This.
It's ridiculous how they ignore this issue while trying to push PSVR.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
[State of Play] PlayStation VR Announcement Compilation & Info
- Thread starter MattAces
- Start date
This.
It's ridiculous how they ignore this issue while trying to push PSVR.
Great to see PSVR keep it's momentum going and it looks like it's going to be another very solid year for PSVR games.
From "Sony is not committing to VR because they're not making an AAA VR game" to "Sony is not comitting to VR because they've not making a VR game in every one of their franchises".
Ok, so how does my argument about Sony not putting its AAA franchises turn into me challenging the ENTIRE PSVR library of 300 games (which none are Sony AAA games evidently, someone can correct me)?
I also didn't say PSVR wasn't the best selling VR device so I don't even know where this argument materialized from.
Call of Duty has a "VR mode" or does it have the entire game being played in VR like RE7? Is it the same game? BTW I don't care about this argument that you brought up since again, my initial discussion was about Sony franchises.
Also, thanks for confirming that you were being disingenuous with me on my points.
If you are not here to argue about Sony's nonexistent AAA franchises on VR, then what exactly are you arguing with me for?
Please prove that I said this...
This discussion is a colossal waste of my time. You're moving goalposts, being devious, disingenuous and outright lying.
Bye.
The poster said:
And I responded by saying...
Where in all of this did I say "Sony is not committing to VR because they're not making an AAA VR game"?
Ok, this was a waste of my time too. I didn't move goalposts (prove that), wasn't devious (Are you serious?), wasn't disingenuous (I was clearly telling you what I know), and....lying (yeah, this conversation is over since I didn't lie about anything, I challenged all of your arguments that DID move goalposts from my initial point).
What? You actually made a more ridiculous claim than that: "Sony is not committing to VR (that is, PSVR is like the Vita) until they make ALL of their games VR". Not "one game": all. This is an absolutely preposterous condition that evidently can never be met; a standard of "commitment" that anyone can see is only formulated so as to be unattainable.
I mean, it's clear you're not trying to convince me, but who exactly are you playing to here? Who is your audience? Who do you expect to read what you post and think "sounds legit"? You realize anyone in the thread can see what you wrote, right? This is absolutely surreal.
It's pretty obvious that you're not interested in anything but gaslighting, disingenuity and straight out denying facts that anyone can see with their own two eyes, so yeah, good day to you too.
I'm glad there's an ignore button, used it for the first time today.
Why are you responding to me without proof that I moved goalposts?
There was one genuine response to my post:
Which is true, they are doing an admirable job but isn't really giving there all since they need to have *ahem* their big franchises doing more of the footwork...they have the development studios with talent so they should figure out how to build their AAA franchises around VR...this was my point for the entire thread...
Edit: And yeah I know the ignore button is the fallback when arguments fall apart and you can't back them up anymore...
Yeah, beyond some point, further engaging trolls only serves to give them what they want. Hopefully mods will take care of it.
Spot on, there's only so much one can say in a civilised manner before losing it. We're on the same page about this person.
