I thought it was an interesting take worth talking about even if the topic is certainly controversial. But let's stay calm. He's right that raping animals is less accepted than outright killing and eating them, that's not up for debate is it. I think with respect to humans, we perceive killing as the worse crime at least if prison sentences are anything to go by. What would you respond to Destiny with regards to this issue? Which moral framework can you come up with that makes killing and eating animals for pleasure (certainly not ouf of necessity in this day and age) acceptable but not sexually abusing them, while staying consistent? How does raping an animal get a negative response out of someone who eats said animals?