization who had moved into a military position in a newly liberated society.
Fan reception to the character, and to the show as a whole, ran hot and cold. Previous female "Star Trek" characters had been helpmates — a switchboard operator (Lt. Uhura in the original series), a therapist (Counselor Troi in "Next Generation"), a healer (Dr. Crusher in "The Next Generation"). None had been a war veteran with emotional skeletons.
"Some people in the 'Star Trek' world were like, 'That's not what a woman in "Star Trek" should be. That's the wrong thing to be teaching,'" Visitor says. "But what I saw her as was a woman of appetite and gray area — lots of gray area. Very fallible, but growing and trying. And that's all over television now."
You used to say the show would become more popular after it was off the air. How did you feel about DS9's reception at the time, and how do you view its legacy now that it's considered by many to be the greatest Trek ever?
It was very clear early on that Star Trek fans are no different in some ways than other fans of other types of shows. They like what they like and that's what they want. I totally understand it, but we were doing something a little different. We set out to do something different and we held to that course no matter what. That's what we thought the franchise needed. Yes, at the time, it was different and different doesn't necessarily take off immediately. People are suspicious of different. We were able to do so many things because Voyager was the Star Trek series that waved the flag of the franchise. Or TNG before that, so we had our own pace to be that kind of somewhat outlier show. So yes, I always believed the audience would catch up. If I had any idea how the delivery system was going to change over the years, if I had any idea that there would be binging, I would have been even more definitive in my belief. But I had no idea about that. I just thought it would be a slow word of mouth.
Deep Space Nine's unflinching examination of what was dear to fans' hearts earned it the moniker of "the dark Star Trek", and viewing figures dwindled throughout its original run.
This was far from what Paramount had envisioned for the series, and as Ira Steven Behr reveals, there were many battles between the network and the writers. "We were told we were destroying the series by serialization, we were destroying Gene's future by introducing war and money, we were losing fans because they couldn't get into the show, we had no chance of getting new fans because they would watch one episode and give up. A lot of it was negative."
In fact, butting heads with Roddenberry was what inspired Ira Steven Behr to show another side of the Federation with Deep Space Nine. He reminisces about pitching a psychological episode of The Next Generation that examined Picard's fears of aging—and Roddenberry, insistent that Picard felt no such fear, replaced it with an episode about "getting the captain laid." At the time, this aggravated Behr, but it also gave him a great idea. "That's why I wanted to critique the Federation. Because to me, it all sounded like gobble-de-gook, this perfect 24th century… I just didn't understand how we reached that place where life was so damn good. Everything was a song, a beautiful song among the stars, but that's not how I saw it."
Such was the introduction of Section 31, a shady secret service dedicated to performing all kinds of necessary evils to ensure the apparently virtuous Federation could stay afloat. As Behr explains, "I wanted Section 31, the Federation itself, to be the villain. It was this idea that paradise is just a small piece of the puzzle."
With Section 31 never unveiled to the wider Federation, Deep Space Nine left audiences hanging on what this organization meant for Roddenberry's vision. As Moore puts it, "Utopia is an ideal, it's not achievable. There's an idea of humans striving towards perfection and never quite able to achieve it, and Section 31 is emblematic of that."
I've been a Trekkie a long time, and I dont think I've seen any of the previous casts having as much fun as Discovery's.
He woke up in MU and probably died when ship exploded,Should also add I loved the face Georgiou was pulling at the baby before Tyler turned to look at her when she then scowled again. She's not as evil as she makes out.
Also on the being inside Tilly
seems to keep suggesting that Stammets is an imposter. Off the top of my head I don't recall what happened of evil universe Stammets.
Anthony Rap just "liked" one of my tweets regarding that Carpool Karaoke videos. That's awesome lol.
well section 31 did use biological warfare on the founders so i don't think they care much about what she did in the other universe hell they probably think it's a plus for the job
I really like that a lot of the cast is so active on twitter. Normally I would just think it's someone controlling their accounts and a lot of times that's the case with some actors but I don't get that feeling at all. Not just with the Discovery cast but a LOT of Trek actors that are on twitter.Anthony Rap just "liked" one of my tweets regarding that Carpool Karaoke videos. That's awesome lol.
I'm pretty sure Discovery is that show. The Cage took place about 3 years ago in the current Pike timeline so whatever happened, it's behind him. Let Pike have too much fun with Discovery and be it's Capt until he ends up with radiation poisoning. Then, let Saru become the captain. That way they can have the Enterprise refit those nacelles and get back to its original style design, but with a modern polish.So, on the one hand, Section 31 show, Picard show... so... three shows in production? For real? That's pretty badass.
On the other hand, the easy win was Lorca as lead on a Section 31 show. I forget did Enterprise decide to do an episode where Section 31 gets founded? If not Lorca should've come up with the whole damn thing! Mirror Emperor Georgiou is just too cheesy.
Someone upthread mentioned Pike/Enterprise show with a "The Cage" remake as a finale. I'm all in for that idea. That would be rad as hell. Four shows. Let's do it CBS. You the Star Trek Channel now. Only problem is... we don't really know if the Spock they cast is decent.
Also the Lower Decks animated show 👍So, on the one hand, Section 31 show, Picard show... so... three shows in production? For real? That's pretty badass.
Yeah I said the same while watching it. A few less of those kinds of shots pls.
So, on the one hand, Section 31 show, Picard show... so... three shows in production? For real? That's pretty badass.
On the other hand, the easy win was Lorca as lead on a Section 31 show. I forget did Enterprise decide to do an episode where Section 31 gets founded? If not Lorca should've come up with the whole damn thing! Mirror Emperor Georgiou is just too cheesy.
Someone upthread mentioned Pike/Enterprise show with a "The Cage" remake as a finale. I'm all in for that idea. That would be rad as hell. Four shows. Let's do it CBS. You the Star Trek Channel now. Only problem is... we don't really know if the Spock they cast is decent.
Also what's the deal with the Karaoke thing? I thought that was a... that one guy with a late night show bit... They turned it into a standalone show? On... Apple? And yo. Dawg. Dawg. Not gonna lie. It got a little pitchy as soon as... well everyone after Anthony Rapp joined in.
I forgot about that. On the one hand... it seems kind of dubious to me. On the other hand... 525,600 Star Treks.
I meant Mirror Lorca, I just kind of assume OG Lorca was a spineless ninny. Though granted Mirror Lorca got a bit cartoony himself when his true self was revealed and he got caught up in the wash with the Mirror Georgiou stuff.
Not getting Matt Berry to play a Klingon is a giant missed opportunity. If he doesn't appear as a S31 operative in the spinoff I'll be mad.
This adds dimensions to Georgiou's character, that despite her ruthless demeanor, she may retain some semblance of humanity if not compassion. Non-verbal gestures and facial expressions can convey much about a character as much as dialogue and action.Should also add I loved the face Georgiou was pulling at the baby before Tyler turned to look at her when she then scowled again. She's not as evil as she makes out. [/SPOILER]
Exactly. Part of it is all just about projection. I'm not suggesting she spends her Sundays in a huge bubble bath, but she's not the cutthroat bitch that has been portrayed until this point. Bearing in mind she made reference to her own kids earlier in the episode as if they were nothing to her.This adds dimensions to Georgiou's character, that despite her ruthless demeanor, she may retain some semblance of humanity if not compassion. Non-verbal gestures and facial expressions can convey much about a character as much as dialogue and action.
You shut the fuck up, Ash Tyler - you fake ass Klingon in a patak's body.I thought Point Of Light was pretty solid, like a good 6.5/10. I didn't love it, but I generally liked it even if it felt a bit Season 1-ish. I've come to the conclusion that while I don't dislike Season 1 of Discovery, I've never had the urge to rewatch it except for one time with the Mudd time loop episode.
Not getting Matt Berry to play a Klingon is a giant missed opportunity. If he doesn't appear as a S31 operative in the spinoff I'll be mad.
Ha. True enough. Maybe a glimmer of humanity was just nice to see.I don't know how you soften the image of someone who ate people, but good luck with that.
That whole episode felt like a boring backdoor pilot for the show that's coming up, so...
That whole episode felt like a boring backdoor pilot for the show that's coming up, so...
I think the only way it could be interesting is if they just admit that the people in S31 are pure evil and don't try to redeem them ala Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul/Suicide Squad. But I'm sure they'll just be anti-heroes like everyone else on TV nowadays.Section 31 is the most boring part of the Star Trek universe. Who needs another grim dark """realistic""" show.
I think the only way it could be interesting is if they just admit that the people in S31 are pure evil and don't try to redeem them ala Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul/Suicide Squad. But I'm sure they'll just be anti-heroes like everyone else on TV nowadays.
I agree that S31 shouldnt be portrayed as cackling bad guys. Usually they seem to operate with the best intentions (for the Federation at least). However, Imo the series should show that as often as their tactics might work they fail or are counterproductive overall in the end. Much like Special Circumstances in the Culture the viewers should be taken on a ride from 'this is what it takes to maintain utopia' to 'is this really necessary or helpful?' Not sure they have the nuance to make a series like that though.Thing is I don't think Section 31 has ever been shown as pure evil though or even just evil. I know some want them to be that way as to not "ruin" the idea that a utopia could be formed without hidden help but showing them that way would actually being going against what little we do know about them.
Section 31 is the most boring part of the Star Trek universe. Who needs another grim dark """realistic""" show.
That just isn't that interesting to me given that we have idealistic anti-heroes already - like Michael Eddington.As Effect said, they're not evil, they're just the epitome of ends justify the means in contrast to the Federation idealism. In a way, taking in Super Space Hitler makes sense since for them since the Terran Empire is what they are all about. Not the imperialistic, moustache twirling, eating sentient beings part, but the twisted version of post-utopia humanity's singular drive to improve themselves. I may need to rewatch Enterprise's mirror universe episode but the first encounter with Vulcans in both universes lead the end of intrahuman bigotry.
It still contrasts so heavily with the general tone that I love and fundamentally undermines the aspirational quality of Star Trek, which makes it so unneeded. It adds to the show in the same way digging a hole in your lawn is technically increases the surface area.
I dunno I always liked the idea of Section 31. The idea that the goody two-shoes Federation's clandestine arm was every bit as evil/diabolical as the Tal Shiar or Obsidian Order.
That just isn't that interesting to me given that we have idealistic anti-heroes already - like Michael Eddington.
The S31 we saw in DS9 was ready to commit genocide - something even Picard couldn't do to the Borg. If they're just Star Trek's suicide squad, that is a bunch of bad asses in black leather trench coats instead of neon lycra jumpsuits, then what's the point?
Here is the Super Bowl ad. Hopefully this means we get to see Spock soon.